New research from Yale University reveals how gun violence spreads over social networks through a process of social contagion.
Gun violence is often described as an epidemic or a public health concern, due to its alarmingly high levels in certain populations in the United States. It most often occurs within socially and economically disadvantaged minority urban communities, where rates of gun violence far exceed the national average. A new Yale study has established a model to predict how “contagious” the epidemic really is.
In a study published online on January 3 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the researchers studied the probability of an individual becoming the victim of gun violence using an epidemiological approach.
Led by Andrew Papachristos, associate professor of sociology at Yale, the researchers analyzed a social network of individuals who were arrested during an 8-year period in Chicago, Illinois — a city that has rates of gun violence more than three times the national average. The team studied connections between people who were arrested together for the same offense, and found that more than 60% of all gun violence during this time period happened in “cascades” — or connected chains — through these particular social networks.
“We want to take this epidemic of gun violence out of the criminal justice paradigm and put it in a public health context that focuses on victims and the reduction of trauma,” says Papachristos, corresponding author on the study.
The study also determined that an individual within these social networks was at the greatest risk of being shot within a period of about 125 days after their “infector,” the person most responsible for exposing the subject to gun violence, was the subject of gun violence. These results provide evidence that gun violence is not just an epidemic, but it has specific network patterns that might provide plausible opportunities for interventions, notes Papachristos. “There is a real value in understanding the timing of these events as a way to identify victims, and where we can insert resources such as violence- and harm-reduction programs into these networks.”
“If we want to drop gun violence rates in this country, we have to care about the young men with criminal records who become victims of gun violence,” says Papachristos. “By and large these are young men of color who have criminal records. Their lives are worth saving.”
Other authors on the study included Ben Green ’14 and Thibaut Horel from Harvard University.
Reference: “Modeling Contagion Through Social Networks to Explain and Predict Gunshot Violence in Chicago, 2006 to 2014” Ben Green, MSc1; Thibaut Horel, MSc1 and Andrew V. Papachristos, Ph.D., January 3, 2017, JAMA Internal Medicine.
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8245
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
5 Comments
well if check they all had water in 24 hr of shooting someone so it was the water that caused the people to kill someone. that would also explain why some used a knife, car, hammer, rock, ball bat.
This is not a contagious issue. It’s a racial issue. Blacks killing other blacks to prove how badass they are.
No surprise, fads work the same way. You can see the same thing happen with suicide also. Drug use and overdoses also.
It’s Yale, what did you expect?
Interestingly, during the time of the study (2006-2014) the national firearm murder rate was declining and the average for the period was about half of what it was during the peak in 1993. What does that do for the conclusion that changes were the result of some kind of social contagion spreading among potential killers? It doesn’t convince me that the model is particularly useful for understanding the situation when the proposed driver is having negative results.