Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Health»Parkinson’s Disease Is Actually 50% More Common in the U.S. Than Current Estimates
    Health

    Parkinson’s Disease Is Actually 50% More Common in the U.S. Than Current Estimates

    By Parkinson's FoundationDecember 15, 20221 Comment5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Parkinson’s Disease Puzzle Concept
    Current estimates put the number of Parkinson’s disease diagnoses at 60,000 annually. However, new research reveals that the actual incidence rate is nearly 90,000 diagnoses each year, which is 50% higher.

    New Parkinson’s disease incidence rate totals nearly 90,000 diagnoses each year, compared to previous estimates of 60,000 diagnoses annually.

    Parkinson’s disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease. It is much more common in older age, with a population prevalence of 4% at age 80 compared to 1% at age 60.  It is a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, rigidity, and difficulty with balance and coordination. Symptoms usually begin gradually and worsen over time, with cognitive decline common at later stages. As the disease progresses, people may have difficulty walking and talking.

    New research reveals that the annual incidence of Parkinson’s disease (PD) among older adults is actually 50% higher than current estimates of 60,000 diagnoses annually. Published today (December 15, 2022) in the scientific journal npj Parkinson’s disease, the peer-reviewed study measured new cases of Parkinson’s disease, or the number of people diagnosed with PD per year.

    The key findings include:

    • PD incidence estimates increase with age in the 65+ range.
    • PD incidence estimates are higher in males as compared to females at all ages.
    • PD incidence rates are higher in certain geographic regions: the “Rust Belt,” Southern California, Southeastern Texas, Central Pennsylvania, and Florida. (The “Rust Belt” consists of parts of the northeastern and midwestern U.S. with a history of heavy industrial manufacturing.)

    Regional and Gender Differences in PD Rates

    “These updated estimates of incidence are necessary for understanding disease risk, planning health care delivery, and addressing care disparities,” said James Beck, PhD, co-author of the study and chief scientific officer at the Parkinson’s Foundation. “Knowing this information will allow us to better serve people with Parkinson’s and their families and plan for adequate health care services in the future.”

    This study is the most comprehensive assessment of Parkinson’s incidence in North America based on five epidemiological cohorts to count the number diagnosed in 2012. Prior Parkinson’s disease incidence rates, based on smaller studies, were estimated to be in the 40,000 – 60,000 range per year. The new incidence rate is 1.5 times higher at nearly 90,000 cases annually. The primary risk factor for Parkinson’s disease is age and the increase in the incidence of PD aligns with the growth of an aging population. 

    Environmental and Geographic Influences on PD

    “Unique to this study, we found that PD incidence estimates have varied for many reasons, including how cases are identified and the geographic location of the study,” said Allison Willis, MD, lead author of the study and associate professor of Neurology in the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. “The persistence of the Parkinson’s disease belt in the U.S. might be due to population, health care or environmental factors. Understanding the source of these variations will be important for health care policy, research and care planning.”

    The study was supported by the Parkinson’s Foundation and The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research (MJFF), as well as the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES). 

    “The growth in those diagnosed and living with PD underscores the need to invest in more research toward better treatments, a cure, and one day, prevention,” said Brian Fiske, PhD, co-author of the study and chief scientific officer at MJFF. “It’s also a clear call to lawmakers to implement policies that will lessen the burden of Parkinson’s disease on American families and programs like Medicare and Social Security.” 

    Addressing the Growing Burden of Parkinson’s

    Results from the study could help inform recruitment strategies for research studies and guide what types of individuals to enroll and where. They may also shed light on Parkinson’s “hot spots” where more resources might be needed — whether it is a registry for researchers to analyze critical data or programs and services to support people and families living with PD. A clearer understanding of the incidence of Parkinson’s disease in the U.S. helps organizations, researchers, and care teams adapt to the evolving needs of the PD community and could serve as a framework for a global assessment of the disease. 

    The Parkinson’s Foundation formed the Parkinson’s Prevalence Project to calculate an accurate estimate of the prevalence (a measurement of all individuals affected by the disease at a given point in time). The study estimated that 930,000 people in the U.S. would be living with PD by the year 2020 and this number is expected to rise to 1.2 million by 2030. In addition, a previous study backed by MJFF and a handful of partners revealed the economic burden of PD in the U.S. The study showed that Parkinson’s disease costs the U.S. $52 billion every year and will cost $80 billion annually by 2037.

    Reference: “Incidence of Parkinson’s disease in North America” by A. W. Willis, E. Roberts, J. C. Beck, B. Fiske, W. Ross, R. Savica, S. K. Van Den Eeden, C. M. Tanner and C. Marras on behalf of the Parkinson’s Foundation P4 Group, 15 December 2022, npj Parkinson s Disease.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41531-022-00410-y

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Brain Neuroscience Parkinson's Disease
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Weird Link Between Parkinson’s Gene and Vocal Issues Could Lead to Earlier Diagnosis

    New Hope for Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease: Designer Neurons

    Key Discovery Points to Possible Driver of Parkinson’s Disease and Lewy Body Dementia

    Deep Brain Stimulation Research Shows Promising Results for Treating Parkinson’s Disease

    Brain Mapping Method Illuminates Targets for Treating Depression and Parkinson’s Disease

    Simple Blood Test Can Accurately Reveal Underlying Neurodegeneration (Dementia, ALS)

    Parkinson’s Gene PINK1 May Impair How New Neurons Are Made Throughout Our Lifetime

    Identifying “The Terrorist Inside My Husband’s Brain” – Living Brain Imaging Can Clearly Differentiate Between Types of Dementia

    Parkinson’s Disease Eliminated in Mice by One-Time Genetic Treatment that Generates New Neurons

    1 Comment

    1. Charles G. Shaver on December 15, 2022 8:07 am

      Based upon my personal decades long awareness of serious problems with medically undiagnosed food allergies and FDA approved food poisoning (namely added soy [late 1960s] and MSG [1980]; others), despite not finding a functional timeline (as usual) of PD cases, fresh online searching of Parkinson’s Disease (PD) this morning revealed a connection between dopamine and estrogen I wasn’t previously aware of. So, I think it’s safe to state that my (Dr. Coca’s) kind of food allergies can cause PD through allergy related excess uric acid/low pH killing off dopamine producing neurons in more men, with younger women being somewhat protected against early onset via their estrogen being protective uric acid. In cultural/geographical areas of higher rates of incidence, if I were a well funded research professional, I’d also look to local and/or traditional diets to help explain those. So-called “modern medicine” and its incompetent, mostly ‘demographic,’ statistics are so ‘dark-ages.’

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Bone-Strengthening Discovery Could Reverse Osteoporosis

    Scientists Uncover Hidden Trigger Behind Stem Cell Aging

    Scientists Find Way to Reverse Fatty Liver Disease Without Changing Diet

    Could Humans Regrow Limbs? New Study Reveals Promising Genetic Pathway

    Scientists Reveal Eating Fruits and Vegetables May Increase Your Risk of Lung Cancer

    Scientists Reverse Brain Aging With Simple Nasal Spray

    Scientists Uncover Potential Brain Risks of Popular Fish Oil Supplements

    Scientists Discover a Surprising Way To Make Bread Healthier and More Nutritious

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Europe’s Most Active Volcano Just Got Stranger – Here’s Why Scientists Are Rethinking It
    • Why Are Giant Ants Letting Tiny Ants Crawl All Over Them?
    • Revolutionary Technique Sends Healthy Mitochondria Exactly Where They’re Needed
    • This Student Recreated the Universe in a Bottle. What She Discovered Could Help Reveal How Life Started on Earth
    • Alzheimer’s Symptoms May Start Outside the Brain, Study Finds
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.