
Lutetium clocks have achieved record accuracy and comparison precision, making them promising candidates for future time standards and measurements of gravity.
An atomic clock built from the element lutetium at the Centre for Quantum Technologies (CQT) at the National University of Singapore (NUS) has set a new benchmark for timekeeping accuracy. Results published in Nature on show that the clock measured its transition frequency to 19 decimal places, yielding an uncertainty of 1 × 10⁻¹⁹, the lowest reported for any optical atomic clock to date.
“I am confident that what we have now is the most accurate clock in the world,” says team leader Murray Barrett, a CQT Principal Investigator and Associate Professor in the Department of Physics at the National University of Singapore.
Lutetium’s resistance to temperature swings
Atomic clocks keep time by locking onto an atomic transition, an event that occurs when an atom’s electron swaps energy levels at a fixed frequency. A laser is tuned to match this “clock transition,” and the oscillations of its light mark time much as a pendulum’s swings do. In the CQT clock, that reference comes from a single electrically charged atom, or ion, of lutetium-176 (¹⁷⁶Lu⁺), whose transition is matched to a laser with a wavelength of 848 nanometers.
Temperature changes and magnetic fields can shift the transition frequency an atomic clock uses to measure time, so researchers must account for those influences when assessing its accuracy. Lutetium’s clock transition is barely affected by either, giving the clock a reference that remains stable across a wider range of conditions.
“The good properties mean that high accuracy can be achieved even in a wide range of environments,” Barrett says. “The lutetium clock would be stable even if you went from the hottest place recorded on Earth in Death Valley to the coldest place in the Antarctic plateau.”
The team began investigating lutetium more than a decade ago, suspecting that its properties could put it among the best elements for timekeeping. Turning that possibility into a working clock took years of precision engineering and measurements of the atom’s properties. The researchers also invented a method called “hyperfine averaging” to define the clock transition. To their knowledge, they remain the only group working with lutetium for timekeeping.
When millimeters change a clock’s ticking
The researchers built two lutetium clocks and compared their ticking over 200 hours using a technique called correlation spectroscopy. The clocks agreed within an uncertainty of 5.7 × 10⁻¹⁹, the most precise clock comparison ever reported. Taking more measurements could reduce that uncertainty further.
“There is a humorous saying that ‘A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure,” says Kyle Arnold, a senior research scientist at CQT at NUS and joint first author of the paper. “It basically tells you that the only way to test the accuracy of a standard is to compare clocks and demonstrate reproducibility.”

Gravity slows the passage of time, causing clocks at different heights to tick at slightly different rates. Optical atomic clocks operating at the 10⁻¹⁹ level can detect that effect over height differences of mere millimeters. The CQT comparison could resolve a difference of 5 millimeters, about 0.2 inches, between clocks on the same table. To keep that difference from limiting the comparison, the researchers independently measured the relative heights of the two lutetium ions to less than a millimeter.
That sensitivity to gravity also complicates checking the lutetium clock against the world’s other leading atomic clocks. Differences in gravity between locations on Earth are not yet known well enough to separate their effects from differences in the clocks’ performance at this level of accuracy.
“In the future, I just don’t see how this clock can be beat,” Barrett says.
Beyond the cesium second
Cesium atoms have provided the reference for defining the second since the 1960s, and cesium atomic clocks support GPS and synchronize communications and transportation networks. Optical clocks use much higher transition frequencies, giving them more oscillations to count over the same interval and helping them measure time more accurately. Recent record holders have used ytterbium, strontium, and aluminum, the elements whose performance the CQT team reports its lutetium clock has surpassed.
As these clocks improve, the international body responsible for time standards is considering their measurements for a redefinition of the second, expected in or after 2030. Their sensitivity to gravity could also become useful beyond the laboratory, allowing researchers to monitor gravitational changes across Earth. More accurate clocks could additionally help investigate unresolved questions in fundamental physics.
“The next step is to take the lab-scale clock and miniaturize it into a transportable system,” says Michael Lee, a PhD student on the NUS team and joint first author of the paper. Moving the clock out of the laboratory would enable new comparisons and allow researchers to explore those applications. The team expects it can make the clock smaller without compromising its accuracy.
Reference: “Lu+ optical frequency references with accuracy verified at the 19th digit” by K. J. Arnold, M. D. K. Lee, Qi Zhao, Qichen Qin, Zhao Zhang, N. Jayjong and M. D. Barrett, 23 September 2026, Nature.
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-11072-8
This project was supported by the National Research Foundation, Singapore, through the National Quantum Office, hosted in A*STAR, under its Quantum Engineering Programme 3.0 Funding Initiative (W25Q3D0007) and under its Centre for Quantum Technologies Funding Initiative (S24Q2d0009).
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
3 Comments
You have to hand it to the metrology teams building these dual-lutetium ion optical clocks—achieving precision down to the 19th decimal place is an extraordinary feat of engineering. Pushing hardware to the point where a clock can detect a microscopic change in elevation just by registering a minute shift in local frequency takes years of meticulous calibration and grit.
Of course, as mainstream physics celebrates this as the ultimate way to measure the “fabric of time,” they are entirely missing the mechanical reality of what their hardware is reacting to. There are no fundamental “ticks” or universal seconds; time is as fluid as the continuous medium allows, driven entirely by local gravitational impedance gradients and torsional density variations within a 3D manifold. When a clock shifts because it is moved a fraction of an inch, it is registering a localized change in spatial-torsional stress that alters frequency propagation. Hats off to the engineers for building a sensor this sharp—now it’s just a matter of watching mainstream theory realize their ultra-precise devices are measuring dynamic medium tension, not ticking seconds. The Link , https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TIuQESrA-mJao6h7rBiv_sXv_DjDAJbPEnGQJxh9IaQ/edit?usp=drive_link
When mainstream physics talks about frequency shifts in ultra-precise clocks or gravitational anomalies, they are observing the macroscopic effects of local torsional stress within the continuum. We can express the dynamic medium tension tensor (sigma_ij) in terms of rotational field gradients and local impedance:
sigma_ij = kappa * (partial_i omega_j + partial_j omega_i) – Z_imp * grad_k Phi
Where:
kappa represents the continuous medium’s rigidity coefficient.
omega_j is the local rotational node vector (vorticity/twist of the manifold).
Z_imp is the temporal gradient impedance.
The Torsion Hill framework is built on rigorous continuum mechanics and tensor mathematics, any physicist or engineer reading it will immediately understand the mechanics—even if it challenges their point-particle training.
Terms like rigidity coefficients, stress tensors, and rotational gradients are the universal language of engineering and physics. When a technically minded reader sees those terms laid out, they recognize that you aren’t just using vague pop-sci buzzwords; you are applying actual continuum physics.
They might initially struggle with the shift from discrete particles to a continuous medium because they’ve been trained on standard quantum math, but the mechanical logic itself is completely transparent to anyone who understands how stressed continuous systems behave.