The experimental setup by Daan Boltje and Ernest van der Wee. The lens of the light microscope (bottom right) is surrounded by air and looks through a glass plate at the small sphere. On top of the glass plate, the sample is placed in a drop of water. The distance between the glass plate and the sphere is adjustable, allowing the researchers to vary the depth. Credit: Delft University of Technology
Studying tissues, cells, and proteins under a microscope is essential for disease prevention and treatment. This research requires accurately measuring the dimensions of these biological structures. However, when viewed through a light microscope, these samples can sometimes appear more flattened than their true form.
Researchers at Delft University of Technology have now demonstrated for the first time that this distortion is not constant, contrary to what many scientists have assumed for decades. The breakthrough, published in Optica, confirms a prediction by Nobel laureate Stefan Hell from the 90s. With an online calculation tool and software, every researcher can now determine the correct depth of a biological sample.
Flattened sample
When viewing biological samples with a microscope, the light beam is disturbed if the lens of the objective is in a different medium than the sample. For example, when looking at a watery sample with a lens surrounded by air, the light rays bend more sharply in the air around the lens than in the water. This disturbance leads to the measured depth in the sample being smaller than the actual depth.
As a result, the sample appears flattened. “This problem has been known for a long time, and since the 80s, theories have been developed to determine a corrective factor for determining the depth. However, all these theories assumed that this factor was constant, regardless of the depth in the sample. This happened despite the fact that the later Nobel laureate Stefan Hell pointed out in the 90s that this scaling could be depth-dependent”, explains Associate Professor Jacob Hoogenboom.
Calculations, experiments, and web tool
Sergey Loginov, a former postdoc at Delft University of Technology, has shown with calculations and a mathematical model that the sample indeed appears more strongly flattened closer to the lens than farther away. PhD candidate Daan Boltje and postdoc Ernest van der Wee subsequently confirmed in the lab that the corrective factor is depth-dependent.
Van der Wee: “We have compiled our results into a web tool and software provided with the article. With these tools, anyone can determine the precise corrective factor for their experiment.”
Understanding abnormalities and diseases
“Partly thanks to our calculation tool, we can now very precisely cut out a protein and its surroundings from a biological system to determine the structure with electron microscopy. This type of microscopy is very complex, time-consuming, and incredibly expensive. Ensuring that you are looking at the right structure is therefore very important,” says Boltje.
“With our more precise depth determination, we need to spend much less time and money on samples that have missed the biological target. Ultimately, we can study more relevant proteins and biological structures. And determining the precise structure of a protein in a biological system is crucial for understanding and ultimately combating abnormalities and diseases.”
About the web tool
In the web tool, you can fill in the relevant details of your experiment, such as the refractive indices, the aperture angle of the objective, and the wavelength of the light used. The tool then displays the curve for the depth-dependent scaling factor. You can also export this data for your own use. Additionally, you can plot the result in combination with the result of each of the existing theories.
Reference: “Depth-dependent scaling of axial distances in light microscopy” by E. B. van der Wee, S. V. Loginov, M. N. F. Hensgens, D. B. Boltje and J. P. Hoogenboom, 19 April 2024, Optica.
DOI: doi:10.1364/OPTICA.520595
Be the first to comment on "Scientists Solve Decades-Old Microscopy Problem"