Scientists Use Real Data to Measure the Cosmos

Researchers Use Real Data to Measure the Cosmos

Illustration of the concept of Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations. Credit: Chris Blake & Sam Moorfield

Scientists from the Imperial College London have used data, rather than calculations related to general relativity, to measure large distances in the Universe for the first time.

A research team from Imperial College London and the University of Barcelona has used data from astronomical surveys to measure a standard distance that is central to our understanding of the expansion of the universe.

Previously the size of this ‘standard ruler’ has only been predicted from theoretical models that rely on general relativity to explain gravity at large scales. The new study is the first to measure it using observed data. A standard ruler is an object which consistently has the same physical size so that a comparison of its actual size to its size in the sky will provide a measurement of its distance to Earth.

“Our research suggests that current methods for measuring distance in the Universe are more complicated than they need to be,” said Professor Alan Heavens from the Department of Physics, Imperial College London who led the study. “Traditionally in cosmology, general relativity plays a central role in most models and interpretations. We have demonstrated that current data are powerful enough to measure the geometry and expansion history of the Universe without relying on calculations relating to general relativity.

“We hope this more data-driven approach, combined with an ever-increasing wealth of observational data, could provide more precise measurements that will be useful for future projects that are planning to answer major questions around the acceleration of the Universe and dark energy.”

The standard ruler measured in the research is the baryon acoustic oscillation scale. This is a pattern of a specific length which is imprinted in the clustering of matter created by small variations in density in the very early Universe (about 400,000 years after the Big Bang). The length of this pattern, which is the same today as it was then, is the baryon acoustic oscillation scale.

The team calculated the length to be 143 Megaparsecs (nearly 480 million light-years) which is similar to accepted predictions for this distance from models based on general relativity.

Published in Physical Review Letters, the findings of the research suggest it is possible to measure cosmological distances independently from models that rely on general relativity.

Einstein’s theory of general relativity replaced Newton’s law to become the accepted explanation of how gravity behaves at large scales. Many important astrophysics models are based on general relativity, including those dealing with the expansion of the Universe and black holes. However, some unresolved issues surround general relativity. These include its lack of reconciliation with the laws of quantum physics and the need for it to be extrapolated many orders of magnitude in scales in order to apply it in cosmological settings. No other physics laws have been extrapolated that much without needing any adjustment so its assumptions are still open to question.

Co-author of the study, Professor Raul Jimenez from the University of Barcelona said: “The uncertainties around general relativity have motivated us to develop methods to derive more direct measurements of the cosmos, rather than relying so heavily on inferences from models. For our study, we only made some minimal theoretical assumptions such as the symmetry of the Universe and a smooth expansion history.”

Co-author Professor Licia Verde from the University of Barcelona added: “There is a big difference between measuring distance and inferring its value indirectly. Usually, in cosmology, we can only do the latter and this is one of these rare and precious cases where we can directly measure distance. Most statements in cosmology assume general relativity works and does so on extremely large scales, which means we are often extrapolating figures out of our comfort zone. So it is reassuring to discover that we can make strong and important statements without depending on general relativity and which match previous statements. It gives one confidence that the observations we have of the Universe, as strange and puzzling as they might be, are realistic and sound!”

The research used current data from astronomical surveys on the brightness of exploding stars (supernovae) and on the regular pattern in the clustering of matter (baryonic acoustic oscillations) to measure the size of this ‘standard ruler’. The matter that created this standard ruler formed about 400,000 years after the Big Bang. This period was a time when the physics of the Universe was still relatively simple so the researchers did not need to consider more ‘exotic’ concepts such as dark energy in their measurements.

“In this study, we have used measurements that are very clean,” Professor Heavens explained, “And the theory that we do apply comes from a time relatively soon after the Big Bang when the physics was also clean. This means we have what we believe to be a precise method of measurement based on observations of the cosmos. Astrophysics is an incredibly active but changeable field and the support for the different models is liable to change. Even when models are abandoned, measurements of the cosmos will survive. If we can rely on direct measurements based on real observations rather than theoretical models then this is good news for cosmology and astrophysics.”

Reference: “Standard Rulers, Candles, and Clocks from the Low-Redshift Universe” by Alan Heavens, Raul Jimenez and Licia Verde, 11 December 2014, Physical Review Letters.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.241302

The research was supported by the Royal Society and the European Research Council.

1 Comment on "Scientists Use Real Data to Measure the Cosmos"

  1. Measuring anything with real data does not escape the Theory of the thing measured.

    What is the meaning of the size of the universe if its infinite or expanding.
    I can measure the red shift, but what does it mean an expansion or a gravitational refraction coefficient, n=c/v.

    Big Bang and the expansion of the universe maybe fictions.

    The Theory of gravity of the Universe is closer to Newton

    W = -mGM/r + cP = -vh/2pir + cmV = [-vh/l, cP]

    a Quaternion Energy with a scalar energy -vh/l and a 3D vector energy cmV=cP.

    The limits of the Universe is found by the Conservation of W.

    0 =XW =[d/dr,Del][-vh/l,cP] = [vp/r -cDel.P, cdP/dr -Del vh/l + cDelxP ]

    0 = [vp/r -cp/r,-1R cp/r + 1R vp/r] = cp/r(v/c -1)[1, 1R]= ma(v/c-1)[1,1R]

    The limits are at a=0 and v=c. I estimate the size of the universe is 150E24m at the max energy and minimum size.

    I estimate the energy 1.8225E70 and Age= 1/H = 15.84 GYears and Mass=2.025E53 kg.

    The universe has a minimum size radius R= 150E24m = 150/31 Mkpc.

    Hubbles Constant H = c/150E24 = 300Mm/s/150Mkpc/31= 62km/s/Mpc

    The red shift is v=HD = c D/R.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.