Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Chemistry»Scientists Were Cleaning Dirty Water – Then They Accidentally Solved a Fusion Energy Problem
    Chemistry

    Scientists Were Cleaning Dirty Water – Then They Accidentally Solved a Fusion Energy Problem

    By Cell PressMarch 22, 20254 Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Nuclear Fusion Reactor Illustration Art Concept
    A cleaner, mercury-free process to isolate lithium-6, a key fusion fuel ingredient, was discovered by accident using a water-filtering material. It could replace a decades-old toxic method and bring fusion energy closer to reality. Credit: SciTechDaily.com

    Scientists have discovered a mercury-free method to isolate lithium-6, a vital ingredient in nuclear fusion fuel.

    The breakthrough emerged by accident during water purification research and uses a material called zeta-vanadium oxide to selectively trap lithium-6 ions. The new method avoids the toxic COLEX process and has shown promising enrichment results in lab tests. Researchers now aim to scale the process to help power the future of clean energy.

    Mercury-Free Method Unlocks Lithium-6 for Fusion Fuel

    Lithium-6 is a key ingredient for producing fuel used in nuclear fusion, but separating it from the far more abundant lithium-7 typically requires liquid mercury, a highly toxic substance. Now, scientists have developed a mercury-free method that can isolate lithium-6 just as effectively as the traditional approach. Their findings were published on March 20 in the journal Chem, published by Cell Press.

    “This is a step towards addressing a major roadblock to nuclear energy,” says chemist and senior author Sarbajit Banerjee of ETH Zürich and Texas A&M University. “Lithium-6 is a critical material for the renaissance of nuclear energy, and this method could represent a viable approach to isotope separation.”

    Electrochemical 6-Lithium Isotope Enrichment
    Electrochemical 6-lithium isotope enrichment. Credit: Harris Kohl and Andrew Ezazi

    Toxic Legacy of COLEX and the Lithium-6 Shortage

    The standard technique to isolate lithium-6, known as the COLEX process, uses liquid mercury and has been banned in the U.S. since 1963 due to environmental and health concerns. Since then, U.S. research has relied on a limited stockpile of lithium-6 maintained at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee. Finding a safer, scalable method to isolate lithium-6 is essential for advancing nuclear fusion as a clean energy source.

    Interestingly, the new method was discovered by accident. The researchers were developing filtration membranes to clean “produced water,” a type of wastewater brought to the surface during oil and gas drilling, when they noticed the membranes were capturing unusually high amounts of lithium. That unexpected result led them to investigate further, ultimately uncovering a new way to separate lithium-6 without mercury.

    A Hunch Leads to Isotope Selectivity Testing

    “We saw that we could extract lithium quite selectively given that there was a lot more salt than lithium present in the water,” says Banerjee. “That led us to wonder whether this material might also have some selectivity for the 6-lithium isotope.”

    The membrane’s lithium-binding properties are due to a material called zeta-vanadium oxide (ζ-V2O5), a lab-synthesized inorganic compound that contains a framework of tunnels running in a single dimension.

    “Zeta-V2O5 has some pretty incredible properties—it’s an amazing battery material, and now we’re finding that it can trap lithium very selectively, even with isotopic selectivity,” says Banerjee.

    Electrochemical Cell Confirms Lithium-6 Capture

    To test whether the material could separate lithium-6 from lithium-7, the team set up an electrochemical cell with a zeta-V2O5 cathode. When they pumped an aqueous solution containing lithium ions through the cell while applying a voltage, the positively charged lithium ions were drawn towards the negatively charged zeta-V2O5 matrix and into its tunnels. Because lithium-6 and lithium-7 ions move differently, the zeta-V2O5 tunnels preferentially captured lithium-6 ions while the more mobile lithium-7 ions escaped capture.

    “Lithium-6 ions stick a lot stronger to the tunnels, which is the mechanism of selectivity,” says co-first author Andrew Ezazi of Texas A&M. “If you think of the bonds between V2O5 and lithium as a spring, you can imagine that lithium-7 is heavier and more likely to break that bond, whereas lithium-6, because it’s lighter, reverberates less and makes a tighter bond.”

    As lithium ions are integrated into the zeta-V2O5, the compound gradually changes color from bright yellow to dark olive green, which enables the degree of lithium isolation to be easily monitored.

    Reaching Fusion-Grade Lithium Without Mercury

    The team shows that a single electrochemical cycle enriched lithium-6 by 5.7%. To obtain fusion-grade lithium, which requires a minimum of 30% lithium-6, the process needs to be repeated 25 times, and 90% lithium-6 can be obtained in about 45 sequential cycles.

    “This level of enrichment is very competitive with the COLEX process, without the mercury,” says Ezazi.

    Toward Scalable, Cost-Effective Fusion Fuel

    “Of course, we’re not doing industrial production yet, and there are some engineering problems to overcome in terms of how to design the flow loop, but within a bunch of flow cycles, you can get fusion-grade lithium for quite cheap,” says Banerjee.

    The researchers say that their results suggest that materials like zeta-V2O5 could be used to isolate other substances, for example, to separate radioactive from non-radioactive isotopes.

    Now, the team is taking steps to scale their method up to an industrial level.

    “I think there’s a lot of interest in nuclear fusion as the ultimate solution for clean energy,” says Banerjee. “We’re hoping to get some support to build this into a practicable solution.”

    Reference: “Electrochemical 6Li isotope enrichment based on selective insertion in 1D tunnel-structured V2O5” by J. Luis Carrillo, Andrew A. Ezazi, Saul Perez-Beltran, Carlos A. Larriuz, Harris Kohl, Jaime A. Ayala, Arnab Maji, Stanislav Verkhoturov, Mohammed Al-Hashimi, Hassan Bazzi, Conan Weiland, Cherno Jaye, Daniel A. Fischer, Lucia Zuin, Jian Wang and Sarbajit Banerjee, 20 March 2025, Chem.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2025.102486

    This research was supported by the National Science Foundation, Texas A&M, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the National Research Council Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Government of Saskatchewan, the University of Saskatchewan, and the Qatar Research, Development and Innovation Council.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Cell Press Energy Fusion Fusion Energy Popular
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Refrigeration Hasn’t Changed in 70 Years – This Breakthrough Is Changing Everything

    69 Megajoules: JET Sets Fusion Energy World Record

    Nuclear Fusion Energy Breakthrough: Ignition Confirmed in Record 1.3 Megajoule Shot

    Solving a Riddle That Would Provide the World With Entirely Clean, Renewable Energy

    Turning Plastic Trash Into Treasure: Upcycling Plastic Into High-Quality Liquid Products

    Powered by Sunlight, ‘Artificial Leaf’ Successfully Produces Clean Gas From CO2 and Water

    Catalytic Reactor Turns Greenhouse Gas Into Pure Liquid Fuel

    A Big Step Forward for Nuclear Fusion Power

    NDCX-II, A Special-Purpose Particle Accelerator

    4 Comments

    1. John Sellers on March 22, 2025 8:19 pm

      Aren’t the filter material toxic with Lithium 7?

      My understanding there is more lithium 7 than the useful Lithium 6.

      So where does that go and is it really clean energy?

      Reply
      • Benson on March 27, 2025 12:47 am

        Vanadium is less toxic than mercury, it’s also far easier to handle being a room-temperature solid.
        They don’t say what they do with the Lithium-7, but I’m guessing there are uses for it somewhere and it just goes back into the supply chain.

        Reply
        • Michael King on July 27, 2025 10:34 pm

          Lithium is in demand for making rechargeable batteries – that’s one of the key uses for it.

          Reply
    2. Paul Giltz on March 24, 2025 8:09 am

      I enjoyed this. It was understandable to me even though I have no specialized knowledge of this subject.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    New Study Reveals Why Ozempic Works Better for Some People Than Others

    Climate Change Is Altering a Key Greenhouse Gas in a Way Scientists Didn’t Expect

    New Study Suggests Gravitational Waves May Have Created Dark Matter

    Scientists Discover Why the Brain Gets Stuck in Schizophrenia

    Scientists Engineer “Tumor-Eating” Bacteria That Devour Cancer From Within

    Even “Failed” Diets May Deliver Long-Term Health Gains, Study Finds

    NIH Scientists Discover Powerful New Opioid That Relieves Pain Without Dangerous Side Effects

    Collapsing Plasma May Hold the Key to Cosmic Magnetism

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • JWST Reveals a “Forbidden” Planet With a Baffling Composition
    • New Research Challenges 30-Year-Old Theory of Eye Development
    • The Protein “Sabotaging” Aging Muscle Recovery Could Be Key to Surviving Aging
    • This Diet–Gut Interaction Could Transform Fat Into a Calorie-Burning Machine
    • Why Some People Reach 100: New Study Reveals Key Biological Differences
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.