Faster Than a Speeding Photon: How Tachyons Challenge Modern Physics

Superluminal Motion Tachyons Art

Research on tachyons, particles theorized to move faster than light, has progressed significantly, revealing that prior inconsistencies within quantum mechanics stemmed from inadequate boundary conditions. A new framework, considering both past and future states, not only resolves these issues but suggests a novel type of quantum entanglement and positions tachyons as central to the formation of matter via Higgs field excitations. Credit: SciTechDaily.com

Recent advancements in tachyon theory have addressed past inconsistencies by incorporating both past and future states into the boundary conditions, leading to a new quantum entanglement theory and suggesting a critical role for tachyons in matter formation.

Tachyons are hypothetical particles that travel at speeds greater than the speed of light. These superluminal particles, are the “enfant terrible” of modern physics. Until recently, they were generally regarded as entities that did not fit into the special theory of relativity. However, a paper just published by physicists from the University of Warsaw and the University of Oxford has shown that many of these prejudices were unfounded. Tachyons are not only not ruled out by the theory, but allow us to understand its causal structure better.

Superluminal Motion and Tachyons

Motion at speeds beyond the speed of light is one of the most controversial issues in physics. Hypothetical particles that could move at superluminal speeds, called tachyons (from the Greek tachýs — fast, quick), are the ‘enfant terrible’ of modern physics. Until recently, they were widely regarded as creations that do not fit into the special theory of relativity.

Challenges to Tachyon Theory in Quantum Mechanics

At least three reasons for the non-existence of tachyons within quantum theory were known so far. The first: the ground state of the tachyon field was supposed to be unstable, which would mean that such superluminal particles would form `avalanches’. The second: a change in the inertial observer was supposed to lead to a change in the number of particles observed in his reference system, yet the existence of, say, seven particles cannot depend on who is looking at them. The third reason: the energy of the superluminal particles could take on negative values.

Meanwhile, a group of authors: Jerzy Paczos, pursuing his PhD at the University of Stockholm, Kacper Dębski, finishing his PhD at the Faculty of Physics, Szymon Cedrowski, a final-year Physics (Studies in English) student, and four more experienced researchers: Szymon Charzyński, Krzysztof Turzyński, Andrzej Dragan (all from Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw) and Artur Ekert from Oxford University, have just pointed out that the difficulties with tachyons so far had a common cause.

It turned out that the ‘boundary conditions’ that determine the course of physical processes include not only the initial state but also the final state of the system. The results of the international team of researchers have just been published in the prestigious journal Physical Review D.

A Breakthrough in Understanding Tachyons

To put it simply: in order to calculate the probability of a quantum process involving tachyons, it is necessary to know not only its past initial state but also its future final state. Once this fact was incorporated into the theory, all the difficulties mentioned earlier completely disappeared and tachyon theory became mathematically consistent. “It’s a bit like internet advertising — one simple trick can solve your problems,” says Andrzej Dragan, chief inspirer of the whole research endeavor.

“The idea that the future can influence the present instead of the present determining the future is not new in physics. However, until now, this type of view has at best been an unorthodox interpretation of certain quantum phenomena, and this time we were forced to this conclusion by the theory itself. To ‘make room’ for tachyons we had to expand the state space,” concludes Dragan.

Implications and Future of Tachyon Research

The authors also predict that the expansion of the boundary conditions has its consequences: a new kind of quantum entanglement appears in the theory, mixing past and future, which is not present in conventional particle theory. The paper also raises the question of whether tachyons described in this way are purely a ‘mathematical possibility’ or whether such particles are likely to be observed one day.

According to the authors, tachyons are not only a possibility but are, in fact, an indispensable component of the spontaneous breaking process responsible for the formation of matter. This hypothesis would mean that Higgs field excitations, before the symmetry was spontaneously broken, could travel at superluminal speeds in the vacuum.

Reference: “Covariant quantum field theory of tachyons” by Jerzy Paczos, Kacper Dębski, Szymon Cedrowski, Szymon Charzyński, Krzysztof Turzyński, Artur Ekert and Andrzej Dragan, 9 July 2024, Physical Review D.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.015006

1 Comment on "Faster Than a Speeding Photon: How Tachyons Challenge Modern Physics"

  1. Bao-hua ZHANG | July 30, 2024 at 2:55 am | Reply

    Faster Than a Speeding Photon: How Tachyons Challenge Modern Physics.
    VERY GOOD!

    As a scientific researcher, thought expression must be rigorous. The physical essence of the speed of light in the theory of relativity is spacetime synchronization.
    Please ask researchers to think deeply:
    What do you think is a faster speed than space-time synchronization?

    When you really think about it the rules (laws) of physics is actually very important. It almost runs through the entire process of scientific research. Scientific research guided by correct theories can help humanity avoid detours, failures, and pomposity.

    Please witness the exemplary collaboration between theoretical physicists and experimentalists (https://scitechdaily.com/microscope-spacecrafts-most-precise-test-of-key-component-of-the-theory-of-general-relativity/#comment-854286). Contemporary physics has always lived in a self righteous children’s story world. Whose values have been overturned by such a comical and ridiculous reality?

    In the superposition, deflection, and entanglement of topological vortices, the change of symmetry is always the Symmetry-Readjusted, not the Symmetry-Broken. The physical phenomena observed in scientific research are not precisely symmetrical. That’s because it’s difficult for us to observe the entirety of the world that is interactions and interconnections. Being in the world of spin wave interactions of topological vorties, any asymmetry is a local manifestation of overall symmetry adjustment.
    
    Misguided by the pseudo-scientific theory of Physical Review Letters (PRL), many researchers do not consider the similarities and differences between geometric shapes and physical reality in physics research, but indulge in imagination. Although scientific research can be imagined, it cannot be done recklessly.

    Spin creates everything, spin creates the world. The branch of mathematics known as topology has become a cornerstone of modern physics. The perpetually swirling topological vortices defy traditional physics’ expectations.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.