According to Scientists, Screen Time Isn’t the Problem – It’s Actually This

Teenagers on Smartphone Concept

The study found that the amount of time teenagers spend on screens, including watching videos, playing games, and using social media, does not significantly impact their self-esteem.

Despite concerns from many parents and caregivers that teenagers are spending too much time on their smartphones, video games, and social media, Keith Hampton, a professor at Michigan State University and director of academic research at the Quello Center, believes that screen time is not a cause for worry.

Instead, he is more concerned about adolescents who are disconnected due to limited access to the internet.

“Teens who are disconnected from today’s technologies are more isolated from their peers, which can lead to problems,” Hampton said. “Many young people are struggling with their mental health. While adolescents often grapple with self-esteem issues related to body image, peers, family, and school, disconnection is a much greater threat than screen time. Social media and video games are deeply integrated into youth culture, and they do more than entertain. They help kids to socialize, they contribute to identity formation and provide a channel for social support.”

Hampton and his colleagues study disconnection. For most teens, internet access is a part of their everyday life. These teens only experience disconnection when they choose to limit their device use or when their parents step in to control the time they spend online.

However, a large pocket of teens, living primarily in rural America, is disconnected for a very different reason. They live in households where there is an extremely weak infrastructure for broadband connectivity. These teens often have no internet access outside of school, very slow access at home, or spotty data coverage using a smartphone.

“Rural teens are the last remaining natural control group if we want insight into the mental health of adolescents who have no choice but to be disconnected from screens,” Hampton said.

In a peer-reviewed paper based on a survey of 3,258 rural adolescents, Hampton and his team compared the self-esteem and social activities of teens with no or poor home internet access to teens who are the heaviest users of screens as well as teens with parents who tightly control or limit their screen use. Here is what they found.

The single largest predictor of having lower self-esteem was, simply, being a girl. This was unsurprising, as the heavy toll of adolescence on young girls has been well established. The second largest determinant of self-esteem, for girls and boys, was poor grades in school.

Teens who had poor internet access at home and teens who had parents that exerted the most control over their media use also had substantively lower self-esteem — although only roughly half of the lower self-esteem experienced by a typical girl or those with low academic performance.

Keith Hampton, professor in the Department of Media and Information and director of Academic Research at the Center, discusses why teens being disconnected from the internet is a bigger issue than too much screen time. Hampton elaborates on why the internet can be a good thing for teens to stay connected to family and friends. Credit: Michigan State University

The amount of time teens spent on screens, whether it was watching videos, playing games, or using social media, did not play a big role in teens’ self-esteem. Even teens who were “excessive” users of screens reported higher self-esteem than those who were disconnected because they had poor internet access or their parents exerted a lot of control over their time online.

Why? Because media is deeply integrated into youth culture.

“Isolation doesn’t come from being online, it comes from being disconnected from those sources of entertainment and socialization that permeate teens’ lives,” Hampton said. “For most teens, that’s social media, video games, and sharing the videos they watch online. It is often how teens get their information, communicate and share.”

This does not mean that teens are not spending time socializing in person. Teens who spend more time using social media and watching videos spend more time socializing. Hampton found that every hour spent on social media was accompanied by 21 minutes spent with friends. “Excessive” users of screens were spending more time with family and friends.

“Perpetuating the myth that teens who spend more time on their devices spend less time with friends and family and that ‘excessive’ time online is harming most teens’ mental health, does more harm than good,” Hampton said. “When parents exert too much control over the time their teens spend on screens, they cut kids off from peers and the social support that protects mental health. While this survey was done prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, this work points to the terrible toll experienced by rural adolescents who were disconnected during the pandemic and the urgent need to address gaps in rural broadband infrastructure.”

Hampton said this does not imply that social media platforms are benign. There are real risks to mental health from online bullying and algorithms that focus teens on content that can be harmful. And some teens are more susceptible to harm than others.

Yet, this research shows that when parents have conversations with their teens about the risks of media use, focus on helping teens develop critical media skills, and give adolescents greater autonomy over their media use, teens report higher self-esteem.

“I advise parents to not focus on how long your teens spend on screens, but to take an interest in what your teens are doing online and spend time together,” Hampton said.

Reference: “Disconnection More Problematic for Adolescent Self-Esteem than Heavy Social Media Use: Evidence from Access Inequalities and Restrictive Media Parenting in Rural America” by Keith N. Hampton and Inyoung Shin, 5 August 2022, Social Science Computer Review.
DOI: 10.1177/08944393221117466

6 Comments on "According to Scientists, Screen Time Isn’t the Problem – It’s Actually This"

  1. The actual problem is the less time your kids face is in a screen the less time they have to influence and brainwash how your kids think and what they believe.

    Think I’m a “nutjob”?

    Go make an account, on all the major platforms, as a 13 year old girl.
    Make Google, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, etc…

    You will be shocked at what is shoved in your face.

  2. IMHO, pretty much ALL kinds of SOCIAL MEDIA is harmful & dangerous to children & teenagers (as they cause addiction & sleep & attention/focus problems & bullying, exploitation, manipulation etc)!
    & ONLY true/realistic/effective/permanent solution would be banning social media usage/membership for ALL underage people (by national/global law(s))!!

    • I agree. This article must be sponsored by social media. Having four children living at home and seeing how screen time causes isolation from real life interactions is proof. Go outside and play!

    • Did you actually read the article? It contradicts almost every point that you and others have made here. He bases his opinions on studies involving more than 3,000 adolescents. How many adolescents do you base your opinions on? I’m not impressed by the people who express their different opinions by trying to discredit the writer. Do you have any evidence or experience that would support your opinion?

  3. Great article. Im sure Tennis guy and FB 36 who left the above comments think cigarettes and church are the best teen influences.

  4. I am a retired teacher, school counselor and hosteller. At breakfast all grimly focus on their screens. Perhaps lonely, mussing friends and families. I introduce mysef to occupants at my table and before long a crowd gathers round laughing, chatting , introducing themselves, offering recommendations, from then on the ice is broken, they are more relaxed. This is the way hostellers behaved in my youth. In meeting we received an international education. There are many ways to expand as a human being. Isn’t it all wonderful?

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.