Research from the University of Exeter indicates that visual illusions result from our eyes and brain’s neural limitations rather than complex mental processes. The study’s model successfully predicts human visual illusions and explains our ability to perceive high-contrast images, like those on high-definition TVs, despite our neurons’ limited bandwidth.
Numerous visual illusions are caused by limits in the way our eyes and visual neurons work – rather than more complex psychological processes, new research shows.
Researchers examined illusions in which an object’s surroundings affect the way we see its color or pattern.
Scientists and philosophers have long debated whether these illusions are caused by neural processing in the eye and low-level visual centers in the brain, or involve higher-level mental processes such as context and prior knowledge.
In the new study Dr. Jolyon Troscianko, from the University of Exeter, co-developed a model that suggests simple limits to neural responses – not deeper psychological processes – explain these illusions.
“Our eyes send messages to the brain by making neurons fire faster or slower,” said Dr. Troscianko, from the Centre for Ecology and Conservation on Exeter’s Penryn Campus in Cornwall.
“However, there’s a limit to how quickly they can fire, and previous research hasn’t considered how the limit might affect the ways we see color.”
The model combines this “limited bandwidth” with information on how humans perceive patterns at different scales, together with an assumption that our vision performs best when we are looking at natural scenes.
The model was developed by researchers from the Universities of Exeter and Sussex to predict how animals see color, but it was also found to correctly predict many visual illusions seen by humans.
“This throws into the air a lot of long-held assumptions about how visual illusions work,” Dr. Troscianko said.
He said the findings also shed light on the popularity of high-definition televisions.
“Modern high dynamic range televisions create bright white regions that are over 10,000 times brighter than their darkest black, approaching the contrast levels of natural scenes,” Dr. Troscianko added.
“How our eyes and brains can handle this contrast is a puzzle because tests show that the highest contrasts we humans can see at a single spatial scale is around 200:1.
“Even more confusingly, the neurons connecting our eyes to our brains can only handle contrasts of about 10:1.
“Our model shows how neurons with such limited contrast bandwidth can combine their signals to allow us to see these enormous contrasts, but the information is ‘compressed’ – resulting in visual illusions.
“The model shows how our neurons are precisely evolved to use of every bit of capacity.
“For example, some neurons are sensitive to very tiny differences in grey levels at medium-sized scales, but are easily overwhelmed by high contrasts.
“Meanwhile, neurons coding for contrasts at larger or smaller scales are much less sensitive, but can work over a much wider range of contrasts, giving deep black-and-white differences.
“Ultimately this shows how a system with a severely limited neural bandwidth and sensitivity can perceive contrasts larger than 10,000:1.”
The paper, published in the journal PLOS Computational Biology, is entitled: “A model of colour appearance based on efficient coding of natural images.”
Reference: “A model of colour appearance based on efficient coding of natural images” by Jolyon Troscianko and Daniel Osorio, 15 June 2023, PLOS Computational Biology.