Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Earth»Fracking Wastewater Injection Wells Linked to Earthquakes
    Earth

    Fracking Wastewater Injection Wells Linked to Earthquakes

    By SciTechDailyDecember 19, 20121 Comment2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit

    hydrofracking-USA

    Scientists presented evidence tying the disposal of wastewater from shale gas hydrofracking to an increased occurrence of earthquakes.

    The scientists presented their findings at the American Geophysical Union fall meeting. Some US states, like Oklahoma, Texas, and Colorado have experienced a significant rise in seismic activity in the last few years, coinciding with a recent boom in fracking, a process that forces gas from harder to reach underground deposits by injecting water and chemicals into shale rock.

    Fracking produces large quantities of wastewater, which is typically disposed of in deep wells. There is still a debate whether the disposal of this wastewater can cause unusual seismic activity and most states don’t consider earthquake risks when allowing drilling companies to dispose of large quantities of chemical-laden drilling water.

    Hydrofracking produces much more wastewater than conventional oil and gas drilling. The wastewater injection wells, which are often the cheapest disposal option for drilling companies, are the main culprits for the increased seismic activity.

    90% of the fracking wastewater in the USA is disposed in injection wells. Since 2010, Oklahoma residents have felt more than 250 quakes, significantly more than the one to three per year that had been the norm for decades.

    The largest quake in the state’s history, a 5.7 magnitude, damaged 200 buildings and was likely a result caused by fluid injection. Aftershocks were mapped to fault patterns to indicate how pressure built up over time from wastewater from different fracking operations.

    Other USGS scientists looked at a series of earthquakes since 2001 in the Colorado and New Mexico Raton Basin. They also concluded that these quakes were also the result of wastewater injections, finding that the likelihood that a rise in the rate of naturally occurring quakes greater than a magnitude 3.0 is extremely low.

    Hydrofracking has become more common in the last ten years, and oil as well as gas drillers have used tens of thousands of injection wells in these regions. It’s difficult to pinpoint the exact causes of the trends because most of the studies have looked at individual earthquakes and some injection wells seem to cause quakes, while others do not.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Earthquakes Fracking Geophysics Seismology
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Unprecedented 120-Year Kīlauea Study Reveals Hidden Patterns Beneath Hawaii’s Biggest Island

    Baffling Scientists: Why Did Millions of People Feel Shaking in New York City?

    Deformation Imaging: Revolutionizing Our View of Earth’s Subterranean Mysteries

    Space Detection of Earthly Anomalies: Groundbreaking New Technique Unveils Early Earthquake Signs

    Scientists Discover Source of Mysterious Earth Tremors

    Seismic Signals From Space: Intriguing Correlation Between Earthquakes and Cosmic Radiation Discovered

    Revolutionizing Disaster Prevention: New Earthquake Prediction Model Unveiled by Scientists

    Predicting Earthquakes: Slight Shifts in Magnetic Field Preceded California Quakes

    Quake-Ception – Groundbreaking Earthquake Discovery: Risk Models Overlook an Important Element

    1 Comment

    1. Michele R Walford on September 11, 2024 8:34 pm

      Hello.
      Why no actual writer(s) credit? Why no quotes from the scientists who attended the fall meeting mentioned?
      Seems really suspicious.
      Even though I believe that what is said in the article is true, I would never share this unattributed, unsourced article.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Study Finds Exercise May Be a Surprisingly Powerful Treatment for Pain

    New Research Reveals Dinosaurs May Have Eaten Seaweed

    Don’t Miss: Saturn, Halley’s Comet Meteors and the Seven Sisters Light Up October

    Could Vitamin C Help Stop Leukemia Before It Starts?

    AI May Seem Human-Like, but That Doesn’t Mean People Think It’s Conscious

    Study Finds Natural Dairy Trans Fats Behave Very Differently From Industrial Fats

    Your Voice May Reveal How Fast Your Brain Is Aging

    These Fingernail-Sized Animals Are Moving Astonishing Amounts of California Beach Sand

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • NASA’s SpaceX Crew‑12 Splashes Down After 237 Days and 100 Million Miles in Orbit
    • Look Up: Dragon Fireballs, Disappearing Planets, Hunter’s Moon Fill October’s Spooky Skies
    • Hubble Spots a Bizarre Galaxy Whose Center Rotates Sideways
    • Scientists Reveal a Staggering $12 Trillion Potential Hidden in the World’s Oyster Reefs
    • A New Discovery Could Bring Scientists Closer to Healing Damaged Tendons
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.