Leonardo da Vinci Was Wrong – Scientists Disprove “Rule of Trees”

Glowing Tree Math

A new study reveals that Leonardo da Vinci’s ‘Rule of Trees’, previously adopted by science to model tree function, is not accurate for the internal vascular structures of trees. The research suggests that the misalignment of this rule with tree vascular systems may explain why larger trees are more susceptible to drought and climate change.

A new method for measuring carbon uptake in trees highlights the potential vulnerability of large trees to drought conditions.

Leonardo da Vinci’s ‘Rule of Trees’ for illustrating trees has been largely adopted by science when modeling trees and how they function.

Now, researchers from Bangor University in the UK and the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) have found that this rule contradicts those that regulate the internal structures of trees.

Da Vinci’s interest in drawing led him to look at the size ratios of different objects, including trees, so that he could create more accurate representations of them. To correctly represent trees, he perceived a so-called ‘Rule of trees’ which states that “all the branches of a tree at every stage of its height are equal in thickness to the trunk when put together.”

Trees by the Gein Moonrise

Trees by the Gein- Moonrise by Piet Mondrian (drawing). Credit: Piet Mondrian, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

It had been thought that Leonardo’s ‘Rule of Trees’ could also be applied to the vascular channels that transport water through a tree, with the individual channel sizes decreasing at the same ratio, as branches become narrower, while still adding up to the trunk’s volume. This ‘rule’ had been accepted as part of metabolic scaling theory.

But scientists from Bangor University and SLU publishing in the prestigious peer-reviewed journal PNAS, have shown that this model isn’t exactly correct when applied to the internal vascular structures of trees.

Hydraulic resistance

For water and nutrients to move efficiently through the tree, from root to leaf tip, the vascular system has to maintain ‘hydraulic resistance’.

Ruben Valbuena and Stuart Sopp of Bangor University and SLU have calculated that for hydraulic resistance to work, there comes a point where the ‘Rule of Trees’ can no longer hold true.

In order to efficiently transport liquids from roots to leaf tips, a tree’s vascular channels need to maintain a certain dimension to maintain hydraulic resistance. Therefore, the plant has to reduce its volume as it reaches its extremities, causing a higher ratio of the capillary to the surrounding plant mass.

Verso A Tree Leonardo da Vinci

Verso A tree Leonardo da Vinci, c.1500. Credit: Leonardo da Vinci, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

As Dr. Ruben Valbuena (Honorary Professor at Bangor University and now Professor at SLU) explains, “While a great ‘tip’ for artists, which is what Da Vinci intended, Leonardo’s Rule of trees does not hold up at the micro level. We believe our calculations further refine metabolic scaling theory and improve our understanding of the plant system as a whole. Our re-calculations may also explain why large trees are more susceptible to drought, and may also be at a greater vulnerability to climate change.”

Co-author Stuart Sopp, currently studying for his PhD in Environmental Science at Bangor University said: “One of our aims was to produce a ratio which could be used to estimate tree biomass and carbon in forests. This new ratio will assist in calculating global carbon capture by trees.”

Reference: “Vascular optimality dictates plant morphology away from Leonardo’s rule” by S. B. D. Sopp and R. Valbuena, 18 September 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2215047120

6 Comments on "Leonardo da Vinci Was Wrong – Scientists Disprove “Rule of Trees”"

  1. Why are you “disproving” something Da Vinci never said, nor intended to say? His statement was for the sake of artists and their use of perspective to provide balance in their art. That botanists and biologists misused his artistic insights is not the same as “Leonardo Da Vinci Was Wrong.”

  2. Contemporary science likes to state a lot of things and is frequently incorrect. The teardown and defamation of ancient knowledge or persons is apparent today. Imagine the mental aptitude of whoever wrote that misleading headline.

  3. thanks alot of information keren

  4. You maniacs are nuts. They only disproved what was inferred from his work, not his work.

  5. Lives in reality not fantisyland | September 26, 2023 at 4:34 pm | Reply

    Since when has any branch of science used the phrase rule of trees. If you knew anything about science you might understand just how not scientific your claims are and how no one with a study of science has a clue what your talking about becuse its pure madeup gibberish. Unless this is woke science from some canceal culture rewrite of history. Who publishes this crap. How dare you claim this to be science un any way.

  6. Stupid article. If the science community applied drawing instructions to scientific analysis; how does that make DiVinci wrong?

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.