A new and surprising duality has been found in theoretical particle physics. The duality exists between two types of scattering processes that can occur in the proton collisions made in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN in Switzerland and France. Surprisingly, the fact that this link can be made indicates that there is something in the fine intricacies of the standard model of particle physics that is not entirely understood. The standard model is a subatomic-scale picture of the world that describes all particles and their interactions, so when surprises occur, there is cause for attention. The scientific article has now been published in the journal *Physical Review Letters*.

#### Duality in physics

The notion of duality occurs in different areas of physics. The most well-known duality is arguably the particle-wave duality in quantum mechanics. The classic double-slit experiment demonstrates how light acts as a wave, but Albert Einstein received his Nobel Prize for demonstrating how light behaves as a particle.

The strange thing is that light is actually *both and neither of the two* at the same time. There are simply two ways we can look at this entity, light, and each comes with a mathematical description. Both with a completely different intuitive idea, but still describe the same thing.

“What we have now found is a similar duality,” Matthias Wilhelm, Assistant Professor at the Niels Bohr International Academy, explains. “We calculated the prediction for one scattering process and for another scattering process.

Our current calculations are less experimentally tangible than the famous double-slit experiment, but there is a clear mathematical map between the two, and it shows that they both contain the same information. They are linked, somehow.”

#### Theory and experiments go hand in hand

At the Large Hadron Collider, we collide a lot of protons – in these protons there are a lot of smaller particles, the subatomic particles gluons and quarks.

In the collision, two gluons from different protons can interact and new particles are created, such as the Higgs particle, resulting in intricate patterns in the detectors.

We map how these patterns look, and the theoretical work done in relation to the experiments aims to describe precisely what goes on in mathematical terms, in order to create an overall formulation, as well as to make predictions that can be compared to the results of the experiments.

About CERNCERN is an acronym for Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire, and the aim was to benefit from sharing the expenses this type of research entails – something that would be too costly for a single country to bear.

There are presently 23 member states. But equally important was the international openness and the peaceful sharing of scientific progress in our knowledge about our world.

“We calculated the scattering process for two gluons interacting to produce four gluons, as well as the scattering process for two gluons interacting to produce a gluon and a Higgs particle, both in a slightly simplified version of the standard model.

To our surprise, we discovered that the results of these two calculations are related. A classical case of duality. Somehow, the answer for how likely it is for one scattering process to happen carries within it the answer for how likely it is for the other scattering process to happen.

The strange thing about this duality is that we don’t know why this relation between the two different scattering processes exists. We are mixing two very different physical properties of the two predictions, and we see the relation, but it is still a bit of a mystery wherein the connection lies,” Matthias Wilhelm says.

#### The duality principle and the application of it

According to current understanding, the two should not be connected – but with the discovery of this surprising duality, the only proper way to react to it is to investigate further.

Surprises always signify that there is something we now know that we don’t understand. After the discovery of the Higgs particle in 2012, no new, sensational particles have been discovered. The way we hope to detect new physics now is by making very precise predictions on what we expect to happen, then comparing them with very precise measurements of what nature shows us, and seeing if we can find deviations there.

Niels Bohr and CERNNiels Bohr was among the visionary researchers who, by the end of the 1940s, initiated the creation of an international research institution, which would allow researchers to collaborate on uncovering “what the universe is made of and how it works,” as the CERN mission states.

The idea was and continues to be to push the boundaries for our knowledge on the world we live in.

We need a lot of accuracy, both experimentally and theoretically. But with more precision comes harder calculations. “So where this could be leading is working in order to see if this duality can be used to get a sort of “mileage” out of it, because one calculation is simpler than the other – but still it gives the answer to the more complicated calculation,” Matthias Wilhelm explains.

“So if we can settle for using the simple calculation we may use the duality to answer the question that would otherwise require more complicated calculations – But then we really need to understand the duality.

It is important to note, though, that we are not there yet. But usually, the questions that arise from unexpected behavior of things are a lot more interesting than an orderly and expected outcome.”

Reference: “Folding Amplitudes into Form Factors: An Antipodal Duality” by Lance J. Dixon, Ömer Gürdogan, Andrew J. McLeod and Matthias Wilhelm, 15 March 2022, *Physical Review Letters*.

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.111602

… let’s wait and see what will come out of this…

Even under circumstances where the collision of particles produces Joliet a new one we’re not allowing for the fact that all interactions have an equal and opposite reaction hence the higgs boson particle producers still yet another reaction that you’re not catching or maybe you have but it is an equal opposite reaction,a well proven theory in physics . Sometimes the answers right there in front of your face but it seems too simplistic therefore is rejected

The two types of scattering results bearing same value of total energy,before or after the scattering,follows the principle of conservation of energy.In first type of scattering process natural law of impact between two gluons ìs observed to produce resultant 2×2=4 gluons.In second case,after scattering the same two gluons are glued togather to produce a higgs boson and a gluon.

Two scattering gluons are impacted to give two equally likelly cases.In one case 2×2=4 gluons are produced.In next case a resultant gulon with a higgs boson is generated due to coagullation.

A photon is a spherical ripple in spacetime caused buy the implosion of an electron dropping orbital. The orbital shrinks, space rushes in creating a spherical ripple which expands from origin as c. The entire probability sphere of photon is the actual physical thing.

Mathematics is the language in which humans write the universe. Mathematics does not tell humans that elementary particles must be spherical, but can be unipolar. This suggests that elementary particles may be two-dimensional matter.

In particle physics, an elementary particle or fundamental particle is not composed of other particles. Dirac equation predicted every elementary particle in the universe has an antiparticle – its identical twin but with opposite charge.

That is to say, elementary particles have the following physical characteristics:

1. It is not composed of other particles.

2. It is a pair by particles and its identical anti-particles.

However, there are no evidences that the particles currently thought to be elementary include the fundamental fermions (quarks, leptons, antiquarks, and antileptons), as well as the fundamental bosons (gauge bosons and the Higgs boson), must be the elementary particles undoubtedly. If they are composed of other particles, they will only be microscopic particles, not the elementary particles.

According to the modern discoveries in physics, fundamental forces and elementary particles can be written in terms of a pair of physical and virtual fields.

In physics, topological vortex and anti-vortex fields always appear in pairs. They perfectly reflect the exact symmetry under the simultaneous transformation of parity conservation (P), charge conjugation (C) and time reversal (T).

Topological vortex and anti-vortex field pairs can generate or annihilate at the limit points, and encounter, split or merge at the bifurcation points of the 3-dimensional vector order parameter, and form topological bifurcations by unstable point defects system. This means that the topological bifurcations can be the fundamental understructure of various microscopic particles. Topological vortex and anti-vortex field pairs had all the physical characteristics of elementary particles.

Elementary particles are the foundation of all things. In the presence of dissipation they can form microscopic particles in many forms. Parity conservation (P), charge conjugation (C) and time reversal (T) are the nature feature of elementary particles. As one of the microscopic particles, θ and τ are composed of elementary particles. The parity conservation of θ and τ only allows each of them respond to external forces as an independent whole, is not whether they are symmetric. There are no evidences to support that θ and τ are the same particle or mirror images of each other in nature.

Mathematics is the language in which humans write the universe. Mathematics does not tell humans that elementary particles must be spherical, but can be unipolar. This suggests that elementary particles can be a rotating two-dimensional matter.

Any guess, assumption, speculation or conjecture that deviates from and distorts mathematics, no matter what person or institution it comes from, is pseudoscience.

What, pray, if physical science deviates from mathematics seriously, can it still be called science? What else does such science deserve public respect?