A new study from the University of British Columbia reveals that the early loss of radioactive heat-producing elements such as uranium and potassium helped put our planet on the evolutionary path to sustain life.
Compared to its celestial neighbors Venus and Mars, Earth is a pretty habitable place. So how did we get so lucky?
The research, published in Nature Geoscience, suggests that Earth’s first crust, which was rich in radioactive heat-producing elements such as uranium and potassium, was torn from the planet and lost to space when asteroids bombarded the planet early in its history. This phenomenon, known as impact erosion, helps explain a landmark discovery made over a decade ago about the Earth’s composition.
Researchers with the University of British Columbia and University of California, Santa Barbara say that the early loss of these two elements ultimately determined the evolution of Earth’s plate tectonics, magnetic field, and climate.
“The events that define the early formation and bulk composition of Earth govern, in part, the subsequent tectonic, magnetic and climatic histories of our planet, all of which have to work together to create the Earth in which we live,” said Mark Jellinek, a professor in the Department of Earth, Ocean & Atmospheric Sciences at UBC. “It’s these events that potentially differentiate Earth from other planets.”
On Earth, shifting tectonic plates cause regular overturning of Earth’s surface, which steadily cools the underlying mantle, maintains the planet’s strong magnetic field, and stimulates volcanic activity. Erupting volcanoes release greenhouse gases from deep inside the planet and regular eruptions help to maintain the habitable climate that distinguishes Earth from all other rocky planets.
Venus is the most similar planet to Earth in terms of size, mass, density, gravity and composition. While Earth has had a stable and habitable climate over geological time, Venus is in a climate catastrophe with a thick carbon dioxide atmosphere and surface temperatures reaching about 470 C (880 F). In this study, Jellinek and Matt Jackson, an associate professor at the University of California, explain why the two planets could have evolved so differently.
“Earth could have easily ended up like present-day Venus,” said Jellinek. “A key difference that can tip the balance, however, may be differing extents of impact erosion.”
With less impact erosion, Venus would cool episodically with catastrophic swings in the intensity of volcanic activity driving dramatic and billion-year-long swings in climate.
“We played out this impact erosion story forward in time and we were able to show that the effect of the conditions governing the initial composition of a planet can have profound consequences for its evolution,” Jellinek said. “It’s a very special set of circumstances that make Earth.”
Reference: “Connections between the bulk composition, geodynamics and habitability of Earth” by A. M. Jellinek and M. G. Jackson, 20 July 2015, Nature Geoscience.
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2488
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
1 Comment
Perhaps the ‘impact erosion’ was just a minor contributor?
If the asteroid belt was a planet that exploded, not just a failed planet that somehow directed its planetesimals to Earth — and that could well be the case–our Earth could have also suffered a cataclysmic event that led to internal gases expanding and ‘blew out’ a significant fraction of the mantle, leading to a thinner-than-normal crust that is able to subduct leading to volcanism, leading our atmosphere, leading to life.