Tetraamine-modified MOFs remove 90% of CO2 more efficiently and cheaply.
big advance in carbon capture technology could provide an efficient and inexpensive way for natural gas power plants to remove carbon dioxide from their flue emissions, a necessary step in reducing greenhouse gas emissions to slow global warming and climate change.
Developed by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and ExxonMobil, the new technique uses a highly porous material called a metal-organic framework, or MOF, modified with nitrogen-containing amine molecules to capture the CO2 and low temperature steam to flush out the CO2 for other uses or to sequester it underground.
In experiments, the technique showed a six times greater capacity for removing CO2 from flue gas than current amine-based technology, and it was highly selective, capturing more than 90% of the CO2 emitted. The process uses low temperature steam to regenerate the MOF for repeated use, meaning less energy is required for carbon capture.
“For CO2 capture, steam stripping — where you use direct contact with steam to take off the CO2 — has been a sort of holy grail for the field. It is rightly seen as the cheapest way to do it,” said senior researcher Jeffrey Long, UC Berkeley professor of chemistry and of chemical and biomolecular engineering and senior faculty scientist at Berkeley Lab. “These materials, at least from the experiments we have done so far, look very promising.”
Because there’s little market for most captured CO2, power plants would likely pump most of it back into the ground, or sequester it, where it would ideally turn into rock. The cost of scrubbing the emissions would have to be facilitated by government policies, such as carbon trading or a carbon tax, to incentivize CO2 capture and sequestration, something many countries have already implemented.
The work was funded by ExxonMobil, which is working with both the Berkeley group and Long’s start-up, Mosaic Materials Inc., to develop, scale up and test processes for stripping CO2 from emissions.
Long is the senior author of a paper describing the new technique that was published in the July 24, 2020, issue of the journal Science.
“We were able to take the initial discovery and, through research and testing, derive a material that in lab experiments has shown the potential to not only capture CO2 under the extreme conditions present in flue gas emissions from natural gas power plants, but to do so with no loss in selectivity,” said co-author Simon Weston, senior research associate and the project lead at ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co. “We have shown that these new materials can then be regenerated with low-grade steam for repeated use, providing a pathway for a viable solution for carbon capture at scale.”
Carbon dioxide emissions by fossil fuel-burning vehicles, electricity generating plants and industry account for an estimated 65% of the greenhouse gases driving climate change, which has already increased Earth’s average temperature by 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degree Celsius) since the 19th century. Without a decrease in these emissions, climate scientists predict ever hotter temperatures, more erratic and violent storms, several feet of sea level rise and resulting droughts, floods, fires, famine and conflict.
“In reality, of the kinds of things that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says we need to do to control global warming, CO2 capture is a huge part,” Long said. “We don’t have a use for most of the CO2 that we need to stop emitting, but we have to do it.”
Power plants strip CO2 from flue emissions today by bubbling flue gases through organic amines in water, which bind and extract the carbon dioxide. The liquid is then heated to 120-150 C (250-300 F) to release the CO2 gas, after which the liquids are reused. The entire process consumes about 30% of the power generated. Sequestering the captured CO2 underground costs an additional, though small, fraction of that.
Six years ago, Long and his group in UC Berkeley’s Center for Gas Separations, which is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, discovered a chemically modified MOF that readily captures CO2 from concentrated power plant flue emissions, potentially reducing the capture cost by half. They added diamine molecules to a magnesium-based MOF to catalyze the formation of polymer chains of CO2 that could then be purged by flushing with a humid stream of carbon dioxide.
Because MOFs are very porous, in this case like a honeycomb, an amount the weight of a paper clip has an internal surface area equal to that of a football field, all available for adsorbing gases.
A major advantage of the amine-appended MOFs is that the amines can be tweaked to capture CO2 at different concentrations, ranging from the 12% to 15% typical of coal plant emissions to the 4% typical of natural gas plants, or even the much lower concentrations in ambient air. Mosaic Materials, which Long co-founded and directs, was created to make this technique available widely to power and industrial plants.
But the 180 C stream of water and CO2 needed to flush the captured CO2 eventually drives off the diamine molecules, shortening the life of the material. The new version uses four amine molecules — a tetraamine — that is much more stable at high temperatures and in the presence of steam.
“The tetraamines are so strongly bound within the MOF that we can use a very concentrated stream of water vapor with zero CO2, and if you tried that with the previous adsorbents, the steam would start destroying the material,” Long said.
They showed that direct contact with steam at 110-120 C — a bit above the boiling point of water — works well to flush out the CO2. Steam at that temperature is readily available in natural gas power plants, whereas the 180 C CO2-water mix required to regenerate the earlier modified MOF necessitated heating, which wastes energy.
When Long, Weston and their colleagues first thought about replacing diamines with tougher tetraamines, it seemed like a long shot. But crystal structures of the diamine-containing MOFs suggested that there could be ways of connecting two diamines to form a tetraamine while preserving the ability of the material to polymerize CO2. When UC Berkeley graduate student Eugene Kim, the paper’s first author, chemically created the tetraamine-appended MOF, it outperformed the diamine-appended MOF on the first try.
The researchers subsequently studied the structure of the modified MOF using Berkeley Lab’s Advanced Light Source, revealing that the CO2 polymers that line the pores of the MOF are actually linked by the tetraamines, like a ladder with tetraamines as the rungs. First-principles density functional theory calculations using the Cori supercomputer in Berkeley Lab’s National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), computing resources at the Molecular Foundry and resources provided by the campus’s Berkeley Research Computing program confirmed this remarkable structure that Long’s team had initially envisioned.
“I have been doing research at Cal for 23 years now, and this is one of those times where you have what seemed like a crazy idea, and it just worked right away,” Long said.
Reference: “Cooperative carbon capture and steam regeneration with tetraamine-appended metal–organic frameworks” by Eugene J. Kim, Rebecca L. Siegelman, Henry Z. H. Jiang, Alexander C. Forse, Jung-Hoon Lee, Jeffrey D. Martell, Phillip J. Milner, Joseph M. Falkowski, Jeffrey B. Neaton, Jeffrey A. Reimer, Simon C. Weston and Jeffrey R. Long, 24 July 2020, Science.
Co-authors with Long, Kim and Weston are Joseph Falkowski from ExxonMobil; Rebecca Siegelman, Henry Jiang, Alexander Forse, Jeffrey Martell, Phillip Milner, Jeffrey Reimer and Jeffrey Neaton from UC Berkeley; and Jung-Hoon Lee from Berkeley Lab. Neaton and Reimer also are faculty senior scientists at Berkeley Lab.
Granted, CO2 remains in the atmosphere for decades where it contributes to the greenhouse effect. Nevetheless, water vapor is a more potent albeit more transient, greenhouse gas. If one burns CH4 or longer chain hydrocarbons like gasoline, considerable water vapor results. Short term, burning less Carbon and Hydrocarbons results in less CO2 and less H2O. Reducing heating and cooling demand by better insulating buildings and other efficiency improvements is a quick and technically easy step towards less burning and fewer nukes. Comfort is increased, Impacts on low income and colored communities are improved. Jobs are created. Ne need for new technology or research. Same goes for solar water heating which is 3X more efficient than PV and has benign storage in the form of water tanks. So frustrating to see the first, best steps ignored by goveernment and media.
It is often pointed out that water has a relatively short residency in the atmosphere as a way of dismissing its effect. However, it is continually replenished downwind from water bodies, or transpiring vegetation surfaces. Thus, while it is highly variable in concentration, it is only negligible in high (polar) latitudes and hot deserts. Therefore, one should really be concerned about the warming efficiency of a gas found in concentrations up to 4% (WV) versus 0.04% (CO2).