Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Technology»Nuclear Fusion: Building a Star on Earth Is Hard – We Need Better Materials
    Technology

    Nuclear Fusion: Building a Star on Earth Is Hard – We Need Better Materials

    By Aneeqa Khan, University of ManchesterApril 18, 202125 Comments6 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Futuristic Power Plant Concept
    Futuristic power plant concept.

    Fusion reactors push material limits with extreme heat and radiation. Advances in steels and magnets are promising, but real-world testing and industrial scaling are essential.

    Nuclear fusion is the process that powers the Sun and all other stars. During fusion, the nuclei of two atoms are brought close enough together that they fuse together, releasing huge amounts of energy.

    Replicating this process on Earth has the potential to deliver almost limitless electricity with virtually zero carbon emissions and greater safety, and without the same level of nuclear waste as fission.

    But building what is essentially a mini star on Earth and holding it together inside a reactor is not an easy task. It requires immense temperatures and pressures and extremely strong magnetic fields.

    Right now we don’t quite have materials capable of withstanding these extremes. But researchers like me are working to develop them, and we’ve found some exciting things along the way.

    Tokamaks

    There are many ways to contain nuclear fusion reactions on Earth, but the most common uses a doughnut-shaped device called a tokamak. Inside the tokamak, the fuels for the reaction – isotopes of hydrogen called deuterium and tritium – are heated until they become a plasma. A plasma is when the electrons in the atoms have enough energy to escape the nuclei and start to float around. Because it’s made up of electrically charged particles, unlike a normal gas, it can be contained in a magnetic field. This means it doesn’t touch the reactor sides – instead, it floats in the middle in a doughnut shape.

    Fusion Reactor Tokamak
    Inside a tokamak fusion reactor.

    When deuterium and tritium have enough energy they fuse together, creating helium, neutrons and releasing energy. The plasma has to reach temperatures of 100 million degrees Celsius for large amounts of fusion to happen – ten times hotter than the center of the Sun. It has to be much hotter because the Sun has a much higher density of particles.

    Although it’s mostly contained within a magnetic field, the reactor still has to withstand huge temperatures. At Iter, the world’s biggest fusion experiment, expected to be built by 2035, the hottest part of the machine would reach around 1,300℃ (2,370F).

    While the plasma will mostly be contained in a magnetic field, there are times when the plasma might collide with the walls of the reactor. This can result in erosion, fuel being implanted in the walls and modifications to the material properties.

    On top of the extreme temperatures, we also have to consider the by-products of the fusion reaction of deuterium and tritium, like extremely high energy neutrons. Neutrons have no charge so can’t be contained by the magnetic field. This means they hit against the walls of the reactor, causing damage.

    The Breakthroughs

    All these incredibly complex challenges have contributed to huge advances in materials over the years. One of the most notable has been high temperature superconducting magnets, which are being used by various different fusion projects. These behave as superconductors at temperatures below the boiling point of liquid nitrogen. While this sounds cold, it’s high compared to the much colder temperatures other superconductors need.

    Nuclear Fusion Reaction
    Deuterium tritium fusion.

    In fusion, these magnets are only meters away from the high temperatures inside the tokamak, creating an enormously large temperature gradient. These magnets have the potential to generate much stronger magnetic fields than conventional superconductors, which can dramatically reduce the size of a fusion reactor and may speed up the development of commercial fusion.

    We do have some materials designed to cope with the various challenges we throw at them in a fusion reactor. The front-runners at the moment are reduced activation steels, which have an altered composition to traditional steels so the levels of activation from neutron damage is reduced, and tungsten.

    One of the coolest things in science is something initially seen as a potential issue can turn into something positive. Fusion is no exception to this, and one very niche but noteworthy example is the case of tungsten fuzz. Fuzz is a nanostructure that forms on tungsten when exposed to helium plasma during fusion experiments. Initially considered a potential issue due to fears of erosion, there’s now research into non fusion applications, including solar water splitting – breaking it down into hydrogen and oxygen.

    However, no material is perfect, and there are several remaining issues. These include the manufacture of reduced activation materials at a large scale and the intrinsic brittleness of tungsten, which makes it a challenge to work with. We need to improve and refine on the existing materials we have.

    The Challenges

    Despite the huge advances in the field of materials for fusion, there’s still a lot of work that needs to be done. The main issue is we rely on several proxy experiments to recreate potential reactor conditions, and have to try and stitch this data together, often using very small samples. Detailed modeling work helps to extrapolate predictions of material performance. It would be much better if we could test our materials in real situations.

    The pandemic has had a major impact on materials research because it’s been more difficult to carry out real life experiments. It’s really important that we continue to develop and use advanced models to predict material performance. This can be combined with advances in machine learning, to identify the key experiments we need to focus on and identify the best materials for the job in future reactors.

    The manufacturing of new materials has typically been in small batches, focusing only on producing enough materials for experiments. Going forward, more companies will continue to work on fusion and there will be more programs working on experimental reactors or prototypes.

    Because of this, we are getting to the stage where we need to think more about industrialization and development of supply chains. As we edge closer to prototype reactors and hopefully power plants in the future, developing robust large-scale supply chains will be a huge challenge.

    Written by Aneeqa Khan, Research Fellow in Fusion, University of Manchester.

    Adapted from an article originally published on The Conversation.The Conversation

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Energy Fusion Energy Fusion Reactor Popular University of Manchester
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    MIT’s Fusion Breakthrough: Unlocking Star Power With Superconducting Magnets

    Major Breakthrough Puts Dream of Unlimited, Clean Nuclear Fusion Energy Within Reach

    Scientists Shatter Record for the Amount of Energy Produced During a Controlled, Sustained Fusion Reaction

    Compact Fusion Power Plant Concept Uses State-of-the-Art Physics To Improve Energy Production

    Harnessing the Power of the Sun on Earth: Major Advance in Stellarator Performance for Fusion Energy

    MIT Superconducting Magnet Breaks Records – Major Advance Toward Fusion Energy

    Korean Artificial Sun – KSTAR Fusion Reactor – Sets New World Record

    Cutting-Edge W7-X Nuclear Fusion Device Overcomes Obstacles

    A Big Step Forward for Nuclear Fusion Power

    25 Comments

    1. xABBAAA on April 18, 2021 6:45 am

      … don’t think materials of any kind will ever contain it, it might be possible through a field of some kind, but aren’t there a better ways to create power…

      Reply
      • xABBAAA on April 18, 2021 10:43 am

        … ionosphere, earth core, even gravity waves, annihilating virtual particles, to name just a few…

        Reply
    2. xABBAAA on April 18, 2021 10:39 am

      … what happened to my comment…

      Reply
    3. Forrest K on April 19, 2021 12:56 pm

      I don’t understand why we don’t explore how this works in space 1st where we know it works. We keep on trying to confine this thing in a bottle. In space we would have to work about confinement, just sustaining the reaction. Then we can learn how to put it in a bottle.

      Reply
    4. Josh on April 19, 2021 3:07 pm

      Tungsten could probably withstand the heat possibly

      Reply
    5. Sannan Abdullah on April 19, 2021 3:35 pm

      We should do these kind of experiments in deep space rather than on earth.

      Reply
    6. Still learning on April 19, 2021 6:28 pm

      What about using Aerogel for the walls to contain the heat

      Reply
    7. JR on April 19, 2021 6:45 pm

      It is in a field, a magnetic field.

      Reply
    8. PETRVS SECVNDVS on April 19, 2021 11:08 pm

      honesty, ferrofluid, and natural magnetism with conventional electrical generation techniques would have served much finer

      Reply
    9. Ryan A Lebeck on April 20, 2021 5:31 am

      I have been developing a Micro-Tokamak for the purposes of creating fusion fuels and I believe that I can promote a fusion reaction and cryogenic temperatures in a stable, reliable manner.

      I need more knowledge on the materials science of extremely low temperature applications.

      With the proper equipment I believe I can create a fusion reactor in less than 4 months. How would I go about gaining support for this project?

      Reply
      • C on April 20, 2021 10:16 am

        Use sound waves… Brownian motion paradox…

        Reply
        • xABBAAA on April 22, 2021 12:35 am

          … human way of thinking doesn’t support that idea, …

          Reply
    10. PulumN on April 21, 2021 12:32 am

      If by any chance,after the initial forced fusion in that conducive environment doughnut, the hydrogen atoms start an auto mode reaction. Then we may witness this beautiful earth turning into mini Sun.A hell on earth.And we all will become fuel 😂

      Reply
    11. George on April 21, 2021 2:47 am

      They should stop these projects to build reactors of this size. There’s enough power coming from the sun.

      Reply
    12. JenniWest on April 21, 2021 2:07 pm

      The problem with fusion is that it’s a pipedream. It ignores that we really don’t need anything but fission.

      Reply
      • Russ Hamilton on September 14, 2021 4:29 pm

        Fusion is futile…

        Reply
    13. Arunoday Singh on April 22, 2021 9:47 pm

      Why don’t you try some quantum objects as the walls of the reactor, this would eventually reduce the size of reactor exponentially,
      And since the neutrons are also quantum objects so they might fuse much faster and release much greater amounts of energy….

      Reply
    14. Scott on April 23, 2021 10:06 am

      What about the environment the sun is currently set in? Im sure the temperature in space as well as the vacuum play a part in with the natural fusion. Gravity must also play a part because otherwise the stars would fly apart. You may have to create a microscopic nano black hole at the center of the reaction as a gravity well. Those get created in the hadron collider all the time, but disappear almost immediately.

      Reply
    15. Scott on April 23, 2021 10:07 am

      What about the environment the sun is currently set in? Im sure the temperature in space as well as the vacuum play a part in with the natural fusion. Gravity must also play a part because otherwise the stars would fly apart. You may have to create a microscopic nano black hole at the center of the reaction as a gravity well. Those get created in the hadron collider all the time, but disappear almost immediately.

      Reply
    16. Echoesz on April 23, 2021 8:31 pm

      Sorry, has anyone tried creating a control sphere much like control rods in a fission reactor to absorb the excess nuetrons from the fusion reaction. Not sure if it would ruin the magnetic field

      Reply
    17. Unknown on April 24, 2021 11:26 am

      Sun is enough source of energy, why create an object that can possibly endanger every living things here on earth. Keep your curiosity to yourself and don’t put others lives at risk because of your selfish ambition.

      Reply
    18. DjSparta.Ke on April 26, 2021 12:45 am

      Knowledge will be the downfall of mankind

      Reply
    19. Bryce on May 2, 2021 9:11 am

      I see lots of good questions on here but a lot of you don’t quite understand. We have only 2 solid options when it comes to powering earth with less emissions. 1 is nuclear, most people hate nuclear because of the past and carelessness but it is the smartest source of power we can use. Modern nuclear reactors. The 2nd is a fusion reactor which at this point only works on paper amd has a million hurdles before we get there. What about solar, and wind power?! Well they pale in comparison to how much power we actually need. With current solar and wind tech it would be impossible for us to replace our power with these options. Throw that idea out or innovate it further first.

      Reply
      • Russ on September 14, 2021 4:27 pm

        Fusion is not an option, not now, not in 10 years, probably never.

        Reply
    20. Russell K Hamilton on September 14, 2021 4:25 pm

      Its not a matter of materials. Fusion without the quantum tunneling part is not going to work on earth except in H bombs. NIFs latest experiment used 400MJ of electricity and yielded 1.3 MJ in heat. If you normalize to make the electrical equivalent to the yielded thermal MJ it would be 1200MJ. So we on our best experiment ever are not even 1 percent of the way there.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Scientists May Have Found the Key to Jupiter and Saturn’s Moon Mystery

    Scientists Uncover Brain Changes That Link Pain to Depression

    Saunas May Do More Than Raise Body Temperature – They Activate Your Immune System

    Exercise in a Pill? Metformin Shows Surprising Effects in Cancer Patients

    Hidden Oceans of Magma Could Be Protecting Alien Life

    New Study Challenges Alzheimer’s Theories: It’s Not Just About Plaques

    Artificial Sweeteners May Harm Future Generations, Study Suggests

    Splashdown! NASA Artemis II Returns From Record-Breaking Moon Mission

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Scientists Discover Unexpected Climate Benefit Hidden in Forest Soils
    • The Grand Canyon’s “Swiss Cheese” Rocks Hold a Critical Secret
    • Scientists Discover 430,000-Year-Old Wooden Tools, Rewriting Human History
    • Scientists Make Breakthrough on 40-Year-Old 2D Physics Puzzle
    • As Cities Invade the Amazon, Yellow Fever Makes a Dangerous Comeback
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.