A new study conducted by the University of Liverpool has brought to light challenges associated with reforestation and restoration initiatives throughout Africa.
New research led by the University of Liverpool has unveiled the extent of unsuitable reforestation initiatives throughout Africa.
A study published in the journal Science reveals that an area the size of France is under threat by forest restoration initiatives due to inappropriate restoration in the form of tree planting.
Researchers analyzed the areas of land committed to restoration via reforestation and found that many programs include areas classified as non-forest systems. They believe that the inclusion of non-forest systems such as savannas and grasslands, which are threatened by increased tree cover, is the key issue.
They warn that planting trees in these grassy areas, which are structurally, functionally, and compositionally distinct from forests, could be a risk to wildlife such as rhinos and wildebeest, as well as people who depend on these ecosystems.
Urgent Need for Correct Restoration Approaches
Kate Parr, Professor of Tropical Ecology at the University’s School of Environmental Sciences and author of the study, said: “Restoration of ecosystems is needed and important, but it must be done in a way that is appropriate to each system. Non-forest systems such as savannas are misclassified as forests and therefore considered in need of restoration with trees. There is an urgent need to revise definitions so that savannas are not confused with forests because increasing trees is a threat to the integrity and persistence of savannas and grasslands.”
She continues, “Highlighting this issue now means there is still time to negate this threat and ensure that non-forest systems receive appropriate restoration.”
Global Implications of Reforestation Efforts
Dr Nicola Stevens, Trapnell Research Fellow in African Environments at the University of Oxford and co-author of the paper said: “The urgency of implementing large-scale tree planting is prompting funding of inadequately assessed projects that will most likely have negligible sequestration benefits and cause potential social and ecological harm.”
The study highlights that the issues raised are not unique to Africa and many other non-forest areas, for example, the open savannas and grasslands of India and Brazil, could face a similar future due to inappropriate ‘restoration’ with trees.
Reference: “Conflation of reforestation with restoration is widespread” by Catherine L. Parr, Mariska te Beest and Nicola Stevens, 15 February 2024, Science.
DOI: 10.1126/science.adj0899
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
2 Comments
You mean aforestation not reforestation.
Having worked in the restoration of fully degraded forests, on reserve, through commercial plantations within Africa, I can’t help thinking this was an opportunity missed. No examples are given, no location and no project specifics. This is indeed a problem that the public have little, if any, awareness of. There needs to be information available to the public that this is where their Tax money is going, where their Aid money is going, but it risks doing more harm than good. Nature needs a helping hand but attempting to re-write the African ecosystem is dangerous. Although intentions may well be good, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.