Physicists have shown that simulating models of hypothetical time travel can solve experimental problems that appear impossible to solve using standard physics.
If gamblers, investors, and quantum experimentalists could bend the arrow of time, their advantage would be significantly higher, leading to significantly better outcomes.
“We are not proposing a time travel machine, but rather a deep dive into the fundamentals of quantum mechanics.” David Arvidsson-Shukur
Researchers at the University of Cambridge have shown that by manipulating entanglement – a feature of quantum theory that causes particles to be intrinsically linked – they can simulate what could happen if one could travel backward in time. So that gamblers, investors and quantum experimentalists could, in some cases, retroactively change their past actions and improve their outcomes in the present.
Simulation and Time Loops
Whether particles can travel backward in time is a controversial topic among physicists, even though scientists have previously simulated models of how such spacetime loops could behave if they did exist. By connecting their new theory to quantum metrology, which uses quantum theory to make highly sensitive measurements, the Cambridge team has shown that entanglement can solve problems that otherwise seem impossible. The study was published on October 12 in the journal Physical Review Letters.
“Imagine that you want to send a gift to someone: you need to send it on day one to make sure it arrives on day three,” said lead author David Arvidsson-Shukur, from the Hitachi Cambridge Laboratory. “However, you only receive that person’s wish list on day two. So, in this chronology-respecting scenario, it’s impossible for you to know in advance what they will want as a gift and to make sure you send the right one.
“Now imagine you can change what you send on day one with the information from the wish list received on day two. Our simulation uses quantum entanglement manipulation to show how you could retroactively change your previous actions to ensure the final outcome is the one you want.”
Understanding Quantum Entanglement
The simulation is based on quantum entanglement, which consists of strong correlations that quantum particles can share and classical particles—those governed by everyday physics—cannot.
The particularity of quantum physics is that if two particles are close enough to each other to interact, they can stay connected even when separated. This is the basis of quantum computing – the harnessing of connected particles to perform computations too complex for classical computers.
“In our proposal, an experimentalist entangles two particles,” said co-author Nicole Yunger Halpern, researcher at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the University of Maryland. “The first particle is then sent to be used in an experiment. Upon gaining new information, the experimentalist manipulates the second particle to effectively alter the first particle’s past state, changing the outcome of the experiment.”
“The effect is remarkable, but it happens only one time out of four!” said Arvidsson-Shukur. “In other words, the simulation has a 75% chance of failure. But the good news is that you know if you have failed. If we stay with our gift analogy, one out of four times, the gift will be the desired one (for example a pair of trousers), another time it will be a pair of trousers but in the wrong size, or the wrong color, or it will be a jacket.”
Practical Applications and Limitations
To give their model relevance to technologies, the theorists connected it to quantum metrology. In a common quantum metrology experiment, photons—small particles of light—are shone onto a sample of interest and then registered with a special type of camera. If this experiment is to be efficient, the photons must be prepared in a certain way before they reach the sample. The researchers have shown that even if they learn how to best prepare the photons only after the photons have reached the sample, they can use simulations of time travel to retroactively change the original photons.
To counteract the high chance of failure, the theorists propose to send a huge number of entangled photons, knowing that some will eventually carry the correct, updated information. Then they would use a filter to ensure that the right photons pass to the camera, while the filter rejects the rest of the ‘bad’ photons.
“Consider our earlier analogy about gifts,” said co-author Aidan McConnell, who carried out this research during his master’s degree at the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge, and is now a PhD student at ETH, Zürich. “Let’s say sending gifts is inexpensive and we can send numerous parcels on day one. On day two we know which gift we should have sent. By the time the parcels arrive on day three, one out of every four gifts will be correct, and we select these by telling the recipient which deliveries to throw away.”
“That we need to use a filter to make our experiment work is actually pretty reassuring,” said Arvidsson-Shukur. “The world would be very strange if our time-travel simulation worked every time. Relativity and all the theories that we are building our understanding of our universe on would be out of the window.
“We are not proposing a time travel machine, but rather a deep dive into the fundamentals of quantum mechanics. These simulations do not allow you to go back and alter your past, but they do allow you to create a better tomorrow by fixing yesterday’s problems today.”
Reference: “Nonclassical Advantage in Metrology Established via Quantum Simulations of Hypothetical Closed Timelike Curves” by David R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur, Aidan G. McConnell and Nicole Yunger Halpern, 12 October 2023, Physical Review Letters.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.150202
This work was supported by the Sweden-America Foundation, the Lars Hierta Memorial Foundation, Girton College, and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI).
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
5 Comments
So how do we fast track a path to getting the correct answer 4 out of 4 times so that we aren’t at a 25% correct answer ? That’s my question
not provable, I won’t get in to explaining other than given a persons preferences and a multiple amount of life scenarios of such person and prier choices made a list can be formulated with high to low preferences. There are something that simply cannot be changed that’s history and time is fleeting we make it what it is.
Weren’t we just here about a week ago with a similar scenario and that article mysteriously disappeared into some sort of blackhole shortly after it was published? Since the very basis of the worthiness of capitalism is to gain at the expense of others, I can definitely see its value. Of course the experiment could be run in the future with no problem whatsoever and if the answer should be wrong, it could be run again until the correct answer is achieved, then wait, for time to catch up to the tested event, that way if it were to turn out that time is by nature non-euclidean, even a filter would still produce unacceptable errors, such as what occurs in the high energy fields needed for particle accelerators where virtual particles interfer with the desired observation. Something like that, if we think of time in the same manner as we do space, because other research has already revealed that reality.
Surely this is the equivalent of trying to use entanglement to send information faster than light which is forbidden. The proposed filter must fail.
The gifts analogy is flawed. If I send four gifts one day one, on day two I find out the correct one, and day three I tell him to filter out the three incorrect gifts this is not time travel, simulated or otherwise