Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Earth»Shuttering Fossil Fuel Power Plants by 2035 May Cost Less Than Expected
    Earth

    Shuttering Fossil Fuel Power Plants by 2035 May Cost Less Than Expected

    By Georgia Institute of TechnologyDecember 7, 2020No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Coal-Fired Power Plant
    The Gibson Generating Station is a coal-burning power plant located in Gibson County, Indiana. Credit: Emily Grubert, Georgia Tech

    Decarbonizing U.S. electricity production will require both construction of renewable energy sources and retirement of power plants now operated by fossil fuels. A generator-level model described in the December 4, 2020, issue of the journal Science suggests that most fossil fuel power plants could complete normal lifespans and still close by 2035 because so many facilities are nearing the end of their operational lives.

    Meeting a 2035 deadline for decarbonizing U.S. electricity production, as proposed by the incoming U.S. presidential administration, would eliminate just 15% of the capacity-years left in plants powered by fossil fuels, says the article by Emily Grubert, a Georgia Institute of Technology researcher. Plant retirements are already underway, with 126 gigawatts of fossil generator capacity taken out of production between 2009 and 2018, including 33 gigawatts in 2017 and 2018 alone.

    “Creating an electricity system that does not contribute to climate change is actually two processes — building carbon-free infrastructure like solar plants, and closing carbon-based infrastructure like coal plants,” said Grubert, an assistant professor in Georgia Tech’s School of Civil and Environmental Engineering. “My work shows that because a lot of U.S. fossil fuel plants are already pretty old, the target of decarbonization by 2035 would not require us to shut most of these plants down earlier than their typical lifespans.”

    Lifespan of Electricity-Generating Facilities
    This map shows the locations of electricity-generating facilities with projected lifespans that extend beyond 2035. Credit: Emily Grubert, Georgia Tech

    Of U.S. fossil fuel-fired generation capacity, 73% (630 out of 840 gigawatts) will reach the end of its typical lifespan by 2035; that percentage would reach 96% by 2050, she says in the Policy Forum article. About 13% of U.S. fossil fuel-fired generation capacity (110 GW) operating in 2018 had already exceeded its typical lifespan.

    Because typical lifespans are averages, some generators operate for longer than expected. Allowing facilities to run until they retire is thus likely insufficient for a 2035 decarbonization deadline, the article notes. Closure deadlines that strand assets relative to reasonable lifespan expectations, however, could create financial liability for debts and other costs. The research found that a 2035 deadline for completely retiring fossil-based electricity generators would only strand about 15% (1700 gigawatt-years) of fossil fuel-fired capacity life, along with about 20% (380,000 job-years) of direct power plant and fuel extraction jobs that existed in 2018.

    In 2018, fossil fuel facilities operated in 1,248 of 3,141 counties, directly employing about 157,000 people at generators and fuel-extraction facilities. Plant closure deadlines can improve outcomes for workers and host communities by providing additional certainty, for example, by enabling specific advance planning for things like remediation, retraining for displaced workers, and revenue replacements.

    “Closing large industrial facilities like power plants can be really disruptive for the people that work there and live in the surrounding communities,” Grubert said. “We don’t want to repeat the damage we saw with the collapse of the steel industry in the 70s and 80s, where people lost jobs, pensions, and stability without warning. We already know where the plants are, and who might be affected: using the 2035 decarbonization deadline to guide explicit, community-grounded planning for what to do next can help, even without a lot of financial support.”

    Planning ahead will also help avoid creating new capital investments that may not be needed long-term. “We shouldn’t build new fossil fuel power plants that would still be young in 2035, and we need to have explicit plans for closures both to ensure the system keeps working and to limit disruption for host communities,” she said.

    Underlying policies governing the retirement of fossil fuel-powered facilities is the concept of a “just transition” that ensures material well-being and distributional justice for individuals and communities affected by a transition from fossil to non-fossil electricity systems. Determining which assets are “stranded,” or required to close earlier than expected absent policy, is vital for managing compensation for remaining debt and/or lost revenue, Grubert said in the article.

    Reference: “Fossil electricity retirement deadlines for a just transition” by Emily Grubert, 4 December 2020, Science.
    DOI: 10.1126/science.abe0375

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Atmospheric Science Climate Change Energy Georgia Institute of Technology Pollution
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Methane Emissions From Oil and Natural Gas Production Higher Than Previously Thought

    Increasingly Mobile Sea Ice Risks Polluting Arctic Neighbors With Oil and Microplastics

    Reports of Huge Reductions in This Potent Greenhouse Gas Are Wrong – Emissions Are Soaring

    Shutdown of Coal-Fired Power Plants in U.S. Saved Thousands of Lives

    New and Strange Climate Pattern Includes More Violent El Nino Swings

    150 Top International Scientists Warn of Devastating Impact of Nitrogen Pollution

    Aerosols Have a Major Impact on Our Climate, but Greenhouse Gases Get Most Attention

    “Encouraging News” – China Is on Track to Meet Its Ultra-Low Emissions Goals for 2020

    The First ‘Bottom-Up’ Estimates of China’s CO2 Emissions

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    The Universe Is Expanding Too Fast and Scientists Can’t Explain Why

    “Like Liquid Metal”: Scientists Create Strange Shape-Shifting Material

    Early Warning Signals of Esophageal Cancer May Be Hiding in Plain Sight

    Common Blood Pressure Drug Shows Surprising Power Against Deadly Antibiotic-Resistant Superbug

    Scientists Uncover Dangerous Connection Between Serotonin and Heart Valve Disease

    Scientists Discover a “Protector” Protein That Could Help Reverse Hair Loss

    Bone-Strengthening Discovery Could Reverse Osteoporosis

    Scientists Uncover Hidden Trigger Behind Stem Cell Aging

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Drinking Alcohol To Cope in Your 20s Could Damage Your Brain for Life
    • Scientists Crack Alfalfa’s Chromosome Mystery After Decades of Debate
    • Ancient Ant-Plant Alliance Collapses As Predatory Wasps Move In
    • Scientists Discover Tiny New Spider That Hunts Prey 6x Its Size
    • Natural Component From Licorice Shows Promise for Treating Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.