
A recent study funded by the National Institutes of Health reveals that analyzing specific fats and C-reactive protein in the blood can accurately predict a woman’s cardiovascular disease risk decades in advance.
These findings, crucial for early detection and prevention, were highlighted at the European Society of Cardiology Congress and published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Breakthrough Research in Cardiovascular Disease Prediction
Research supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has found that measuring two types of fat in the bloodstream along with C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of inflammation, can predict a woman’s risk for cardiovascular disease decades later. These findings, presented as late-breaking research at the European Society of Cardiology Congress 2024, were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
“We can’t treat what we don’t measure, and we hope these findings move the field closer to identifying even earlier ways to detect and prevent heart disease,” said Paul M. Ridker, M.D., M.P.H., a study author and the director of the Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston.
For the study, investigators collected blood samples and medical information from 27,939 healthcare providers living in the United States who participated in the Women’s Health Study. Women, who started the study between 1992-1995 at an average age of 55, were followed for 30 years. During this period, 3,662 study participants experienced a heart attack, stroke, surgery to restore circulation, or a cardiovascular-related death. Researchers assessed how high-sensitivity CRP, along with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), a lipid partly made of LDL, singularly and collectively predicted these events.
Participants were grouped into five categories — ranging from those with the highest to lowest levels — to measure each of the three markers. Researchers found that women with the highest levels of LDL cholesterol had a 36% increased associated risk for heart disease compared to those with the lowest levels. Those with the highest levels of Lp(a) had a 33% increased associated risk, and those with the highest levels of CRP had a 70% increased associated risk.
When all three measures — LDL cholesterol, Lp(a), and CRP — were assessed together, participants with the highest levels had more than a 1.5-times increased associated risk for stroke and more than a 3-times increased associated risk for coronary heart disease compared to women with the lowest levels.
Gender Comparison and Inflammation Insights
The researchers note that while only women were assessed in this study, they would expect to find similar results in men.
“In recent years, we’ve learned more about how increased levels of inflammation can interact with lipids to compound cardiovascular disease risks,” said Ahmed A.K. Hasan, M.D., Ph.D., a medical officer and program director at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). “This helps explain why lower levels are often better.”
Immune cells, which help the body repair itself from wounds or infection, can also sense the accumulation of extra cholesterol in cells or become activated in response to the build-up of plaque and send out inflammatory signals. This creates a hyperinflammatory environment where plaque can form, become larger, or even rupture — and cause cardiovascular events.
Promoting Cardiovascular Health and Prevention Strategies
To support optimal cardiovascular health, the researchers emphasize primary prevention. This includes getting regular physical activity, eating a heart-healthful diet, managing stress, and avoiding tobacco or quitting smoking. Other measures for people with increased risks may include using medication to lower cholesterol and/or reduce inflammation. Researchers have also found that steps people take earlier in life to support their heart and vascular health can add up over time and correlate with better health outcomes years and even decades later.
LDL cholesterol, which is routinely measured by healthcare providers, can be treated with widely-available therapies, such as statins. However, standard Lp(a) and CRP screening recommendations can vary.
Variability in Screening and Treatment Options
Some countries recommend screening for Lp(a) since elevated levels are often due to inherited risks. In areas without universal Lp(a) screenings, like the U.S., physicians can order tests for people with heart disease or who have a family history of it. Some therapies are available for those with elevated levels and researchers are testing new approaches to personalize and improve treatment options.
Testing for CRP also varies. Screening often depends on a person’s underlying risks or is up to the discretion of the provider. Colchicine, an anti-inflammatory therapy previously used for gout, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2023 to offset risks for cardiovascular disease among people with atherosclerosis. Additional anti-inflammatory therapies and approaches are being studied.
Reference: “Inflammation, Cholesterol, Lipoprotein(a), and 30-Year Cardiovascular Outcomes in Women” by Paul M. Ridker, M. Vinayaga Moorthy, Nancy R. Cook, Nader Rifai, I-Min Lee and Julie E. Buring, 30 August 2024, New England Journal of Medicine.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2405182
This research was supported by grants from NHLBI (HL043851, HL080467, and HL099355) and the National Cancer Institute (CA047988, CA182913)
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
4 Comments
This study is correlational, not a proof of causation between these factors and disease outcomes. It also does not explain why these women have elevated cholesterol, etc. The cause of these elevated levels may be the problem.
Keep in mind that the medical industry profits by treating disease, and the earlier they can treat it the better for the industry, not necessarily for the patient. Studies which try to identify a disease 30 years in advance are a marketing ploy. If you can live 30 years with certain levels of blood markers before disease occurs, then it can’t be that bad. They also ignore the impact of treatment side effects. Taking drugs is not a good thing to do unless you have no choice. “Preventative treatment” is an oxymoron, and the risks of treatment may easily outweigh the benefits, especially when the risks are real and immediate from taking the drug, and the benefits are theoretical and unreal and 30 years in the future. Remember that drug side effects are one of the biggest causes of death, and after 30 years the drug that would have been taken may have been shown either ineffective, or the cause of bad side effects, and may even be taken off the market. It happens all the time. Drugs can change more in 30 years than people do.
So instead of looking for what drug to take now to prevent a potential disease 30 years from now, just live your life as healthfully as you can with a good lifestyle. It won’t make the drug companies any money, but it could help you live longer and healthier.
Exactly. Drug companies are really just pushers hiding behind science.
“If you can live 30 years with certain levels of blood markers before disease occurs, then it can’t be that bad”
lol.. yep..silly stuff indeed.
You can find a ton of similar blood studies accomplished in the past few decades, 99% funded by corporations. All garbage studies to sell fake blood tests.
Like this ad from the Evil Abbott: https://www.abbott.com/corpnewsroom/products-and-innovation/finally-a-blood-test-for-traumatic-brain-injury.html
Recently released an abstract reporting the s100b blood test for mTBI is of limited clinical value in elderly patients: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0020138324000044
This blood test only ‘sorta’ works if you are really old and more prone to stroke but developed mostly for the hypochondriacs on their 10th booster.
It would be convenient if one could send the tampon soaked with menstrual blood to analysis, to avoid getting poked with needles.