Stanford Scientists Discover Crucial Missing Component of Sea-Level Rise

Ice Calving Massive Glacier

Researchers have identified an additional process that could have a significant effect on an ice sheet’s future: thawing of the bed, where the ice sheet touches land.

Scientists seeking to understand how melting ice in Antarctica will impact the planet’s oceans often use computational modeling. Their recent efforts have focused on ice-sheet geometry, fracture, and surface melting – processes that could potentially trigger or accelerate ice-sheet mass loss. Now, an additional process that could have a similarly significant effect on the ice sheet’s future has been identified by researchers: thawing of the bed, known as basal thaw, at the interface of the land and the miles-thick ice sheet above it.

The new study identifies areas that are not currently losing large amounts of mass but could be poised to match some of the largest contributors to sea-level rise – such as Thwaites Glacier – if they thawed. With an area of 14,200,000 km2 (5,500,000 sq mi) Antarctica is roughly 45% larger than the size of the United States. The susceptible regions comprise an area greater than California. The research will be published today (September 14, 2022) in the journal Nature Communications.

“You can’t necessarily assume that everywhere that’s currently frozen will stay frozen,” said senior study author Dustin Schroeder. He is an associate professor of geophysics at the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability. “These regions may be under-appreciated potential contributors.”

Unusual suspects

Recent theoretical work demonstrating that basal thaw might happen over short time periods served as the foundation for the simulations. Using numerical ice sheet models, the co-authors of the study tested hypotheses about whether the onset of such thawing could lead to significant ice loss within a 100-year period. They discovered that triggering thaw led to mass loss in regions of the ice sheet that are not usually associated with instability and sea-level contributions at that time scale.

“There really has been little to no continental-wide work that looks at the onset of thawing – that transition from frozen ice to ice at the melting point, where a little bit of water at the bed can cause the ice to slide,” said lead study author Eliza Dawson, a PhD student in geophysics. “We were interested in learning how big an effect thawing could have and what regions of the ice sheet were potentially most susceptible.”

The scientists modeled temperature changes at Antarctica’s base according to shifts in friction caused by the ice sheet sliding over the land beneath it. The simulations revealed that in East Antarctica, which is currently considered a relatively stable region compared to West Antarctica, the Enderby-Kemp and George V Land areas would be most sensitive to thawing at their beds. Within George V Land, they also highlighted the Wilkes Basin as capable of becoming a leading sea-level contributor if thawing were to occur – a feature comparable in size to the rapidly evolving and likely unstable Thwaites Glacier in West Antarctica.

“The whole community is really focusing on Thwaites right now,” said Schroeder, who is also an associate professor of electrical engineering. “But some of the regions that are the usual suspects for big, impactful changes aren’t the most provocative and impactful areas in this study.”

Temperature matters

Because of Antarctica’s location and extreme conditions, information about the ice sheet is limited. Even less is known about the land beneath its frozen façade.

“Measuring the bed is a massive effort in these remote places – we have the technology to do it, but you really need to pick the spot, and sometimes it takes years, and field camps, and special equipment to go do that,” Schroeder said. “It’s difficult and expensive.”

To fill in information gaps, the scientists relied on the physics of how ice slides – how changes in temperature affect the way the ice sheet flows and evolves. In follow-on work, the authors plan to develop and apply radar-based analysis approaches to study the temperature of the ice sheet bed in these critical areas.

“You need to know the regions where it matters, and that’s the transformative contribution of Eliza’s paper,” Schroeder said. “It asks these broad questions: Does this matter? And if it matters, where? We hope this approach gives the community some priorities into where to look and why, and to avoid going down blind alleys.”

Sleeping giants?

Scientists do not currently know what forces are most capable of triggering thawing at the bed in the potentially susceptible regions identified in this study – or how soon they may be able to do so. One possible driver could be changing ocean conditions, which is the case elsewhere in Antarctica.

“Warm ocean water does not necessarily reach these East Antarctica regions as it does in parts of West Antarctica, but it’s nearby, so there’s potential that could change,” Schroeder said. “When you consider the recent theoretical work showing that thermal processes at the bed can be easy to activate – even spontaneous – it makes near-term thawing of the ice-sheet bed seem like a far easier switch to flip than we’d thought.”

The study demonstrates that measuring, understanding, and modeling the temperature at the base of ice sheets is important for understanding our future, as the biggest uncertainty in sea-level rise projections is the contribution from processes that can shift the behavior of massive ice sheets like Greenland and Antarctica.

“Follow-on work will be needed to take a closer look at these regions that this paper identified,” Dawson said. “Showing that thawing at the bed can result in mass loss from the ice sheet is a process that the community needs to understand and really start looking at – especially in these potentially vulnerable areas.”

Reference: “Ice mass loss sensitivity to the Antarctic ice sheet basal thermal state” by Eliza J. Dawson, Dustin M. Schroeder, Winnie Chu, Elisa Mantelli and Hélène Seroussi, 14 September 2022, Nature Communications.
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32632-2

Schroeder is also a faculty affiliate with the Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) and a center fellow, by courtesy, at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment. Co-authors of the paper are from Georgia Institute of Technology, the University of Tasmania, and Dartmouth College.

This research was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, National Science Foundation Award No. 1745137, and the NASA Cryospheric Science Program.

4 Comments on "Stanford Scientists Discover Crucial Missing Component of Sea-Level Rise"

  1. … You better tell billary & obummer to sell their beachfront property!?!
    Oh wait, this is only meant for the commoners to get us to “submit”…

  2. “These regions MAY be under-appreciated potential contributors.”

    The operative word here is “may.”

    “Using numerical ice sheet models, the co-authors … tested hypotheses about whether the onset of such thawing could lead to significant ice loss within a 100-year period.”

    What apparently isn’t appreciated by the co-authors, is that these “ice sheet models” are themselves hypotheses — complex hypotheses formally stated in computer code — that contain numerous unstated assumptions and approximations. What they are basically saying is that they are testing hypotheses with hypotheses. The models need to be verified for the range of variables expected to be encountered in their various hypotheses for future scenarios.

    “Now, an additional process … has been identified by researchers: thawing of the bed, …, at the interface of the land and the miles-thick ice sheet above it.”

    That may or may not be applicable because if the bedrock topography has considerable relief, as can be observed in the area east of Thule Air Base (Greenland), then ice movement may be dominated by shearing over the outcrops and ridges, as observed in the ice tunnel at Camp Tuto, and be little affected by basal thawing. They implicitly acknowledge this issue when they say, “Even less is known about the land beneath its frozen façade.”

    These modelers need to get out of their air-conditioned offices and collect field data before announcing what their models tell them about the future.

  3. So,you are punching ransom,best guess numbers into a computer modle? For over fifty years…A HALF A CENTURY, the enviromentalest/ liberal, Eco-warriors have been telling this lie to the sheeple,IF WE DONT DON’T DO SOMETHING RIGHT NOW,WE WILL ALL BE DEAD IN TEN YEARS!!! We are still here and very much alive!

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.