Discover a new, eco-friendly method of synthesizing ammonia using Earth’s natural geological processes, potentially transforming fertilizer production and reducing the chemical industry’s carbon footprint.
Instead of using energy-intensive reactors to produce ammonia, scientists are exploring a more natural approach by tapping into Earth’s underground heat and pressure. A recent proof-of-concept study, published on January 21 in the journal Joule, demonstrated that ammonia can be generated by combining nitrogen-infused water with iron-rich rocks — without requiring any external energy or releasing CO2. This innovative method could offer a more sustainable alternative to traditional ammonia production, with the potential to supply enough ammonia for an estimated 2.42 million years.
The inspiration for this approach comes from an unusual geological discovery made in the 1980s in Mali, West Africa. Locals found a well emitting hydrogen gas, which scientists later determined was the result of a natural chemical reaction between water and rock deep beneath the Earth’s surface.
Harnessing Earth’s Factory
“It was an ‘aha’ moment,” says senior author Iwnetim Abate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). “We may be able to use Earth as a factory, harnessing its heat and pressure to produce valuable chemicals like ammonia in a cleaner manner.”
Ammonia is as a key ingredient in fertilizers and could one day power the future as clean fuel, but today’s industrial ammonia production is energy intensive. It consumes about 2% of global energy and releases around 2.4 tons (5,291 lb) of CO2 for every ton (2,204 lb) of ammonia produced, making it the chemical industry’s top CO2 emitter.
Testing and Optimizing Natural Processes
To test their “Earth factory” idea, Abate and his team built a rock-water reaction system that mimics Earth’s subsurface environment. They exposed synthetic iron-rich minerals to nitrogen-laced water, triggering a chemical reaction that oxidized the rock and yielded ammonia, which the team dubbed “geological ammonia.” The process required no energy input, emitted no CO2, and even worked under ambient conditions.
The team then swapped the synthetic mineral with olivine, a natural iron-laden rock, to better mimic real-world scenarios. They further optimized the process by adding a copper catalyst and cranking the heat to 300°C (572°F). Within 21 hours, they produced about 1.8 kg (4 lb) of ammonia per ton (2,204.6 lb) of olivine, demonstrating the method’s feasibility and sustainability.
Economic Viability and Environmental Impact
“These rocks are all over the world, so the method could be adapted very widely across the globe,” says Abate. But still, “there’s a whole other level of complexity that we’ll need to work through.” Implementation will involve drilling into iron-rich rocks deep within Earth, injecting nitrogen-laced water, and grappling with the intricacies of how rocks crack, expand, and interact with gases and liquids.
The idea’s economic outlook is encouraging. Producing geological ammonia costs about $0.55 per kilogram (2.2 lb), on par with conventional methods priced at $0.40–$0.80. The research may also open new ways to address wastewater pollution.
“Nitrogen sources are considered as pollution in wastewater, and removing them costs money and energy,” says first author Yifan Gao of MIT. “But we may be able use the wastewater to produce ammonia. It’s a win-win strategy.” Integrating wastewater treatment with ammonia production could yield an additional profit of $3.82 per kilogram of ammonia.
“Ammonia is pretty important for life,” says senior author Ju Li of MIT. Apart from microbes, the only other natural way to produce ammonia on Earth is through lightning striking nitrogen gas. “That’s why the geological production of ammonia is quite interesting when you think about where life came from.”
Reference: “Geological ammonia: Stimulated NH3 production from rocks” by Yifan Gao, Ming Lei, Bachu Sravan Kumar, Hugh Barrett Smith, Seok Hee Han, Lokesh Sangabattula, Ju Li and Iwnetim I. Abate, 21 January 2025, Joule.
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2024.12.006
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation.
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.