Researchers propose using “wood vaults” to store carbon by burying wood to prevent decomposition, potentially sequestering up to 10 gigatons of CO2 annually. Further study is needed to assess the method’s environmental impacts and scalability.
Inspired by the discovery of an ancient buried log, researchers have developed a new method to capture and store atmospheric carbon for centuries. The technique involves sealing woody biomass in “wood vaults,” offering a potentially cost-effective way to combat climate change.
Achieving net-zero carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is crucial for combating climate change, yet reducing fossil fuel emissions alone is insufficient to meet the Paris Agreement’s targets. To achieve these goals, carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods must be implemented, including engineering solutions, like direct air capture, and nature-based approaches, such as reforestation or afforestation. Forests play a crucial role in the climate change discourse as significant carbon sinks in natural carbon cycles, sequestering atmospheric carbon through photosynthesis.
Limitations of Natural Carbon Storage
However, the carbon stored in wood via this natural carbon cycle is often quickly returned to the atmosphere due to decomposition or burning of biomass, leaving little net impact on atmospheric carbon. It is unknown whether carbon-storing woody biomass can be preserved long enough (hundreds of years or longer) to have an appreciable effect on reducing anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere.
Here, Ning Zeng and colleagues explore the viability of a CDR strategy involving burying sustainably sourced wood in an engineered structure called a “wood vault” to prolong the duration of carbon storage by preventing decay and decomposition. This novel method was inspired by the discovery of a remarkably preserved 3775-year-old Eastern red cedar log buried in clay soil in Quebec, Canada – a find that demonstrates the potential for long-term carbon storage through wood burial within certain environments.
Research Findings and Carbon Storage Potential
By comparing the ancient log to a modern sample from the same species, Zeng et al. found that, despite being buried for nearly 4 millennia, the ancient wood had only lost up to 5% of its carbon, likely due to the low permeability and anoxic nature of the compact clay soil in which it was buried. Using carbon cycle modeling and forestry data, the authors estimate that up to 10 gigatons of CO2 could be sequestered via wood vaulting annually, using trees as well as underutilized wood residues, such as urban tree waste and forest byproducts from commercial thinning.
The authors also estimated an initial CDR cost of only $100 to $200 per ton. “A full life-cycle assessment is needed to quantify the net emissions and environmental impacts across ecosystems, supply chains, and engineered wood vaults, as well as to understand how these impacts vary by location and wood sources,” writes Yuan Yao in a related Perspective. “These understandings will be critical to developing biomass burial projects on a global scale.”
Reference: “3775-year-old wood burial supports “wood vaulting” as a durable carbon removal method” by Ning Zeng, Xinpeng Zhao, Ghislain Poisson, Bryson Clifford, Yu Liu, He Liu, Taotao Meng, Laura Picard, Elisa Zeng-Mariotti, Ben Zaitchik and Liangbing Hu, 26 September 2024, Science.
DOI: 10.1126/science.adm8133
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
3 Comments
Excellent that someone is proposing the bleedin’ obvious.
Much, much more use should be made of wood as a building material. Admittedly it would only be a one-off, but there’s scope globally to store a very large amount of carbon that way (and of course it’s just nicer stuff than concrete). Apparently it can be fairly easily fireproofed these days, too.
The best solution is to STHU and quit being chicken littles.
ARCTIC Summer Ice Hasn’t Declined in a Decade, Climate Scientists Covered It Up. The press and the global warming crowd deliberately suppress the fact that ANTARCTICA has had record cold, snow and ice accumulation for decades. Even the last few years, ANTARCTICA , snow and ice have hit record numbers.
The number of catastrophic hurricanes and tornadoes has dwindled the last couple of decades.
The so-called doomed Great Barrier Reef is thriving and growing.
The oceans have not risen appreciably other than the normal waxing and waning of ice melt and evaporation cycles
Has anyone done even a ‘back of envelope’ calculation of the amount of ground necessary to sequester a significant amount of wood, how much would be suitable (low permeability), and of the intersection of those two parameters, how much would not be in conflict with other demands such as agriculture or conservation reserves? Something else that needs to be looked at is the energy costs to excavate the burial sites, transport the wood fill, and re-fill the holes. Will there be a net gain from the activity, or will the sequestering release as much CO2 from the heavy equipment as will be sequestered?
“There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.” ― Mark Twain