Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Physics»Beyond the Visible Universe: New Research Reveals How Gravity Influences the Quantum Realm
    Physics

    Beyond the Visible Universe: New Research Reveals How Gravity Influences the Quantum Realm

    By Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityFebruary 8, 20245 Comments7 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Particle Physics Plasma Relativity
    Nuclear physicists have discovered gravity’s profound influence on the quantum scale, revealing the strong force’s distribution within protons for the first time. This groundbreaking research, combining historical theoretical insights with modern experimental data, offers unprecedented understanding of the proton’s internal dynamics and sets the stage for future discoveries in nuclear science.

    Nuclear physicists at Jefferson Lab have mapped the distribution of the strong force within the proton, employing a framework that links to gravity, opening a new pathway for exploration.

    Gravity’s influence is unmistakably evident throughout the observable universe. Its effects are observed in the synchronized orbits of moons around planets, in comets that deviate from their paths due to the gravitational pull of large stars, and in the majestic spirals of enormous galaxies. These magnificent phenomena highlight the role of gravity on the grandest scales of matter. Meanwhile, nuclear physicists are uncovering the significant contributions of gravity at the very smallest scales of matter.

    New research conducted by nuclear physicists at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility is using a method that connects theories of gravitation to interactions among the smallest particles of matter to reveal new details at this smaller scale. The research has now revealed, for the first time, a snapshot of the distribution of the strong force inside the proton. This snapshot details the shear stress the force may exert on the quark particles that make up the proton. The result was recently published in Reviews of Modern Physics.

    Insights into Proton Structure

    According to the lead author on the study, Jefferson Lab Principal Staff Scientist Volker Burkert, the measurement reveals insight into the environment experienced by the proton’s building blocks. Protons are built of three quarks that are bound together by the strong force.

    “At its peak, this is more than a four-ton force that one would have to apply to a quark to pull it out of the proton,” Burkert explained. “Nature, of course, does not allow us to separate just one quark from the proton because of a property of quarks called ‘color.’ There are three colors that mix quarks in the proton to make it appear colorless from the outside, a requirement for its existence in space. Trying to pull a colored quark out of the proton will produce a colorless quark/anti-quark pair, a meson, using the energy you put in to attempt to separate the quark, leaving a colorless proton (or neutron) behind. So, the 4-tons is an illustration of the strength of the force that is intrinsic in the proton.”

    The result is only the second of the proton’s mechanical properties to be measured. The proton’s mechanical properties include its internal pressure (measured in 2018), its mass distribution (physical size), its angular momentum, and its shear stress (shown here). The result was made possible by a half-century-old prediction and two-decade-old data.

    In the mid-1960s, it was theorized that if nuclear physicists could see how gravity interacts with subatomic particles, such as the proton, such experiments could reveal the proton’s mechanical properties directly.

    “But at that time, there was no way. If you compare gravity with the electromagnetic force, for instance, there is 39 orders of magnitude of difference – So it’s completely hopeless, right?” explained Latifa Elouadhriri, a Jefferson Lab staff scientist and co-author on the study.

    Theoretical Foundations and Experimental Breakthroughs

    The decades-old data came from experiments conducted with Jefferson Lab’s Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF), a DOE Office of Science user facility. A typical CEBAF experiment would entail an energetic electron interacting with another particle by exchanging a packet of energy and a unit of angular momentum called a virtual photon with the particle. The energy of the electron dictates which particles it interacts with in this way and how they respond.

    In the experiment, a force even much greater than the four tons needed to pull out a quark/antiquark pair was applied to the proton by the highly energetic electron beam interacting with the proton in a target of liquified hydrogen gas.

    “We developed the program to study deeply virtual Compton scattering. This is where you have an electron exchanging a virtual photon with the proton. And at the final state, the proton remained the same but recoiled, and you have one real very highly energetic photon produced, plus the scattered electron,” said Elouadhriri. “At the time we took the data, we were not aware that beyond the 3-dimensional imaging we intended with this data, we were also collecting the data needed for accessing the mechanical properties of the proton.”

    It turns out that this specific process – deeply virtual Compton scattering (DVCS) – could be connected to how gravity interacts with matter. The general version of this connection was stated in the 1973 textbook on Einstein’s general theory of relativity titled ‘Gravitation’ by Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne, and John Archibald Wheeler.

    In it, they wrote, “Any mass-less spin-2 field would give rise to a force indistinguishable from gravitation, because a mass-less spin-2 field would couple to the stress–energy tensor in the same way that gravitational interactions do.”

    Three decades later, theorist Maxim Polyakov followed up on this idea by establishing the theoretical foundation that connects the DVCS process and gravitational interaction.

    “This breakthrough in theory established the relationship between the measurement of deeply virtual Compton scattering to the gravitational form factor. And we were able to use that for the first time and extract the pressure that we did in the Nature paper in 2018, and now the normal force and the shear force,” Burkert explained.

    A more detailed description of the connections between the DVCS process and the gravitational interaction can be found in this article describing the first result obtained from this research.

    Future Directions and Theoretical Advancements

    The researchers say their next step is to work on extracting the information they need from the existing DVCS data to enable the first determination of the proton’s mechanical size. They also hope to take advantage of newer, higher-statistics, and higher-energy experiments that are continuing the DVCS research in the proton.

    In the meantime, the study co-authors have been amazed at the plethora of new theoretical efforts, detailed in hundreds of theoretical publications, that have begun to exploit this newly discovered avenue for exploring the mechanical properties of the proton.

    “And also, now that we are in this new era of discovery with the 2023 Long Range Plan of Nuclear Science released recently. This will be a major pillar of the direction of science with new facilities and new detector developments. We’re looking forward to seeing more of what can be done,” Burkert said.

    Elouadhriri agrees.

    “And in my view, this is just the beginning of something much bigger to come. It has already changed the way we think about the structure of the proton,” she said.

    “Now, we can express the structure of subnuclear particles in terms of forces, pressure, and physical sizes that also non-physicists can relate to,” added Burkert.

    Reference: “Colloquium: Gravitational form factors of the proton” by V. D. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri, F. X. Girod, C. Lorcé, P. Schweitzer and P. E. Shanahan, 22 December 2023, Reviews of Modern Physics.
    DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.041002

    The study was funded by the US Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Carl G. and Shirley Sontheimer Research Fund.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    DOE Gravity Particle Physics Popular Protons Thomas Jefferson National Laboratory
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Revolutionary Calculations Unveil the Hidden Motion of Quarks Inside Protons

    Inside the Neutron: Scientists Discover Hidden Layers of Matter

    The Quantum Twist: Unveiling the Proton’s Hidden Spin

    “Extremely Surprising” – Nuclear Physicists Have a Groundbreaking Observation of “Strange Matter”

    Inside the Enigmatic Proton: A Tale of Differing Mass and Size Measurements

    Physicists Baffled by Proton Structure Anomaly

    Electrons Set the Stage for Neutrino Experiments – Solving Mystery of the Origins of Our Matter-Dominated Universe

    New Era of Physics: First Direct Probes of the Strongest Force in the Universe

    Physicists Get Closer to Solving the Proton Radius Puzzle With Unique New Measurement

    5 Comments

    1. Bao-hua ZHANG on February 8, 2024 3:18 pm

      Please answer:
      1. Why is mathematics the language of science?
      2. What is the difference between low dimensional spacetime matter and high-dimensional spacetime matter in mathematics?
      3. What exactly is quantum?
      4. Is quantum necessarily high-dimensional spacetime matter?
      5. Is the so-called academic journal you believe in scientific? Are they honest?
      and so on.

      Science must follow mathematical rules. For example, the Standard Model (SM) is considered to be one of the most significant achievements of physics in the 20th century. However, the magnetic moment of μ particle is larger than expected, revealed by a g-2 experiment at Fermilab, suggests that the established theory (such as SM) of fundamental particles is incomplete. Furthermore, the SM omitting gravity, it not involved the time problem and when the particle movement starts. Mathematics is the foundation of science. Physics must respect the scientific nature of mathematics and mathematical models. The SM must be based on mathematical models in order to be scientific, convincing, and in line with natural laws.
      I hope researchers are not fooled by the pseudoscientific theories of the Physical Review Letters (PRL), and hope more people dare to stand up and fight against rampant pseudoscience.
      The so-called academic journals (such as Physical Review Letters, Nature, Science, etc.) firmly believe that two high-dimensional spacetime objects (such as two sets of cobalt-60) rotating in opposite directions can be transformed into two objects that mirror each other, is a typical case of pseudoscience rampant.
      If researchers are really interested in Science and Physics, you can browse https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/643404671 and https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/595280873.

      Reply
    2. BibhutibhusanPatel on February 10, 2024 4:57 am

      The researchers are in an exact path to trace mechanical path for graviþy of quarks;Einstein’s GR is in good position applied to obtain result.Every aspect of the experiment is right;but,universe has a natural orientation to give perfect quantum gravity,not simpĺy the magntitude to establish in the laboratory otherwise achived from the other methods.

      Reply
    3. Stephen on February 10, 2024 5:45 pm

      I just saw an article recently about the way a quasar that was billions of light years away, emitted photons and other cosmic particles, in these 2 huge jets that ejected from opposite sides. As the view gets farther and farther away, these 2 streams that look like a simple up and down motion, turns into a huge sweeping motion that almost resembles the first picture in this article. Spooky

      Reply
    4. David Zarrin kalam on February 11, 2024 10:54 pm

      Gravitational force field around the Earth varies significantly yet it is not recorded or felt because of the rotation planets and stars this can be calculated easily
      I shall publish my new hypotheses shortly

      Reply
      • James P. on December 8, 2024 8:26 am

        Einstein believed in the Aether. Look up his comment at a lecture in 1920 on the topic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCm6eLP9zRw
        The concept of dark matter is just a new name for Aether. The properties of space contain what we call virtual vacuum energy, which creates virtual particles from an immediately adjacent dimension to our own “space-time” dimension. As an analog, consider how a mass is able to float on water, which we call buoyancy, where opposing reactive forces are in equilibrium. Space and matter also exhibit the traits of buoyancy as long as the opposing forces are in balance. Once the opposing forces are out of balance because of excessive mass that exceeds the energy of space at the interface, the high mass object sinks into the adjacent dimension but is still connected gravitationally and magnetically to our space-time dimension.
        This is best exemplified by black holes with massive density sinking into the “space” of the adjacent dimension. Consider that the virtual particles mentioned previously are a form of quark-gluon matter that comprise the adjacent dimension and are the force carriers for radiation, light, magnetism, and gravity.
        Food for thought.

        Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    New Study Reveals Why Ozempic Works Better for Some People Than Others

    Climate Change Is Altering a Key Greenhouse Gas in a Way Scientists Didn’t Expect

    New Study Suggests Gravitational Waves May Have Created Dark Matter

    Scientists Discover Why the Brain Gets Stuck in Schizophrenia

    Scientists Engineer “Tumor-Eating” Bacteria That Devour Cancer From Within

    Even “Failed” Diets May Deliver Long-Term Health Gains, Study Finds

    NIH Scientists Discover Powerful New Opioid That Relieves Pain Without Dangerous Side Effects

    Collapsing Plasma May Hold the Key to Cosmic Magnetism

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • This 15,000-Year-Old Discovery Changes What We Know About Early Human Creativity
    • 35-Million-Year-Old Mystery: Strange Arachnid Discovered Preserved in Amber
    • Revolutionary Gas Turbine Generates Power Without Air Compression
    • Is AI Really Just a Tool? It Could Be Altering How You See Reality
    • JWST Reveals a “Forbidden” Planet With a Baffling Composition
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.