Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Science»Evidence Against the Hypothesis That a Comet Impact Wiped Out Prehistoric Humans
    Science

    Evidence Against the Hypothesis That a Comet Impact Wiped Out Prehistoric Humans

    By University of Royal Holloway LondonJanuary 30, 2013No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Asteroid Impact Explosion Planet Earth Artist's Impression
    Research published in the journal Geophysical Monograph Series suggests that comet explosions were not responsible for the demise of the Clovis culture, a prehistoric human culture in North America, 13,000 years ago.

    New research provides evidence against the hypothesis that a large comet impact or airburst caused the termination of the Clovis culture.

    Comet explosions did not end the prehistoric human culture, known as Clovis, in North America 13,000 years ago, according to research published in the journal Geophysical Monograph Series.

    Researchers from Royal Holloway, together with Sandia National Laboratories and 13 other universities across the United States and Europe, have found evidence that rebuts the belief that a large impact or airburst caused a significant and abrupt change to the Earth’s climate and terminated the Clovis culture. They argue that other explanations must be found for the apparent disappearance.

    Prehistoric Human Stone Tool
    The Clovis culture is named after the town in New Mexico, where distinct stone tools were found in the 1920s and 1930s. Credit: University of Royal Holloway London

    Clovis is the name archaeologists have given to the earliest well-established human culture in the North American continent. It is named after the town in New Mexico, where distinct stone tools were found in the 1920s and 1930s.

    Researchers argue that no appropriately sized impact craters from that time period have been discovered, and no shocked material or any other features of impact have been found in sediments. They also found that samples presented in support of the impact hypothesis were contaminated with modern material and that no physics model can support the theory.

    “The theory has reached zombie status,” said Professor Andrew Scott from the Department of Earth Sciences at Royal Holloway. “Whenever we are able to show flaws and think it is dead, it reappears with new, equally unsatisfactory, arguments.

    “Hopefully new versions of the theory will be more carefully examined before they are published.”

    Reference: “Arguments and Evidence Against a Younger Dryas Impact Event” by M. Boslough, K. Nicoll, V. Holliday, T. L. Daulton, D. Meltzer, N. Pinter, A. C. Scott, T. Surovell, P. Claeys, J. Gill, F. Paquay, J. Marlon, P. Bartlein, C. Whitlock, D. Grayson and A.J.T. Jull, 1 January 2012, Geophysical Monograph Series.
    DOI: 10.1029/2012GM001209

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Earth Science Geophysics Royal Holloway Sandia National Laboratory University of London
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Want To Be Happy? Stoic Secrets To Overcome Modern Stress

    15 Miles in Diameter – Asteroid That Formed Earth’s Largest Crater Bigger Than Previously Believed

    New Study Traces the Impact of Volcanic Activity on Climate Change

    Earth’s Geomagnetic Field Intensity is Double the Historical Average

    Interplanetary Dust Particles Can Deliver Water and Organics to Terrestrial Planets

    High Resolution Maps Reveal Larger than Thought Gravitational Variations on Earth

    Researchers Study Flow Batteries Containing Metal-Based Ionic Liquids (MetILs)

    MIT Researchers Use Mathematical Model to Predict Speed of Spreading Valleys

    Sandia Chemists Use MOFs to Remove Radioactive Gas from Nuclear Fuel

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Breakthrough Bowel Cancer Trial Leaves Patients Cancer-Free for Nearly 3 Years

    Natural Compound Shows Powerful Potential Against Rheumatoid Arthritis

    100,000-Year-Old Neanderthal Fossils in Poland Reveal Unexpected Genetic Connections

    Simple “Gut Reset” May Prevent Weight Gain After Ozempic or Wegovy

    2.8 Days to Disaster: Scientists Warn Low Earth Orbit Could Suddenly Collapse

    Common Food Compound Shows Surprising Power Against Superbugs

    5 Simple Ways To Remember More and Forget Less

    The Atomic Gap That Could Cost the Semiconductor Industry Billions

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Scientists Develop Bioengineered Chewing Gum That Could Help Fight Oral Cancer
    • Popular Weight-Loss Drugs Found To Cut Heart Attack and Stroke Risk
    • After 37 Years, the World’s Longest-Running Soil Warming Experiment Uncovers a Startling Climate Secret
    • NASA Satellite Captures First-Ever High-Res View of Massive Pacific Tsunami
    • ADHD Isn’t Just a Deficit: Study Reveals Powerful Hidden Strengths
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.