Fusion Researchers Find Safer, More Effective Way to Create a Star on Earth

Fusion Reaction Artists Rendering

A major issue with operating ring-shaped fusion facilities known as tokamaks is keeping the plasma that fuels fusion reactions free of impurities that could reduce the efficiency of the reactions. Now, scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) have found that sprinkling a type of powder into the plasma could aid in harnessing the ultra-hot gas within a tokamak facility to produce heat to create electricity without producing greenhouse gases or long-term radioactive waste.

Fusion, the power that drives the sun and stars, combines light elements in the form of plasma — the hot, charged state of matter composed of free electrons and atomic nuclei — that generates massive amounts of energy. Scientists are seeking to replicate fusion on Earth for a virtually inexhaustible supply of power to generate electricity.

PPPL Physicist Robert Lunsford

PPPL physicist Robert Lunsford has completed research showing that injecting boron powder into fusion plasma can aid the fusion reactions. Credit: Elle Starkman / PPPL Office of Communications

“The main goal of the experiment was to see if we could lay down a layer of boron using a powder injector,” said PPPL physicist Robert Lunsford, lead author of the paper reporting the results in Nuclear Fusion. “So far, the experiment appears to have been successful.”

­The boron prevents an element known as tungsten from leaching out of the tokamak walls into the plasma, where it can cool the plasma particles and make fusion reactions less efficient. A layer of boron is applied to plasma-facing surfaces in a process known as “boronization.” Scientists want to keep the plasma as hot as possible — at least ten times hotter than the surface of the sun — to maximize the fusion reactions and therefore the heat to create electricity.

Using powder to provide boronization is also far safer than using a boron gas called diborane, the method used today. “Diborane gas is explosive, so everybody has to leave the building housing the tokamak during the process,” Lunsford said. “On the other hand, if you could just drop some boron powder into the plasma, that would be a lot easier to manage. While diborane gas is explosive and toxic, boron powder is inert,” he added. “This new technique would be less intrusive and definitely less dangerous.”

Another advantage is that while physicists must halt tokamak operations during the boron gas process, boron powder can be added to the plasma while the machine is running. This feature is important because to provide a constant source of electricity, future fusion facilities will have to run for long, uninterrupted periods of time. “This is one way to get to a steady-state fusion machine,” Lunsford said. “You can add more boron without having to completely shut down the machine.”

There are other reasons to use a powder dropper to coat the inner surfaces of a tokamak. For example, the researchers discovered that injecting boron powder has the same benefit as puffing nitrogen gas into the plasma — both techniques increase the heat at the plasma edge, which increases how well the plasma stays confined within the magnetic fields.

The powder dropper technique also gives scientists an easy way to create low-density fusion plasmas, important because low density allows plasma instabilities to be suppressed by magnetic pulses, a relatively simple way to improve fusion reactions. Scientists could use powder to create low-density plasmas at any time, rather than waiting for a gaseous boronization. Being able to create a wide range of plasma conditions easily in this way would enable physicists to explore the behavior of plasma more thoroughly.

In the future, Lunsford and the other scientists in the group hope to conduct experiments to determine where, exactly, the material goes after it has been injected into the plasma. Physicists currently hypothesize that the powder flows to the top and bottom of the tokamak chamber, the same way the plasma flows, “but it would be useful to have that hypothesis backed up by modeling so we know the exact locations within the tokamak that are getting the boron layers,” Lunsford said.

Reference: “Active conditioning of ASDEX Upgrade tungsten plasma-facing components and discharge enhancement through boron and boron nitride particulate injection” by R. Lunsford, V. Rohde, A. Bortolon, R. Dux, A. Herrmann, A. Kallenbach, R.M. McDermott, P. David, A. Drenik, F. Laggner, R. Maingi, D. K. Mansfield, A. Nagy, R. Neu, E. Wolfrum and the ASDEX Upgrade team, 14 October 2019, Nuclear Fusion.
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab4095

This research was supported by the DOE Office of Science (FES) and the Euratom research and training program. The research group included collaborators from Germany’s Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.

4 Comments on "Fusion Researchers Find Safer, More Effective Way to Create a Star on Earth"

  1. After 60+ years of trying to make fusion work, how about taking some of those brains and funding and putting them to work on using the fusion source we already have, the BFRS (Big Fusion Reactor in the Sky)? WTFIC, I suggest we get serious about this:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/09597b104b84e91f1e31dae27c07cefbb9984224ce373d4fe4c98b503d0669c9.jpg

  2. Jeffery A clark | December 24, 2019 at 7:38 pm | Reply

    Why don’t we just go to bomb in a bottle technology? We’ve known how to do it since the 1950s.pulsed fusion solves a myriad of problems. Including pulling power directly from the fusion reaction rather than heating water to spin turbines.

  3. Vernon Brechin | December 24, 2019 at 8:13 pm | Reply

    Many nuclear fusion physicists have long agreed that pulsed nuclear fission reactions, such as laser inertial confinement fusion (ICF) is not a practical approach to nuclear fusion power generation. The current duty-cycles would need to increase by several orders of magnitude. Most of such ICF machines are funded as nuclear weapons research projects but they are often promoted to the general public as being practical paths to fusion energy generation. Those, who are skeptical, should look at the historical track record of the NIF facility in Livermore, California, and all those NIF experiments that preceded it.

    Critical thinkers should ask themselves why it it that most previous hype of magnetic confinement fusion (MCF) advances tended to never mention the issue with tungsten contamination, or of the need of boron to try to counteract the tungsten issue.

    There are still a great many issues to be dealt with before their will be a break-even ICF and MCF reaction, let alone a reaction that goes orders of magnitudes beyond that to generate competitive amounts of nuclear fusion generated electrical energy.

  4. The only thing they are trying to achieve, is a complex technology, that will secure their future jobs.
    Just like the internal combustion engine, wiyh thousands of useless pieces.
    We invented in the ’60s some very good linear generators. Why it took it 50 years now to have hybrid cars ?
    Its all a scam. Fusion can be studied in a small lab, not a 30floors building. Its all a scam. By the time they will get there, they will have sucked all money from economy…. there will still be no free energy. They want to secure a bad strategy. Please stop believing these greedy people.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.