Good News: The World Can Now Breathe Easier

Planet Earth Glow

New research examines the health risks of PM2.5 and global reduction efforts. It highlights a study showing a decrease in global PM2.5 exposure since 2011, mainly due to China’s efforts. The article underscores the health benefits of reduced exposure and the necessity for continued monitoring and mitigation, particularly in densely populated regions.

WashU researchers, who quantified changes in air pollution from 1998 to 2019, state that further mitigation is still necessary.

Ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a significant global environmental health risk. These particles, measuring 2.5 micrometers or smaller, are sufficiently tiny to be inhaled, leading to various health issues. They can trigger respiratory conditions like asthma and bronchitis, as well as cardiovascular problems, including heart attacks and high blood pressure. In children, exposure to PM2.5 can lead to lasting developmental challenges. Moreover, for people at large, PM2.5 exposure is linked with an increased risk of premature mortality.

To ameliorate these wide-ranging negative impacts resulting from exposure to PM2.5, which is produced largely through traditional energy sources such as burning fossil fuels or wood, several countries have taken steps to reduce exposure to PM2.5. But how effective have these mitigation efforts been, and what region or regions are most responsible for driving global PM2.5 reduction?

Research Findings on PM2.5

Researchers working with Randall Martin, the Raymond R. Tucker Distinguished Professor in the McKelvey School of Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis, examined PM2.5 data from 1998 to 2019 to find out.

“The importance of PM2.5 as a leading risk factor for human health motivates assessment of its long-term changes,” Martin said. “We sought to analyze our satellite-derived PM2.5 estimates for insight into global and regional changes in PM2.5 exposure and its health effects.”

The team’s analysis, published Sept. 2 in Nature Communications, showed that global, population-weighted PM2.5 exposure, related to both pollution levels and population size, increased from 1998 to a peak in 2011, then decreased steadily from 2011 to 2019, largely driven by exposure reduction in China and slower growth in other regions.

Reversal of Trends in Global Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution

Randall Martin and Chi Li found a general reversal of trends in PM2.5 air pollution around the world. These maps show trends in population-weighted PM2.5 for 204 territories from 1998-2011 and 2011-2019. Credit: Martin lab, Washington University in St. Louis

“Before this work, there was a knowledge gap regarding quantitative local/regional contributions to global population exposure to PM2.5 and its changes,” said Chi Li, the first author on the study and a staff scientist in Martin’s research group. “We developed a new regional decomposition approach that jointly considered pollution level and population size, and from that, we depicted the first-ever time series of regional contributions to global PM2.5 air pollution.”

Li found that many regions exhibited decreasing exposure since 2011, including continuous reductions in North America and western Europe. He described recent emerging decreases in China as particularly striking.

“Rigorous air quality management in China, which has been most pronounced since 2013, turned out to be the biggest contributor to this global reversal,” Li said. “More than 90% of the reduction of global mean exposure from 2011 to 2019 is from China, according to our regional attribution. This result was astonishing when it was derived, but it could be explained well by the rapid reduction of PM2.5 concentrations due to China’s mitigation efforts, which benefit nearly one-fifth of the global population.”

Health Benefits of PM2.5 Reduction

Benefits from PM2.5 exposure reduction include 1.1 million fewer premature deaths in China alone between 2011 and 2019, as well as improved health more generally. Future interventions to reduce PM2.5 exposure will have even greater impacts for an aging and growing global population, Li said.

“By combining PM2.5 data with health data and exposure-response models, we also revealed that, despite the recent sustained reduction of global PM2.5 pollution, population aging, and growth are now the main challenges in alleviating PM2.5 health impacts,” Li said. “Reducing the same amount of PM2.5 now will have stronger health benefits than it would have 20 years ago, a globally prevalent phenomenon highlighted in our study.”

The team calculated that in 2019, there were still millions of premature deaths worldwide that could be attributed to PM2.5, highlighting the urgent need for continued reduction of PM2.5 exposure. Careful monitoring, especially in regions that are currently poorly monitored but highly populated, including South Asia and the Middle East, will be critical to ongoing improvements in air quality and to evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation efforts, Martin said.

“There is a need to continue to sustain and develop global monitoring capabilities for PM2.5 both from satellite, but also from ground-based measurements,” Martin said. “The successes in PM2.5 reductions serve to demonstrate the benefits of PM2.5 mitigation efforts, and to motivate further mitigation.”

Reference: “Reversal of trends in global fine particulate matter air pollution” by Chi Li, Aaron van Donkelaar, Melanie S. Hammer, Erin E. McDuffie, Richard T. Burnett, Joseph V. Spadaro, Deepangsu Chatterjee, Aaron J. Cohen, Joshua S. Apte, Veronica A. Southerland, Susan C. Anenberg, Michael Brauer and Randall V. Martin, 2 September 2023, Nature Communications.
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41086-z

This work was supported by NASA (80NSSC21K0508, 80NSSC22K0200, and 80NSSC21K0511). All data and codes used for analyses and visualizations in this work are available at 10.5281/zenodo.7618789 along with detailed supporting documentation.

1 Comment on "Good News: The World Can Now Breathe Easier"

  1. Does burning marijuana produce PM2.5 along with carbon monoxide and volatile organic material? If so, why is society encouraging greater availability and accessibility?

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.