NIST Breakthrough: Simple Material Could Scrub Carbon Dioxide From Power Plant Smokestacks

MOF Aluminum Formate

Exhaust from coal-fired power plants, at left, contain large quantities of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (purple tripartite molecules). Aluminum formate, a metal-organic framework whose structure is highlighted at right, can selectively capture carbon dioxide from dried flue gas conditions, potentially at a fraction of the cost of using other carbon filtration materials. Credit: B. Hayes / NIST

Easily synthesized chemical filter could stop the greenhouse gas from reaching the atmosphere.

How can carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, be removed from the exhaust of fossil fuel power plants before it ever enters the atmosphere? New research findings suggest that a promising answer lies in a simple, economical, and potentially reusable material that was analyzed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Scientists there from multiple institutions have determined why this material works as well as it does.

Aluminum formate was the team’s object of study. It is one of a class of substances called metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). As a group, MOFs have exhibited tremendous potential for filtering and separating organic materials — often the various hydrocarbons in fossil fuels — from one another. Some MOFs have shown promise at refining natural gas or separating the octane components of gasoline; others might contribute to reducing the cost of plastics manufacturing or cheaply converting one substance to another. Their capacity to perform such separations comes from their inherently porous nature.

Aluminum formate, which the scientists refer to as ALF, has a talent for separating carbon dioxide (CO2) from the other gases that commonly fly out of the smokestacks of coal-fired power plants. According to NIST’s Hayden Evans, it also lacks the shortcomings that other proposed carbon filtration materials have. Evans is one of the lead authors of the team’s research paper, which was published on November 2 in the peer-reviewed journal Science Advances.

“What makes this work exciting is that ALF performs really well relative to other high-performing CO2 adsorbents, but it rivals designer compounds in its simplicity, overall stability and ease of preparation,” said Evans, a chemist at the NIST Center for Neutron Research (NCNR). “It is made of two substances found easily and abundantly, so creating enough ALF to use widely should be possible at very low cost.”

Scientists from the National University of Singapore; Singapore’s Agency for Science, Technology and Research; the University of Delaware; and the University of California, Santa Barbara were included on the research team.

Approximately 30% of global CO2 emissions are attributable to coal-fired power plants. Even as the world embraces other energy sources such as solar and wind power that do not generate greenhouse gases, finding a way to reduce the carbon output of existing plants could help mitigate their effects while they remain in operation.

A logical approach is to scrub the CO2 from flue gas before it reaches the atmosphere in the first place. However, it has proved challenging to create an effective scrubber. The mixture of gases that flows up the smokestacks of coal-fired power plants is typically fairly hot, humid, and corrosive — characteristics that have made it difficult to find an economical material that can do the job efficiently. Some other MOFs work well but are made of expensive materials; others are less costly in and of themselves but perform adequately only in dry conditions, requiring a “drying step” that reduces the gas humidity but raises the overall cost of the scrubbing process.

“Put it all together, you need some kind of wonder material,” Evans said. “Here, we’ve managed to tick every box except stability in very humid conditions. However, using ALF would be inexpensive enough that a drying step becomes a viable option.”

ALF is made from aluminum hydroxide and formic acid, two chemicals that are abundant and readily available on the market. It would cost less than a dollar per kilogram, Evans said, which is up to 100 times less expensive than other materials with similar performance. Low cost is important because carbon capture at a single plant could require up to tens of thousands of tons of filtration material. The amount needed for the entire world would be enormous.

On a microscopic scale, ALF resembles a three-dimensional wire cage with innumerable small holes. These holes are just large enough to allow CO2 molecules to enter and get trapped, but just small enough to exclude the slightly larger nitrogen molecules that make up the majority of flue gas. Neutron diffraction work at the NCNR showed the team how the individual cages in the material collect and fill with CO2, revealing that the gas molecules fit inside certain cages within ALF like a hand in a glove, Evans said.

Despite its potential, ALF is not ready for immediate use. Engineers would need to design a procedure to create ALF at large scales. A coal-fired plant would also need a compatible process to reduce the humidity of the flue gas before scrubbing it. Evans said that a great deal is already understood about how to address these issues, and that they would not make the cost of using ALF prohibitive.

What to do with the CO2 afterward is also a major question, he said, though this is a problem for all carbon-capture materials. There are research efforts underway to convert it to formic acid — which is not only a naturally occurring organic material but also one of the two constituents of ALF. The idea here is that ALF could become part of a cyclic process where ALF removes CO2 from the exhaust streams, and that captured CO2 is used to create more formic acid. This formic acid would then be used to make more ALF, further reducing the overall impact and cost of the material cycle.

“There is a great deal of research going on nowadays into the problem of what to do with all the captured CO2,” Evans said. “It seems possible that we could eventually use solar energy to split hydrogen from water, and then combine that hydrogen with the CO2 to make more formic acid. Combined with ALF, that’s a solution that would help the planet.”

Reference: “Aluminum formate, Al(HCOO)3: An earth-abundant, scalable, and highly selective material for CO2 capture” by Hayden A. Evans, Dinesh Mullangi, Zeyu Deng, Yuxiang Wang, Shing Bo Peh, Fengxia Wei, John Wang, Craig M. Brown, Dan Zhao, Pieremanuele Canepa and Anthony K. Cheetham, 2 November 2022, Science Advances.
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ade1473

5 Comments on "NIST Breakthrough: Simple Material Could Scrub Carbon Dioxide From Power Plant Smokestacks"

  1. Now you tell us? After Mr Sniffly just announced that greedy thunderburger & John cerry-a-big-stick will remove all stacks in the next year as the seas will be moving in!! Run! Hide!

  2. When will these carbon capture theorists (subsidized bandits) realize that it’s not the method, it’s the total scaled-up amount captured that counts. The combined efforts of all these technologies is unable to safely store even one ppm of CO2, which is 7,800 million metric tons. These ideas designed to affect the climate are all scams.

    • Cynthia Binder | November 10, 2022 at 6:24 am | Reply

      Disagree co2 results r fossil age molecular millions years old. Just co2 is for plants n human exhale co2. 🥶 Icy earth is warming🤬 up. Jungle time. Not a scam. Co2 comes also from humans……🤓🌐

  3. Steve Nordquist | November 7, 2022 at 11:10 pm | Reply

    If the plot to put the CO2 out wasn’t a scam to you, how did the plot to extract and sequester it earn that distinction from you? Wrong answers only.

    E.g. I can’t make a scalable loop out of these earth-common materials because I can only ensure ‘horde buildings’ full of diamondene, very wrinkly large sheet graphene, and vanadium antimonide gallinate, that’s my tier.

    My balls go blue about 8 gigaton in, that’s why I can’t mount the wellhead before then, and why my proof of principle is that size. Yes I have a 3 day refractory period.

  4. Cynthia Binder | November 10, 2022 at 6:17 am | Reply

    Decades of proven it can be accomplished. Results are proof. This small ⚖ 📐 📏 ⚖ enlarged take ______? Ozone layer might thanks 😊 🙏 outer space inside atmosphere. 🤓🏭🥼

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.