Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Space»Our Current Understanding of the Formation of the Moon May Be Wrong
    Space

    Our Current Understanding of the Formation of the Moon May Be Wrong

    By University of New MexicoMarch 14, 20205 Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Moons Composition
    The Earth and Moon have distinct oxygen compositions and are not identical in oxygen new research suggests. Credit: UNM

    Scientists Find Earth and Moon Not Identical Oxygen Twins

    Scientists at The University of New Mexico (UNM) have found that the Earth and Moon have distinct oxygen compositions and are not identical in oxygen as previously thought according to a new study published on March 9, 2020, in the journal Nature Geoscience.

    Entitled “Distinct oxygen isotope compositions of the Earth and Moon,” the research paper may challenge the current understanding of the formation of the Moon.

    Previous research led to scientists to develop the Giant Impact Hypothesis suggesting the Moon was formed from debris following a giant collision between early-Earth and a proto-planet named Theia. The Earth and Moon are geochemically similar. Samples returned from the Moon from the Apollo missions showed a near-identical composition in oxygen isotopes.

    Although the Giant Impact Hypothesis can nicely explain many of the geochemical similarities between Earth and the Moon, the extreme similarity in oxygen isotopes has been difficult to rationalize with this scenario: either the two bodies were compositionally identical in oxygen isotopes to start with, which is unlikely, or their oxygen isotopes were fully mixed in the aftermath of the impact, which has been difficult to model in simulations.

    Erick Cano CSI lab
    Research Assistant Erick Cano works in UNM’s Center for Stable Isotopes. Credit: Steve Carr

    “Our findings suggest that the deep lunar mantle may have experienced the least mixing and is most representative of the impactor Theia,” said Erick Cano. “The data imply the distinct oxygen isotope compositions of Theia and Earth were not completely homogenized by the Moon-forming impact and provides quantitative evidence that Theia could have formed farther from the Sun than did Earth.”

    To arrive at their findings, Cano, a research scientist, and along with colleagues Zach Sharp and Charles Shearer from UNM’s Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, conducted high-precision measurements of the oxygen isotopic composition on a range of lunar samples at UNM’s Center for Stable Isotopes (CSI).  The samples included basalts, highland anorthosites, norites, and volcanic glass, a product of uncrystallized rapidly cooled magma.

    They found that the oxygen isotopic composition varied depending on the type of rock tested. This may be due to the degree of mixing between the molten Moon and vapor atmosphere following the impact. Oxygen isotopes from samples taken from the deep lunar mantle were the most different to oxygen isotopes from Earth

    “This data suggests that the deep lunar mantle may have experienced the least mixing and is most representative of the impactor Theia,” said Sharp. “Based on the results from our isotopic analysis, Theia would have an origin farther out from the Sun relative to Earth and shows that Theia’s distinct oxygen isotope composition was not completely lost through homogenization during the giant impact.”

    The research is important because it eliminates the need for giant-impact models that include a complete oxygen isotope homogenization between the Earth and the Moon, and provides a foundation for future modeling of the impact and lunar formation.

    Reference: “Distinct oxygen isotope compositions of the Earth and Moon” by Erick J. Cano, Zachary D. Sharp and Charles K. Shearer, 9 March 2020, Nature Geoscience.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-0550-0

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Astronomy Geology Moon Popular University of New Mexico
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    See the First-Ever Comprehensive Geologic Map of the Moon

    NASA GRAIL Mission Provides Insights into Moon Impacts

    New Study Reveals Amount of Water Present in the Moon May Have Been Overestimated

    Scientists Detect Magmatic Water in Bullialdus Crater on the Moon

    Hubble Data Reveals a New Neptune Moon

    Pre-existing Mineral Deposits on the Moon Can Survive Lunar Impacts

    Presence of Water in the Primary Crust Indicates That the Early Moon Was Wet

    GRAIL Generates High Resolution Gravity Field Map of the Moon

    Simulation May Explain Saturnian System

    5 Comments

    1. Petraq Lame Gjoka on March 14, 2020 6:44 am

      The same atmosphere of the formations performed in endlessness does not mean that the Earth and Moon have the same initial point of creation, and the different atmosphere of the formations performed in endlessness does not mean that the Earth and Moon have not the same initial point.
      The formations are performed independently apart from each other throughout the endlessness in the same moment and in the same way in cooperation with each other moment after moment in battle for life. The formations are performed integrating by joining of infinite others and disintegrating performed by them infinite others etc.,etc. The atmosphere as part of the formations is performed quite independently on each other and continue in the same way in cooperation changing each other. The difference or the same atmosphere does not show for the Earth and Moon to have been separated by each other. The attempt in this direction is spending time in vain.

      Reply
      • Torbjörn Larsson on March 15, 2020 8:45 am

        This is not spending time in vain, since the great impact hypothesis uniquely explains the momentum of the Earth-Moon system, as well as – obviously – the nearly same but not identical elements and isotopes of elements of which some are described in the article.

        On the contrary, people have in vain tried competing models, but they don’t look as good.

        Reply
    2. flow in on March 14, 2020 7:04 pm

      the idea that an impact was required to make the moon is simply wrong.

      The earth is a bubble, and so is the moon. All it takes to calve the moon away is to have a large body pass close to the earth. The resultant gravity well interactions do the rest, resulting in a phase locked moon with lots of impacts on the far side, and an asteroid belt.

      Planets are hollow. Formed through self-stable vorticies.

      Reply
      • Torbjörn Larsson on March 15, 2020 8:47 am

        Such an idea would not explain the angular momentum of even Earth or better yet the Earth-Moon system orbital momentum as the great impact (of non-hollow bodies) explain. And it would not, say, explain the mixing of grains with different oxygen isotope ratios seen as described in the article.

        Reply
    3. Torbjörn Larsson on March 15, 2020 8:41 am

      This opening up of the parameter space for the Moon forming impactor is interesting in the context of the proposed ages of Earth and Mars.

      Earth may have formed quickly by pebble showers at a system age of ~ 5 Myrs [ https://www.space.com/meteorite-iron-shows-earth-formed-fast.html ].

      But Mars growth was cut off at ~ 10 Myrs age by the gas giant migration [ https://www.space.com/early-mars-formed-slow-ancient-collisions-show.html , https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/cataclysmic-bashing-giant-planets-occurred-early-our-solar-systems-history ].

      The new result would not immediately tell us the mass of the impactor, but its late arrival at ~50 Myrs system age may be caused by migration from far out instead of being Mars massed and related to Mars growth zone. C.f. Triton captured by Neptune, or Ceres captured by the asteroid belt.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Mezcal “Worm” in a Bottle Mystery: DNA Testing Reveals a Surprise

    New Research Reveals That Your Morning Coffee Activates an Ancient Longevity Switch

    This Is What Makes You Irresistible to Mosquitoes

    Shockingly Powerful Giant Octopuses Ruled the Seas 100 Million Years Ago

    Scientists Stunned by New Organic Molecules Found on Mars

    Rewriting Dinosaur Evolution: Scientists Unearth Remarkable 150-Million-Year-Old Stegosaur Skull

    Omega-3 Supplements Linked to Cognitive Decline in Surprising New Study

    First-of-Its-Kind Discovery: Homer’s Iliad Found Embedded in a 1,600-Year-Old Egyptian Mummy

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Male Birth Control Breakthrough: Scientists Find Way To Turn Sperm Production Off and Back On
    • A Common Vitamin Could Hold the Key to Treating Fatty Liver Disease
    • New Research Shows Vitamin B12 May Hold the Key to Healthy Aging
    • Scientists Map Thousands of Brain Connections With RNA Barcodes
    • This Gene Tweak Turns Strawberries Into Healthier, Tastier Superfruit
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.