Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Physics»Physicist Solves 120-Year-Old Thermodynamics Puzzle and Corrects Einstein
    Physics

    Physicist Solves 120-Year-Old Thermodynamics Puzzle and Corrects Einstein

    By University of SevilleJune 26, 202526 Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Thermodynamics Experiment Art
    A thermodynamics mystery dating back to 1905 has been resolved by University of Seville professor José María Martín-Olalla, who demonstrates that the Nernst theorem is inherently tied to the second law of thermodynamics. His reinterpretation corrects a long-standing assumption made by Einstein, reframing how physicists understand the behavior of entropy near absolute zero. Credit: SciTechDaily.com

    The paper argues that the third principle of thermodynamics follows from the second principle, rather than being a separate or independent concept.

    Professor José María Martín-Olalla of the University of Seville has published a paper addressing a thermodynamics problem that has remained unresolved for 120 years. In doing so, he corrects an idea proposed by Albert Einstein more than a century ago.

    The paper links Nernst’s theorem, an experimental observation from 1905 stating that entropy exchanges approach zero as temperature approaches zero, directly to the second principle of thermodynamics. Published in The European Physical Journal Plus, the study extends the implications of the second principle, which states that entropy in the universe tends to increase.

    The historical problem of absolute zero

    The problem surrounding Nernst’s theorem emerged in the early 20th century, during investigations into how matter behaves at temperatures near absolute zero (minus 273 degrees Celsius). Walther Nernst received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1920 for his contributions to this field.

    To explain his findings, Nernst argued that absolute zero must be unreachable. Otherwise, one could theoretically construct an engine that uses absolute zero as a coolant to convert all heat into work, violating the principle that entropy always increases. He used this reasoning to formally state his theorem in 1912.

    Soon after, Albert Einstein challenged the argument by noting that such an engine could not actually be built, and therefore it posed no real threat to the second law of thermodynamics. As a result, Einstein separated Nernst’s theorem from the second principle and classified it as a third, independent principle. That interpretation has now been overturned.

    In the demonstration presented, Professor Martín-Olalla introduces two nuances that were omitted by Nernst and Einstein: the formalism of the second principle of thermodynamics, on the one hand, requires the existence of the engine imagined by Nernst, and, on the other hand, that this machine be virtual; the engine does not consume any heat, does not produce any work, and does not question the second principle. The concatenation of both ideas allows us to conclude that entropy exchanges tend to zero when the temperature tends to zero (which is Nernst’s theorem) and that absolute zero is inaccessible.

    Rethinking temperature and physical abstraction

    Martin-Olalla points out, “a fundamental problem in thermodynamics is to distinguish the sensation of temperature, the sensations of hot and cold, from the abstract concept of temperature as a physical quantity. In the discussion between Nernst and Einstein, temperature was merely an empirical parameter: the absolute zero condition was represented by the condition that the pressure or volume of a gas became close to zero. Formally, the second principle of thermodynamics provides a more concrete idea of the natural zero of temperature. The idea is not related to any sensation, but to that engine imagined by Nernst but which has to be virtual. This radically changes the approach to the proof of the theorem.”

    The study points out that the only general property of matter near absolute zero that cannot be related to the second principle of thermodynamics is the cancellation of heat capacities, also compiled by Nernst in 1912. However, Martin-Olalla proposes a different formalization: “The second principle contains the idea that entropy is unique at absolute zero. The cancellation of specific heats only adds that this unique value is zero. It seems more like an important appendix than a new principle.”

    The professor at the University of Seville points out that the publication of this article is a first step towards the acceptance of this novel point of view: “The students on the thermodynamics course I teach were the first to learn about this demonstration. I hope that with this publication the demonstration will become better known, but I know that the academic world has a great deal of inertia.”

    Reference: “Proof of the Nernst theorem” by Jose-María Martín-Olalla, 13 June 2025, The European Physical Journal Plus.
    DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06503-w

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Heat Matter Popular Thermodynamics University of Seville
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Absolute Zero Is Attainable? Scientists Have Found a Quantum Formulation for the Third Law of Thermodynamics

    Physics Breakthrough: Researchers Overcome Long-Standing Limitation of First Law of Thermodynamics

    Unsolved for 500 Years: Researchers Crack Leonardo da Vinci’s Paradox

    Unraveling a Cosmic Antimatter Mystery

    Zentropy: New Theory of Entropy May Solve Materials Design Issues

    Creating Liquid Shapes That Are Nearly Impossible To Find in Nature: Physicists Make Square Droplets and Liquid Lattices

    New Fundamental Limits Beyond the Standard Laws of Thermodynamics Found in Maxwell’s Demon Experiment

    Physicists Discover Way to “Switch” Between the Different States of Matter

    Nanoparticle Temporarily Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics

    26 Comments

    1. Bao-hua ZHANG on June 26, 2025 10:25 pm

      In the demonstration presented, Professor Martín-Olalla introduces two nuances that were omitted by Nernst and Einstein: the formalism of the second principle of thermodynamics, on the one hand, requires the existence of the engine imagined by Nernst, and, on the other hand, that this machine be virtual; the engine does not consume any heat, does not produce any work, and does not question the second principle. The concatenation of both ideas allows us to conclude that entropy exchanges tend to zero when the temperature tends to zero (which is Nernst’s theorem) and that absolute zero is inaccessible.
      VERY GOOD!

      According to the topological vortex theory (TVT), when entropy exchanges tend to zero, absolute zero is inaccessible.

      If researchers are interested in this, please visit https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/1917878197971816654.

      Reply
      • Bao-hau ZHANG on June 26, 2025 10:35 pm

        Today’s physics and the so-called peer-reviewed publications stubbornly insists on two sets of cobalt-60 rotating in opposite directions, whether symmetrical or not, they are two mirror images of each other. It is a typical manifestation of pseudoscience’s rampant and domineering behavior.

        Reply
        • AG3 on June 27, 2025 4:12 pm

          The guy in this article opposed Einstein, and still got kudos for his work. No one held him back. The old boys club didn’t threaten him. The publications didn’t blacklist him.
          There is no conspiracy in “today’s physics”
          You don’t get published because you aren’t any good. If you could prove this result (in this article) using vortices, you would have done so. But you couldn’t, and still can’t.

          Maybe instead of spamming this blog constantly for years, with the same BS claims no one cares about, you could focus on understanding why everyone rejects your ideas. If everyone in the world seems crazy, it is time to examine your head.

          Reply
          • Bao-hua ZHANG on June 27, 2025 5:11 pm

            VERY GOOD! Very exciting!
            Please continue to believe that the two sets of cobalt-60 rotating in opposite directions, whether symmetrical or not, are two mirror images of each other and should receive the Nobel Prize. This is today’s physics, this is the science you believe in, this is the dogma that all people believe in.
            I don’t know if you are fooling the public or if the public is fooling you?
            You are using facts to tell the public how crazy the negative impact of pseudoscience is.

            Reply
            • AG3 on June 28, 2025 9:02 am

              Again, you should worry if all of public, all your responders here, and all of the Nobel committee seem like fools to you. Likely it is that you are the fool. Especially since with all your vortex talk, you haven’t been able to prove any of the results that scientists here are proving. It’s time for you to show up with actual results. Calling Nobel laureates morons does not make you look smart. Or, sane.

            • Bao-hua ZHANG on June 29, 2025 3:33 pm

              @AG3
              Thank you for participating in the SciTechDaily comments.

              When the so-called official publications of physics suppress my theories everywhere. Your interaction with me, may raise doubts among some people. Whether it is foolish or honest, you only need to answer one question to the public, the Nobel Committee, and the so-called peer-reviewed publications:

              Two sets of cobalt-60 rotating in opposite directions, if they exhibit asymmetry, are they two objects that are mirror images of each other?

              YES or NO.

          • Voice of Reason on July 3, 2025 3:06 pm

            1) There is a massive effort to subvert actual science in the scientific communities. If you don’t see that or understand that that’s a personal problem.

            2) The article was written very poorly as most are these days. No one seems to be able to write or articulate their ideas very well and editing or having editors for a particular website seem to have died as well. Most people couldn’t make heads or tails of what was being explained here even if you were an expert on it. That is why most of the comments on this thread have nothing to do with the article at all.

            Reply
            • Bao-hua ZHANG on July 3, 2025 11:19 pm

              VERY GOOD! In some senses your criticisms were justified.

              It should be noted that the so-called peer-reviewed publications cannot represent the scientific community. There is a massive effort to subvert actual science in the so-called peer-reviewed publications not the scientific community.

            • Bao-hua ZHANG on July 3, 2025 11:30 pm

              For example, two sets of cobalt-60 artificially rotating in opposite directions, whether symmetrical or not, are two mirror images of each other, and based on this, the theory that won the Nobel Prize in Physics is deduced. This is already a scientific axiom.

      • Jose p koshy on June 27, 2025 8:59 pm

        The difference between the abstract concept of temperature and the sensation of hot and cold is the starting point of thermodynamics. The real problem is the present Kelvin scale. The Kelvin scale should be from (-infinity) to (+infinity), like other temperature scales. Then absolute zero will be around 0.7K. Below that, temperature (hotness) has to be negative. Then hot and cold states can be defined scientifically. Then at absolute zero, the entropy will be normal (neither hot not cold), making hot and cold states potential states.

        Reply
      • Gen on June 29, 2025 5:21 pm

        When water turns to ice it’s a zero. No rocket science

        Reply
    2. Rowan Brad Quni on June 27, 2025 9:37 am

      I’m learning it’s not hard to correct Einstein, who seemed to forget how algebra works in his later career while searching for a unification theory. He seems to have forgotten the 2 most important physics equations, E=mc^2 and E=hf–which both bear his name–share a common “E” that links them as the classical-quantum bridge we’ve been trying to find for 125 years.

      Reply
      • Rowan Brad Quni on June 27, 2025 9:39 am

        …and, what was it about 1905? It seems half of what we still call physics was published that year.

        Reply
        • Bao-hua ZHANG on June 27, 2025 3:01 pm

          Although mathematics is the language of science, we should not ignore whether the nature of the world is geometric shapes, mathematical codes, or formulas.

          Reply
        • Bao-hua ZHANG on June 27, 2025 5:31 pm

          Today’s physics and so-called peer-reviewed publications are crazily searching for the particles from God, but ignoring the fact that space can form spatiotemporal vortices and nucleation through its own dynamic evolution. This is the rampant prevalence of pseudoscience, which poses the greatest threat to the development of science. They are collectively obsessed with specific individuals, institutions, and groups, and have long deviated significantly from science.

          Reply
        • Bob on June 27, 2025 8:44 pm

          Which amuses me to think that knowledge of physics has a half-life, which leads to Zeno’s conclusion that he will never get to the finishing pole despite ever-increasing numbers of publications scattered about his track. So we go from Archimedes to 1905, and then keep dividing by 2 until we can learn approximately when we will never discover anything new, despite a humungous mass of papers that drown the gutters of the world in wasted ink………….keep laughing!.

          Reply
      • kindlin on June 27, 2025 12:12 pm

        That doesn’t really link classical and quantum, it lets us translate between different perspectives in one sense, from waves frequencies to masses. We need to understand what a quantized gravity or a smoothed quantum background look like to be able to resolve the many quantum gravity questions.

        Reply
        • Bao-hua ZHANG on June 27, 2025 3:09 pm

          Today’s physics has been severely misled by so-called peer-reviewed publications. They revel collectively for particles from God, but ignore the fact that space can dynamically evolve into vortices and nucleate through its own dynamics.

          Reply
        • Arve on June 27, 2025 4:55 pm

          Just a regular person here. So was Einstein’s theory unequivocally proven wrong?

          Reply
      • Bao-hua ZHANG on June 27, 2025 5:19 pm

        Although mathematics is the language of science, we should not ignore whether the real world is geometric shapes, mathematical codes, or formulas. Using mathematical codes and formulas to interpret the geometric shapes of the real world is what mathematics and physics should do.

        Reply
    3. RayRay B on June 28, 2025 3:27 am

      So based on that principle that an engine can be created if absolute zero could be a Panama, doesn’t it still allow us to create an engine for the coldest temperature we can attain? Just leaving everything at a greater temperature available to create this work?

      Reply
    4. RayRay B on June 28, 2025 3:29 am

      I apologize I talk text my last response. Here’s what it should have said:

      So based on that principle that an engine can be created if absolute zero could be unattainable , doesn’t it still allow us to create an engine for the coldest temperature we can attain? Just leaving everything at a greater temperature available to create this work?
      Also I forgot to ask if I absolutely zero exists somewhere.{

      Reply
    5. Dingo bay rum on June 28, 2025 11:01 am

      Your expla nation Need’s to be better

      Reply
    6. RandomAutisticFella on June 28, 2025 3:32 pm

      Not a mathematician or scienctist yet but based on what apper to be the general opinion on the matter this is pseudo-science and thus cringe

      Reply
    7. mczonkwa on June 29, 2025 2:52 am

      We need to dive deeper into some unsettling assumptions that are raising eyebrows. It’s time for a thorough investigation!

      Reply
    8. Юрис on July 6, 2025 9:41 pm

      мое имя Юрис, как адвокат Бога, заявляю что в вечном двигателе созданном богом, все работает по саморегуляции. я как очередной наладчик, намекаю. Вселенная не может иметь места, где что то равно ноль. Масса, Время Пространство, близко к ноль, да. Но ноль нет. все привязано к фундаментальной частице, из которой все и сложено. Она имеет собственную массу, собственное время И собственный размер и промежутков пространства. Для взаимодействия масс, как продолжение действия сил. Время и
      пространство бесплатное но обязательное приложение и неотъемлемо.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Collapsing Plasma May Hold the Key to Cosmic Magnetism

    This Breakthrough Solar Panel Generates Power From Both Sunlight and Raindrops

    Scientists Uncover New Metabolic Effects Beyond Weight Loss of Mounjaro

    Scientists Discover Cancer Tumors Are “Addicted” to This Common Antioxidant

    1,800 Miles Down: Scientists Uncover Mysterious Movements at the Edge of Earth’s Core

    Scientists Discover Hidden “Good Fats” in Green Rice That Could Transform Nutrition

    Your Child’s Clothes Could Contain Toxic Lead, Study Finds

    Researchers Break a 150-Year-Old Math Law With a Surprising Donut Discovery

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • The Mystery of the Notes: Why No One Knows How This 120-Year-Old Song Should Sound
    • Scientists Discover 132-Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Tracks on South Africa’s Coast
    • Scientists Uncover the Secret Ingredient Behind the Spark That May Have Started Life on Earth
    • Natural Oils vs. Antibiotics: The Swine Study That Could Change Farming
    • The Biggest Volcanic Event in Earth’s History Transformed an Entire Oceanic Plate
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.