Playing Quantum Billiards With Protons at the Large Hadron Collider

Quantum Proton Billiards

Protons accelerated almost to the speed of light can collide similarly to billiard balls. However, since protons are quantum particles, from measuring such collisions we can learn unobvious things about the strong interaction. Credit: IFJ PAN

A study conducted by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Accelerator has gained insights into the properties of strong interactions between protons at ultra-high energies by exploring elastic scattering in proton-proton collisions. The research found discrepancies with pre-existing theoretical models, prompting a reconsideration of current understanding of these interactions.

The quantum nature of interactions between elementary particles allows drawing non-trivial conclusions even from processes as simple as elastic scattering. The ATLAS experiment at the LHC accelerator reports the measurement of fundamental properties of strong interactions between protons at ultra-high energies.

The physics of billiard ball collisions is taught from early school years. In a good approximation, these collisions are elastic, where both momentum and energy are conserved. The scattering angle depends on how central the collision was (this is often quantified by the impact parameter value – the distance between the centers of the balls in a plane perpendicular to the motion). In the case of a small impact parameter, which corresponds to a highly central collision, the scattering angles are large. As the impact parameter increases, the scattering angle decreases.

In particle physics, we also deal with elastic collisions, when two particles collide, maintaining their identities, and scatter a certain angle to their original direction of motion. Here, we also have a relationship between the collision parameter and the scattering angle. By measuring the scattering angles, we gain information about the spatial structure of the colliding particles and the properties of their interactions.

European Physical Journal C Quantum Proton Billiards

Cover page of European Physical Journal C journal, Volume 83, Issue 5, May 2023, showing one of the main results of the published analysis – energy evolution of the total proton–proton cross section. Credit: EPJ C/Springer

Physicists from the Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, as part of the ATLAS Collaboration, performed a measurement of elastic scattering in proton–proton collisions at the LHC accelerator at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. Due to the extremely small scattering angles in such interactions (less than a thousandth of a degree), the measurements required the use of a dedicated measurement system. Its key element was a set of detectors placed over 200 meters from the collision point, but capable of measuring scattered protons at distances of just a few millimeters from the accelerator beam. This was made possible by the technique of so-called Roman pots, which allows placing of detectors inside the accelerator beam pipe and their close approach to the beam during data taking. An important contribution of the Krakow group was the work on the trigger and data acquisition system, without which no data can be recorded.

The second important component of the experimental setup was the special configuration of magnetic fields shaping the LHC accelerator beam. In typical measurements, the goal is to maximize beam focusing in order to increase the frequency of interesting interactions. However, tightly focused beams have a large angular divergence, making the measurement of elastic scattering practically impossible. The special magnet configuration minimizes this divergence and ensures precise measurements.

The direct result of the measurement, published in European Physical Journal C, is the distribution of the scattering angle, or more precisely – the distribution of the variable t, which is proportional to the square of that angle. Conclusions regarding the fundamental properties of nuclear strong interactions between protons at very high energies, were drawn from the shape of this distribution. The procedure of extracting this information is based on quantum properties of elastic scattering – effects that are not observed in the game of billiards.

The first of these properties is the so-called optical theorem, which is a consequence of probability conservation in quantum processes. It relates elastic interactions to inelastic ones (i.e. ones where additional particles are produced). Since the protons in the studied collisions have very high energy, inelastic processes occur frequently. The optical theorem allowed determining the value of a parameter called the total cross-section from measurements of only elastic interactions.

The cross-section is a quantity used in particle physics to describe the likelihood of a particular reaction. The total cross-section describes the chance of any type of proton–proton collision and is related to the proton size. The result published by the ATLAS Collaboration is the most precise measurement of this parameter at 13 TeV energy. The high precision was possible, among other factors, by the precise determination of the detector position, for which the IFJ PAN group was responsible. The obtained result confirms an important property of strong interactions – the increase of the total cross-section with increasing collision energy. This increase can be thought of as the proton size increasing with energy.

Having an accurate knowledge of the total cross-section is of interest not only for studying strong interactions themselves but also in other areas of particle physics. Strong interactions are relevant, for example, in the search for new physics in experiments at the LHC, where they act as background, as well as in cosmic ray research, where they are responsible for the development of cosmic air showers. Precise modeling of these processes is possible thanks to precise measurements of quantities such as the total cross-section.

In proton–proton collisions, elastic scattering can occur via two mechanisms: strong nuclear interaction and Coulomb interaction, i.e. the repulsion between electric charges. The second consequence of the quantum nature of the studied process is the interference between these mechanisms. The interference depends on their scattering amplitudes. The scattering amplitude is a measure of probability used in quantum physics. Unlike ordinary probability, its values are not real numbers but complex numbers. Therefore, it is described by either its magnitude and phase or by its real and imaginary parts. Since Coulomb interactions are well understood and their scattering amplitude can be calculated, by measuring the interference, we gain insights into both the real and imaginary parts of the nuclear amplitude.

The experimentally measured value of the ratio of the real to the imaginary parts of the nuclear amplitude turns out to be significantly lower than predictions of pre-LHC theoretical models. These models follow from certain assumptions about the properties of the strong interactions. The observed discrepancy challenges these assumptions.

The first assumption is that at very high energies properties of proton–antiproton collisions are the same as those of proton–proton and antiproton–antiproton collisions. This is because, although protons are made up of quarks and gluons, collisions at high energies only occur predominantly between gluons. Since the gluon structure of protons and antiprotons is the same, the natural assumption is that the interactions in different systems are identical. Allowing a difference, which is possible because of the quantum nature of interactions, makes the theoretical models describe the experimental data.

The second assumption of the theoretical models concerns the growth of the total cross-section with energy. It was assumed that its character for energies above those currently measured at the LHC accelerator is the same as observed so far. The observed discrepancy can be explained also by a slowing down of this growth at energies above the LHC energy.

Both considered hypotheses concern the basic properties of the strong interaction at high energies. Regardless of which one is true, the reported measurements shed light on our understanding of the fundamental interactions of particles.

Reference: “Measurement of the total cross section and ρ-parameter from elastic scattering in pp collisions at s√=13TeV with the ATLAS detector” by G. Aad, B. Abbott, D. C. Abbott, K. Abeling, S. H. Abidi, A. Aboulhorma, H. Abramowicz, H. Abreu, Y. Abulaiti, A. C. Abusleme Hoffman, B. S. Acharya, B. Achkar, C. Adam Bourdarios, L. Adamczyk, L. Adamek, S. V. Addepalli, J. Adelman, A. Adiguzel, S. Adorni, T. Adye, A. A. Affolder, Y. Afik, M. N. Agaras, J. Agarwala, A. Aggarwal, C. Agheorghiesei, J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, A. Ahmad, F. Ahmadov, W. S. Ahmed, S. Ahuja, X. Ai, G. Aielli, I. Aizenberg, M. Akbiyik, T. P. A. Åkesson, A. V. Akimov, K. Al Khoury, G. L. Alberghi, J. Albert, P. Albicocco, S. Alderweireldt, M. Aleksa, I. N. Aleksandrov, C. Alexa, T. Alexopoulos, A. Alfonsi, F. Alfonsi, M. Alhroob, B. Ali, S. Ali, M. Aliev, G. Alimonti, W. Alkakhi, C. Allaire, B. M. M. Allbrooke, P. P. Allport, A. Aloisio, F. Alonso, C. Alpigiani, E. Alunno Camelia, M. Alvarez Estevez, M. G. Alviggi, M. Aly, Y. Amaral Coutinho, A. Ambler, C. Amelung, C. G. Ames, D. Amidei, S. P. Amor Dos Santos, S. Amoroso, K. R. Amos, V. Ananiev, C. Anastopoulos, T. Andeen, J. K. Anders, S. Y. Andrean, A. Andreazza, S. Angelidakis, A. Angerami, A. V. Anisenkov, A. Annovi, C. Antel, M. T. Anthony, E. Antipov, M. Antonelli, D. J. A. Antrim, F. Anulli, M. Aoki, T. Aoki, J. A. Aparisi Pozo, M. A. Aparo, L. Aperio Bella, C. Appelt, N. Aranzabal, V. Araujo Ferraz, C. Arcangeletti, A. T. H. Arce, E. Arena, J-F. Arguin, S. Argyropoulos, J.-H. Arling, A. J. Armbruster, O. Arnaez, H. Arnold, Z. P. Arrubarrena Tame, G. Artoni, H. Asada, K. Asai, S. Asai, N. A. Asbah, J. Assahsah, K. Assamagan, R. Astalos, R. J. Atkin, M. Atkinson, N. B. Atlay, H. Atmani, P. A. Atmasiddha, K. Augsten, S. Auricchio, A. D. Auriol, V. A. Austrup, G. Avner, G. Avolio, K. Axiotis, M. K. Ayoub, G. Azuelos, D. Babal, H. Bachacou, K. Bachas, A. Bachiu, F. Backman, A. Badea, P. Bagnaia, M. Bahmani, A. J. Bailey, V. R. Bailey, J. T. Baines, C. Bakalis, O. K. Baker, P. J. Bakker, E. Bakos, D. Bakshi Gupta, S. Balaji, R. Balasubramanian, E. M. Baldin, P. Balek, E. Ballabene, F. Balli, L. M. Baltes, W. K. Balunas, J. Balz, E. Banas, M. Bandieramonte, A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Bansal, L. Barak, E. L. Barberio, D. Barberis, M. Barbero, G. Barbour, K. N. Barends, T. Barillari, M-S. Barisits, T. Barklow, R. M. Barnett, P. Baron, D. A. Baron Moreno, A. Baroncelli, G. Barone, A. J. Barr, L. Barranco Navarro, F. Barreiro, J. Barreiro Guimarães da Costa, U. Barron, M. G. Barros Teixeira, S. Barsov, F. Bartels, R. Bartoldus, A. E. Barton, P. Bartos, A. Basalaev, A. Basan, M. Baselga, I. Bashta, A. Bassalat, M. J. Basso, C. R. Basson, R. L. Bates, S. Batlamous, J. R. Batley, B. Batool, M. Battaglia, D. Battulga, M. Bauce, P. Bauer, A. Bayirli, J. B. Beacham, T. Beau, P. H. Beauchemin, F. Becherer, P. Bechtle, H. P. Beck, K. Becker, A. J. Beddall, V. A. Bednyakov, C. P. Bee, L. J. Beemster, T. A. Beermann, M. Begalli, M. Begel, A. Behera, J. K. Behr, C. Beirao Da Cruz E Silva, J. F. Beirer, F. Beisiegel, M. Belfkir, G. Bella, L. Bellagamba, A. Bellerive, P. Bellos, K. Beloborodov, K. Belotskiy, N. L. Belyaev, D. Benchekroun, F. Bendebba, Y. Benhammou, D. P. Benjamin, M. Benoit, J. R. Bensinger, S. Bentvelsen, L. Beresford, M. Beretta, D. Berge, E. Bergeaas Kuutmann, N. Berger, B. Bergmann, J. Beringer, S. Berlendis, G. Bernardi, C. Bernius, F. U. Bernlochner, T. Berry, P. Berta, A. Berthold, I. A. Bertram, S. Bethke, A. Betti, A. J. Bevan, M. Bhamjee, S. Bhatta, D. S. Bhattacharya, P. Bhattarai, V. S. Bhopatkar, R. Bi, R. M. Bianchi, O. Biebel, R. Bielski, M. Biglietti, T. R. V. Billoud, M. Bindi, A. Bingul, C. Bini, S. Biondi, A. Biondini, C. J. Birch-sykes, G. A. Bird, M. Birman, T. Bisanz, E. Bisceglie, D. Biswas, A. Bitadze, K. Bjørke, I. Bloch, C. Blocker, A. Blue, U. Blumenschein, J. Blumenthal, G. J. Bobbink, V. S. Bobrovnikov, M. Boehler, D. Bogavac, A. G. Bogdanchikov, C. Bohm, V. Boisvert, P. Bokan, T. Bold, M. Bomben, M. Bona, M. Boonekamp, C. D. Booth, A. G. Borbély, H. M. Borecka-Bielska, L. S. Borgna, G. Borissov, D. Bortoletto, D. Boscherini, M. Bosman, J. D. Bossio Sola, K. Bouaouda, J. Boudreau, E. V. Bouhova-Thacker, D. Boumediene, R. Bouquet, A. Boveia, J. Boyd, D. Boye, I. R. Boyko, J. Bracinik, N. Brahimi, G. Brandt, O. Brandt, F. Braren, B. Brau, J. E. Brau, K. Brendlinger, R. Brener, L. Brenner, R. Brenner, S. Bressler, B. Brickwedde, D. Britton, D. Britzger, I. Brock, G. Brooijmans, W. K. Brooks, E. Brost, T. L. Bruckler, P. A. Bruckman de Renstrom, B. Brüers, D. Bruncko, A. Bruni, G. Bruni, M. Bruschi, N. Bruscino, L. Bryngemark, T. Buanes, Q. Buat, P. Buchholz, A. G. Buckley, I. A. Budagov, M. K. Bugge, O. Bulekov, B. A. Bullard, S. Burdin, C. D. Burgard, A. M. Burger, B. Burghgrave, J. T. P. Burr, C. D. Burton, J. C. Burzynski, E. L. Busch, V. Büscher, P. J. Bussey, J. M. Butler, C. M. Buttar, J. M. Butterworth, W. Buttinger, C. J. Buxo Vazquez, A. R. Buzykaev, G. Cabras, S. Cabrera Urbán, D. Caforio, H. Cai, Y. Cai, V. M. M. Cairo, O. Cakir, N. Calace, P. Calafiura, G. Calderini, P. Calfayan, G. Callea, L. P. Caloba, D. Calvet, S. Calvet, T. P. Calvet, M. Calvetti, R. Camacho Toro, S. Camarda, D. Camarero Munoz, P. Camarri, M. T. Camerlingo, D. Cameron, C. Camincher, M. Campanelli, A. Camplani, V. Canale, A. Canesse, M. Cano Bret, J. Cantero, Y. Cao, F. Capocasa, M. Capua, A. Carbone, R. Cardarelli, J. C. J. Cardenas, F. Cardillo, T. Carli, G. Carlino, J. I. Carlotto, B. T. Carlson, E. M. Carlson, L. Carminati, M. Carnesale, S. Caron, E. Carquin, S. Carrá, G. Carratta, F. Carrio Argos, J. W. S. Carter, T. M. Carter, M. P. Casado, A. F. Casha, E. G. Castiglia, F. L. Castillo, L. Castillo Garcia, V. Castillo Gimenez, N. F. Castro, A. Catinaccio, J. R. Catmore, V. Cavaliere, N. Cavalli, V. Cavasinni, E. Celebi, F. Celli, M. S. Centonze, K. Cerny, A. S. Cerqueira, A. Cerri, L. Cerrito, F. Cerutti, A. Cervelli, S. A. Cetin, Z. Chadi, D. Chakraborty, M. Chala, J. Chan, W. Y. Chan, J. D. Chapman, B. Chargeishvili, D. G. Charlton, T. P. Charman, M. Chatterjee, S. Chekanov, S. V. Chekulaev, G. A. Chelkov, A. Chen, B. Chen, B. Chen, C. Chen, H. Chen, H. Chen, J. Chen, J. Chen, S. Chen, S. J. Chen, X. Chen, X. Chen, Y. Chen, C. L. Cheng, H. C. Cheng, A. Cheplakov, E. Cheremushkina, E. Cherepanova, R. Cherkaoui El Moursli, E. Cheu, K. Cheung, L. Chevalier, V. Chiarella, G. Chiarelli, N. Chiedde, G. Chiodini, A. S. Chisholm, A. Chitan, M. Chitishvili, Y. H. Chiu, M. V. Chizhov, K. Choi, A. R. Chomont, Y. Chou, E. Y. S. Chow, T. Chowdhury, L. D. Christopher, K. L. Chu, M. C. Chu, X. Chu, J. Chudoba, J. J. Chwastowski, D. Cieri, K. M. Ciesla, V. Cindro, A. Ciocio, F. Cirotto, Z. H. Citron, M. Citterio, D. A. Ciubotaru, B. M. Ciungu, A. Clark, P. J. Clark, J. M. Clavijo Columbie, S. E. Clawson, C. Clement, J. Clercx, L. Clissa, Y. Coadou, M. Cobal, A. Coccaro, R. F. Coelho Barrue, R. Coelho Lopes De Sa, S. Coelli, H. Cohen, A. E. C. Coimbra, B. Cole, J. Collot, P. Conde Muiño, M. P. Connell, S. H. Connell, I. A. Connelly, E. I. Conroy, F. Conventi, H. G. Cooke, A. M. Cooper-Sarkar, F. Cormier, L. D. Corpe, M. Corradi, E. E. Corrigan, F. Corriveau, A. Cortes-Gonzalez, M. J. Costa, F. Costanza, D. Costanzo, B. M. Cote, G. Cowan, J. W. Cowley, K. Cranmer, S. Crépé-Renaudin, F. Crescioli, M. Cristinziani, M. Cristoforetti, V. Croft, G. Crosetti, A. Cueto, T. Cuhadar Donszelmann, H. Cui, Z. Cui, A. R. Cukierman, W. R. Cunningham, F. Curcio, P. Czodrowski, M. M. Czurylo, M. J. Da Cunha Sargedas De Sousa, J. V. Da Fonseca Pinto, C. Da Via, W. Dabrowski, T. Dado, S. Dahbi, T. Dai, C. Dallapiccola, M. Dam, G. D’amen, V. D’Amico, J. Damp, J. R. Dandoy, M. F. Daneri, M. Danninger, V. Dao, G. Darbo, S. Darmora, S. J. Das, S. D’Auria, C. David, T. Davidek, D. R. Davis, B. Davis-Purcell, I. Dawson, K. De, R. De Asmundis, M. De Beurs, N. De Biase, S. De Castro, N. De Groot, P. de Jong, H. De la Torre, A. De Maria, A. De Salvo, U. De Sanctis, A. De Santo, J. B. De Vivie De Regie, D. V. Dedovich, J. Degens, A. M. Deiana, F. Del Corso, J. Del Peso, F. Del Rio, F. Deliot, C. M. Delitzsch, M. Della Pietra, D. Della Volpe, A. Dell’Acqua, L. Dell’Asta, M. Delmastro, P. A. Delsart, S. Demers, M. Demichev, S. P. Denisov, L. D’Eramo, D. Derendarz, F. Derue, P. Dervan, K. Desch, K. Dette, C. Deutsch, P. O. Deviveiros, F. A. Di Bello, A. Di Ciaccio, L. Di Ciaccio, A. Di Domenico, C. Di Donato, A. Di Girolamo, G. Di Gregorio, A. Di Luca, B. Di Micco, R. Di Nardo, C. Diaconu, F. A. Dias, T. Dias Do Vale, M. A. Diaz, F. G. Diaz Capriles, M. Didenko, E. B. Diehl, L. Diehl, S. Díez Cornell, C. Diez Pardos, C. Dimitriadi, A. Dimitrievska, W. Ding, J. Dingfelder, I-M. Dinu, S. J. Dittmeier, F. Dittus, F. Djama, T. Djobava, J. I. Djuvsland, C. Doglioni, J. Dolejsi, Z. Dolezal, M. Donadelli, B. Dong, J. Donini, A. D’Onofrio, M. D’Onofrio, J. Dopke, A. Doria, M. T. Dova, A. T. Doyle, M. A. Draguet, E. Drechsler, E. Dreyer, I. Drivas-koulouris, A. S. Drobac, M. Drozdova, D. Du, T. A. du Pree, F. Dubinin, M. Dubovsky, E. Duchovni, G. Duckeck, O. A. Ducu, D. Duda, A. Dudarev, M. D’uffizi, L. Duflot, M. Dührssen, C. Dülsen, A. E. Dumitriu, M. Dunford, S. Dungs, K. Dunne, A. Duperrin, H. Duran Yildiz, M. Düren, A. Durglishvili, B. L. Dwyer, G. I. Dyckes, M. Dyndal, S. Dysch, B. S. Dziedzic, Z. O. Earnshaw, B. Eckerova, M. G. Eggleston, E. Egidio Purcino De Souza, L. F. Ehrke, G. Eigen, K. Einsweiler, T. Ekelof, P. A. Ekman, Y. El Ghazali, H. El Jarrari, A. El Moussaouy, V. Ellajosyula, M. Ellert, F. Ellinghaus, A. A. Elliot, N. Ellis, J. Elmsheuser, M. Elsing, D. Emeliyanov, A. Emerman, Y. Enari, I. Ene, S. Epari, J. Erdmann, A. Ereditato, P. A. Erland, M. Errenst, M. Escalier, C. Escobar, E. Etzion, G. Evans, H. Evans, M. O. Evans, A. Ezhilov, S. Ezzarqtouni, F. Fabbri, L. Fabbri, G. Facini, V. Fadeyev, R. M. Fakhrutdinov, S. Falciano, P. J. Falke, S. Falke, … , M. Zaazoua, B. Zabinski, E. Zaid, T. Zakareishvili, N. Zakharchuk, S. Zambito, J. A. Zamora Saa, J. Zang, D. Zanzi, O. Zaplatilek, S. V. Zeißner, C. Zeitnitz, J. C. Zeng, D. T. Zenger Jr, O. Zenin, T. Ženiš, S. Zenz, S. Zerradi, D. Zerwas, B. Zhang, D. F. Zhang, G. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Zhang, K. Zhang, L. Zhang, P. Zhang, R. Zhang, S. Zhang, T. Zhang, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhang, H. Zhao, P. Zhao, T. Zhao, Y. Zhao, Z. Zhao, A. Zhemchugov, X. Zheng, Z. Zheng, D. Zhong, B. Zhou, C. Zhou, H. Zhou, N. Zhou, Y. Zhou, C. G. Zhu, C. Zhu, H. L. Zhu, H. Zhu, J. Zhu, Y. Zhu, Y. Zhu, X. Zhuang, K. Zhukov, V. Zhulanov, N. I. Zimine, J. Zinsser, M. Ziolkowski, L. Živković, A. Zoccoli, K. Zoch, T. G. Zorbas, O. Zormpa, W. Zou, L. Zwalinski & ATLAS Collaboration, 26 May 2023, The European Physical Journal C.
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11436-8

At present, the detectors used in the described studies are being prepared for further measurements of elastic scattering at even higher energies. The Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences is also conducting research on other processes in which both strong and electromagnetic interactions play significant roles. The technique of Roman pots plays a crucial role in these studies (NCN grant SONATA BIS 2021/42/E/ST2/00350).

4 Comments on "Playing Quantum Billiards With Protons at the Large Hadron Collider"

  1. Bao-hua ZHANG | July 14, 2023 at 4:56 pm | Reply

    By measuring the interference, we gain insights into both the real and imaginary parts of the nuclear amplitude. The real and imaginary parts are very important. Obviously, measurement alone cannot be relied on.

  2. @bao-hua
    What are you even trying to say? Measurements are the only thing we can actually rely on. Measurements happen in this universe, theory happens in the universes of our minds.

    • Bao-hua ZHANG | July 14, 2023 at 10:07 pm | Reply

      You are right. Scientific research cannot rely solely on measurement. The correct and scientific theoretical guidance is also important. The reason why human-kinds are great is because they are good at guiding practice with theory and summarizing new theories in practice. Both are indispensable.
      Best wishes for you.

  3. Patrick Donohue | July 14, 2023 at 9:54 pm | Reply

    1st there is imagination, followed by theory which gives rise to experiment & measurements which are tempered by an educated guess of the probability of the measurement.

    There are no ‘hard’ measurements, just approximations.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.