Using satellite measurements, researchers and a team of international collaborators are developing new methods to quantify ocean acidity around the globe.
With fundamental changes happening to the chemistry of the world’s oceans, salinity information from ESA’s SMOS mission is being used with other Earth observation data to obtain information on ‘the other carbon dioxide problem’ – ocean acidification.
This new step is set to advance the way ocean biologists and climatologists study the oceans.
More than a quarter of the carbon dioxide we release into the atmosphere every year is soaked up by the oceans.
Initially, this may appear to be a good thing, tempering global warming, but there is a downside.
As more carbon dioxide dissolves into the oceans, the more acidic the seawater becomes – with extremely damaging effects.
Over the next century, ocean acidification has the potential to alter many marine ecosystems so that sea life is affected as well as fisheries – a basic food source on which many rely.
Carefully assessing changes in ocean acidity is essential, particularly because these changes are not uniform around the world.
Until now, this information has only been available from measurements taken from research vessels and laboratory experiments, which is clearly limited.
Researchers at the University of Exeter, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Ifremer, ESA, and a team of international collaborators are developing new methods that allow ocean acidity around the globe to be quantified using satellite measurements.
Piecing together salinity data from SMOS with satellite sea-surface temperature measurements and additional auxiliary data, it is possible to work out the pH of seawater and therefore provide accurate information to help address the growing problem of ocean acidification.
Roberto Sabia, Earth observation data engineer at ESA, explains, “By unifying various different efforts, for the first time we are now able to use satellites to systematically determine the pH of surface seawater.
“In particular, by capitalizing on salinity measurements from SMOS, we aim to routinely generate a novel value-added data product: a global surface ocean pH atlas.”
Jamie Shutler from the University of Exeter, who is leading the research, added, “Satellites are likely to become increasingly important for monitoring ocean acidification, especially in remote waters.
“We are pioneering this data fusion approach so that we can observe large areas of Earth’s oceans, allowing us to quickly and easily identify those areas most at risk from the increasing acidification.”
This research, which is being carried out through ESA’s Earth Observation Support to Science Element (STSE), was published today in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.
Lead author Peter Land, from Plymouth Marine Laboratory, said, “It is now time to evaluate how to make the most of satellite and in situ data to help us understand ocean acidification, and to establish where remotely-sensed data can make the best contribution.”
Reference: “Salinity from Space Unlocks Satellite-Based Assessment of Ocean Acidification” by Peter E. Land, Jamie D. Shutler, Helen S. Findlay, Fanny Girard-Ardhuin, Roberto Sabia, Nicolas Reul, Jean-Francois Piolle, Bertrand Chapron, Yves Quilfen, Joseph Salisbury, Douglas Vandemark, Richard Bellerby and Punyasloke Bhadury, 8 January 2015, Environmental Science & Technology.
DOI: 10.1021/es504849s
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
1 Comment
“… the more acidic the seawater becomes …”
You cannot have “more” of something that does not exist. The oceans are not acidic, therefore, they cannot become “more” acidic. Interestingly, the caption for the lead illustration — “Temperature and salinity measurements … have been used to map ocean alkalinity, …” — gets it right. Unfortunately, the rest of the text does little for grammatical correctness because political correctness is given priority.
How would you react if you were to read “Forest fires in Antarctica could get more severe and more frequent in the future.”? You might conclude that the sentence had been written by a high school dropout.