Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Technology»Scientists Just Built a CO2-Eating Machine That Runs on Sunlight
    Technology

    Scientists Just Built a CO2-Eating Machine That Runs on Sunlight

    By University of CambridgeFebruary 13, 202543 Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Solar Powered Device Captures Carbon Dioxide to Make Fuel
    Researchers have developed a reactor that pulls carbon dioxide directly from the air and converts it into sustainable fuel, using sunlight as the power source. Credit: University of Cambridge

    Scientists have developed a sunlight-powered reactor that directly captures CO2 from the air and transforms it into sustainable fuel.

    Unlike traditional carbon capture methods, this device requires no fossil-fuel energy, making it a game-changer for the climate crisis. By mimicking photosynthesis, it produces syngas, a crucial ingredient in fuel and pharmaceuticals, with plans to scale up for liquid fuel production.

    Harnessing Sunlight for Sustainable Fuel

    Scientists at the University of Cambridge have developed a solar-powered reactor that captures carbon dioxide directly from the air and converts it into sustainable fuel using sunlight.

    This innovative reactor has the potential to produce fuel for cars and planes, as well as essential chemicals and pharmaceuticals. It could also provide a reliable energy source in remote or off-grid locations.

    Unlike traditional carbon capture technologies, which require fossil fuel energy and involve transporting and storing CO2, this reactor eliminates those steps. Instead, it directly converts atmospheric CO2 into useful products using only sunlight. The research findings were published today (February 13) in Nature Energy.

    The Limitations of Conventional Carbon Storage

    While Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) has been promoted as a solution to the climate crisis—receiving £22 billion (~$27 billion) in UK government funding—it remains highly energy-intensive. Additionally, concerns persist over the long-term safety of storing pressurized CO2 deep underground, though ongoing studies are assessing these risks.

    “Aside from the expense and the energy intensity, CCS provides an excuse to carry on burning fossil fuels, which is what caused the climate crisis in the first place,” said Professor Erwin Reisner, who led the research. “CCS is also a non-circular process, since the pressurized CO2 is, at best, stored underground indefinitely, where it’s of no use to anyone.”

    Turning a Harmful Gas into Useful Chemicals

    “What if instead of pumping the carbon dioxide underground, we made something useful from it?” said first author Dr Sayan Kar from Cambridge’s Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry. “CO2 is a harmful greenhouse gas, but it can also be turned into useful chemicals without contributing to global warming.”

    The focus of Reisner’s research group is the development of devices that convert waste, water, and air into practical fuels and chemicals. These devices take their inspiration from photosynthesis: the process by which plants convert sunlight into food. The devices don’t use any outside power: no cables, no batteries – all they need is the power of the sun.

    From Air to Syngas: The Key Breakthrough

    The team’s newest system takes CO2 directly from the air and converts it into syngas: a key intermediate in the production of many chemicals and pharmaceuticals. The researchers say their approach, which does not require any transportation or storage, is much easier to scale up than earlier solar-powered devices.

    The device, a solar-powered flow reactor, uses specialized filters to grab CO2 from the air at night, like how a sponge soaks up water. When the sun comes out, the sunlight heats up the captured CO2, absorbing infrared radiation and a semiconductor powder absorbs the ultraviolet radiation to start a chemical reaction that converts the captured CO2 into solar syngas. A mirror on the reactor concentrates the sunlight, making the process more efficient.

    Towards Liquid Fuels and Scaled-Up Solutions

    The researchers are currently working on converting solar syngas into liquid fuels, which could be used to power cars, planes, and more – without adding more CO2 to the atmosphere.

    “If we made these devices at scale, they could solve two problems at once: removing CO2 from the atmosphere and creating a clean alternative to fossil fuels,” said Kar. “CO2 is seen as a harmful waste product, but it is also an opportunity.”

    A Future Without Fossil Fuels?

    The researchers say that a particularly promising opportunity is in the chemical and pharmaceutical sector, where syngas can be converted into many of the products we rely on every day, without contributing to climate change. They are building a larger scale version of the reactor and hope to begin tests in the spring.

    If scaled up, the researchers say their reactor could be used in a decentralized way, so that individuals could theoretically generate their own fuel, which would be useful in remote or off-grid locations.

    “Instead of continuing to dig up and burn fossil fuels to produce the products we have come to rely on, we can get all the CO2 we need directly from the air and reuse it,” said Reisner. “We can build a circular, sustainable economy – if we have the political will to do it.”

    Reference: “Direct air capture of CO2 for solar fuel production in flow” by Sayan Kar, Dongseok Kim, Ariffin Bin Mohamad Annuar, Bidyut Bikash Sarma, Michael Stanton, Erwin Lam, Subhajit Bhattacharjee, Suvendu Karak, Heather F. Greer and Erwin Reisner, 13 February 2025, Nature Energy.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41560-025-01714-y

    The technology is being commercialized with the support of Cambridge Enterprise, the University’s commercialization arm. The research was supported in part by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), the European Research Council, the Royal Academy of Engineering, and the Cambridge Trust. Erwin Reisner is a Fellow of St John’s College, Cambridge.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Carbon Capture Fuel Popular Solar Energy Solar Fuels University of Cambridge
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Revolutionary Artificial Leaf Turns CO2 Into Valuable Fuels and Chemicals

    Revolutionary Solar-Powered Device Transforms Polluted Water Into Clean Hydrogen Fuel & Purified Water

    Solar-Powered Reactor Converts CO2 and Plastic Waste Into Sustainable Fuels

    Solar Powered “Artificial Leaf” Produces Clean, Car-Ready Liquid Fuels From Sunlight

    New Low-Cost Battery-Like Device Captures CO2 Emissions While It Charges

    3D-Printed “Nano-Skyscrapers” Help Bacteria Convert Sunlight Into Electricity

    Game-Changing Carbon Capture Technology To Remove 99% of CO2 From Air

    Mystery of High Performing Novel Solar Cells Revealed in Stunning Clarity

    Researchers Develop a Computational Tool for Identifying Carbon Capture Technologies

    43 Comments

    1. Bill Bailey on February 13, 2025 3:40 am

      You people do realize that plants need CO2 and we need the plants or?

      Reply
      • Phillip on February 13, 2025 3:02 pm

        I think that is understood. We just to lower it to a balanced amount so we don’t burn up as well.

        Reply
        • Boba on February 13, 2025 3:35 pm

          Do you understand that CO2 is a symptom of warming, not a cause?

          Reply
          • sapien on February 13, 2025 5:38 pm

            WTF? It is absolutely the cause. Read a science book, get an education. CO2 absorbs infrared light which is radiated outward towards space by everything that is heated up during the day by the sun. The higher the CO2 concentration, the more heat is absorbed. Do an experiment, put air into one two liter clear plastic bottle and in another one add some CO2. Then shine a heat lamp at both of them and see which one gets hotter. Elementary science.

            Reply
          • Ows on February 14, 2025 4:52 am

            Please post a study which says co2 isn’t a heat trapping gas

            Reply
            • Boba on February 14, 2025 7:12 am

              In a greenhouse, it’s the glass celing that’s trapping the heat, not the CO2. In the atmosphere it’s the clouds – again: not the CO2.

            • huls on February 21, 2025 1:06 am

              CO2 is a mild greenhouse gas with a logarithmic effect . At the current concentration it is at it’s max. A doubling of CO2 will have no noticable effect.

              https://co2coalition.org/publications/van-wijngaarden-and-happer-radiative-transfer-paper-for-five-greenhouse-gases-explained/

          • Jesse on February 14, 2025 2:01 pm

            Wow, just wow. I have no words for this

            Reply
            • Bob on February 15, 2025 7:03 am

              Ah bless your little head boba. 😂

          • Bert on February 15, 2025 3:59 am

            Co2 is a greenhouse gas that is like a blanket around the earth. More co2 = a thicker blanket. Burning carbon in the form of fossil fuels, over the past 150 years or so, has increased the co2 blanket by 50%. This is elementary physics.
            Co2 is most definitely the main cause of the warming, and also, to a lesser extent methane, which is released from gas mining and other causes.

            Reply
            • Lost Souls Make Lousy Leaders on February 16, 2025 10:10 am

              CO2 is approximately .04 of 1% of the atmosphere. That is .0004% of the total atmospheric content on the earth. Plant life dies at a content lower than .0002%. Subtract what trillions of plants/trees consume in producing oxygen and make the case that what is left has any potential to warm the planet.

              Underwater volcanos are probably warming the oceans more than anything else. The earth is just getting worn out as mentioned in Isiah 24.

        • BlueCat57 on February 13, 2025 4:20 pm

          God created a wide variety of such machines. They are called flora.

          Reply
          • John Smith on February 13, 2025 11:46 pm

            Figments of our imagination can only create paranoia.

            Reply
        • Tom Dailey on February 14, 2025 9:08 am

          Hmmm, they call thos process new? They’re called PLANTS, aren’t they? You know… photosynthesis!

          Reply
          • Nope on February 24, 2025 7:37 am

            The oceans are responsible for absorbing most of the CO2. TOO much will acidify our oceans and shut down the AMOC. It already happened once before…. It’s called the great dying… A massive amount of CO2 was released into the atmosphere in a very short amount of time… Almost sterilized the planet… We have evidence of it too… In the rocks… Of course ppl like you don’t believe in it… Why would you. You won’t live to see the damage… You won’t even live a million hours…. You’d have to live to be 120 to say you’ve lived a million hours .. 8,736 hours in a year… I guarantee you if you leave your oven door open for a million hours you’re house will be a few degrees warmer…. Again ppl like you won’t believe in proven science…. But a mythical creature in the sky ( THAT DOESN’T EXIST ) y’all will jump on…. Sadly the ONLY way to save our species & planet is to have the older stupid generation/ people to die so our world can truly be great again

            Reply
      • John Smith on February 13, 2025 11:48 pm

        So where does the H2 come from to complement the even more harmful CO this invention is producing? What does it do with the excess oxygen this process generates? What scarce noble metals are used as catalyst?

        Reply
    2. vcragain on February 13, 2025 6:26 am

      So many new tech solutions that just possibly we can save ourselves – the main problem being the vested interests who are very good at squashing anything that threatens their own business interests !!!

      Reply
      • Guy Smith on February 13, 2025 8:44 am

        Very creative and just in time. As soon as prototypes prove everything works as predicted, every nation can start building and deploying them. Having lots of sunlight will be important.

        Reply
        • JimBob on February 13, 2025 7:36 pm

          There is no “climate crisis”. It’s a natural phenomenon and playing god will hurt humanity much more than “help” the climate.

          Reply
          • Alan Rigney on February 14, 2025 3:48 am

            Trees need CO2 to survive.. They are the world’s mechanism to use CO2 and exchange it for Oxygen. The reason more CO2 exists is because we are cutting down Forrest after Forrest after Forrest and not replacing the trees. Also plants use CO2 though not on the scale that trees do and with all of the land being used. For building and roads then fewer plants and green is the result. This causes all of the weather phenomenon that we see around the globe from droughts here in the USA to floods elsewhere to increased hurricanes etc. Do the research, stop listening to all of the fake science and actually do the research from prior to the 1980’s about the benefits of rain Forrest’s and plants.

            Reply
          • Ows on February 14, 2025 4:49 am

            Sure thing Jim. Please let me know the last time the planet heated at such a rate

            Reply
          • Jesse on February 14, 2025 2:24 pm

            The lengths the mind will go to to convince itself of something it wants to believe is truly a marvel.

            You ignore 8 billion people burning and consuming and destroying the nature that God put here and you act like anything we do to counter that destruction and disdain as “playing god”. Insane. Absolutely insane

            Reply
          • Dubri on February 15, 2025 12:57 am

            Pollution created by humans is not a natural phenomenon. Humanity has been ‘playing god’ for a very long time by meddling with the natural balance.

            Reply
        • Sam Smith on February 19, 2025 1:59 am

          Why would you want to use more resources and cause more polution that continue to cause the problems you believe are happening? Just plant more trees and convert to regenerative farming it’s alot cheaper costs less consumes less resources and reverses the issue and buffers an unstable climate. The earth already has a system in place. They are called forests

          Reply
      • Sam Smith on February 19, 2025 1:54 am

        A CO2-Eating Machine That Runs on Sunlight? Yeah it’s called a tree… if you recall the earth is designed to have lots of them?

        Idiots…

        Reply
    3. Charlie Knapper on February 13, 2025 7:34 am

      Congratulations. You invented a plant.

      Reply
      • BlueCat57 on February 13, 2025 4:20 pm

        GMTA

        Reply
        • Brian MacMathuna on February 13, 2025 6:17 pm

          Yup. Highly technical of them.

          Reply
      • Jesse on February 14, 2025 2:07 pm

        Plants create syngas? Wow do you think they know?

        Reply
    4. Seth Friedman on February 13, 2025 8:15 am

      Climate Change and Global Warming are both FAKE ! Carbon is an integral part of photosynthesis. Here is the proof: CVHOAX.COM

      Reply
    5. Cat Guy on February 13, 2025 2:19 pm

      So they created a tree? A more expensive tree than a natural one that’s free?

      Reply
      • BlueCat57 on February 13, 2025 4:21 pm

        How else can they spend billions in USAID grants?

        Reply
        • Jesse on February 14, 2025 2:26 pm

          That’s not what USAID gives money to and the fact you think that shows how little you know. Tell me, are you allowed to think a thought if Trump or Musk didn’t tell you to think it? Oh wait, that’s a logical conundrum. Godspeed you maniac.

          Reply
      • John on February 13, 2025 7:04 pm

        No the point is a far more efficient tree. Solar energy to usable fuel.

        If it’s not efficient at enough, it doesn’t solve anything.

        Reply
        • Bert on February 15, 2025 4:09 am

          Obviously, if you capture co2, turn it into a fuel and then burn that fuel, you haven’t actually removed it from the atmosphere. You have to sequester it somehow to remove it.
          Nature did a great job of sequestering co2 millions of years ago by burying vast forests deep in the ground, giving the earth the pleasant climate it has experienced for a long period. Unfortunately, we’ve dug up a lot of it burned it and put it back in the atmosphere.

          Reply
    6. sapien on February 13, 2025 5:45 pm

      We have 3341 gigatons of CO2 in the atmosphere, 500 gigatons need to be removed. Imagine all the infrastructure in the world created to pump and move oil, gas and coal and then imagine creating double that capacity to remove CO2, because that is what you get when you burn those fossil fuels.

      Reply
    7. John on February 13, 2025 7:06 pm

      If it is efficient enough that’s great. It doesn’t hurt anything. And it’s making use of an invisible river of carbon all around us. Just like stills can pull portable water from the air.

      Reply
    8. Marko on February 14, 2025 6:12 am

      You have trees for that, and it is 1000x prettier. Ah no we don’t have them because we are cutting them down ahahaha 😀

      Reply
    9. Robert on February 14, 2025 8:51 am

      You guys (the imbecilic fooled ones) are imbeciles. How do you like that – does that give a warm and snuggly feeling? – CO2 was 0.2% for all of earth’s history until a relatively short time ago. That’s why we had forest and jungles all over the world and that’s why we have the balance of breathable gasses in the atmosphere. The Sahara was lush with waterfalls and rainbows. It has fallen to 0.04% and deserts abound. Vast areas are dried up wastelands.
      if CO2 drops in half to 0.02% ALL PLANT LIFE WILL DIE.
      Ok? Do you get that. I know you are clinging to the very first thing you heard and are invested emotionally in demanding what you’ve been told – but go look at who is doing the telling – and it is an army of writers and bots pumping it out “institutions” – try to contact these people – they are paid to keep the BS flowing. They have a financial incentive. Check them out – see what you’ve been fooled by.

      Reply
      • Jesse on February 14, 2025 2:16 pm

        Financial incentives you say? Fossil fuels are worth trillions of dollars a year. If you’re saying the pittance of grant money for climate study is more of a reason to doubt than trillions of dollars your head is so far up your *** you can see out of your own mouth.

        Reply
        • Robert on February 16, 2025 10:54 am

          I was referring to the reasons why these writers are propagandizing the ignorant. Cutting CO2 for plant-life is exactly analogous to cutting Oxygen from mammals. I guess you didn’t read the above.
          The energy needed to run the world costs money – what, do you think truth is just who lies louder? Is it all what others say? – Stand back, and realize, the earth went hundreds of millions of years at ten times the present atmospheric CO2. Then in a scant million years it slowly has dropped.
          We are right at losing all life on earth from CO2 starvation – and you’ve been so blinded by publications telling you the sky is falling, you make dribble comments like these? –
          I’m slapping your face – so it will snap you out of the ‘stupid-well’ that has befallen you.
          There’s a medieval children’s story – a woman goes into the kitchen and sees a hatchet stuck into the roof beam and imagines it will fall and kill someone, she becomes upset and cries. The next gal comes in but doesn’t need to think, the story takes her mind and she sits and cries. Two more do the same. The young squire arrives and asks why they are crying, they tell him and he pulls the hatchet out, saying, “You mean this?” and sets it down. They were carried away by the story
          People get taken by what they hear. Here’s one of mine: ” Close your ears and open your eyes.” The whole thing is right in front you.

          Reply
          • Nope on February 24, 2025 7:42 am

            The oceans are responsible for absorbing most of the CO2. TOO much will acidify our oceans and shut down the AMOC. It already happened once before…. It’s called the great dying… A massive amount of CO2 was released into the atmosphere in a very short amount of time… Almost sterilized the planet… We have evidence of it too… In the rocks… Of course ppl like you don’t believe in it… Why would you. You won’t live to see the damage… You won’t even live a million hours…. You’d have to live to be 120 to say you’ve lived a million hours .. 8,736 hours in a year… I guarantee you if you leave your oven door open for a million hours you’re house will be a few degrees warmer…. Again ppl like you won’t believe in proven science…. But a mythical creature in the sky ( THAT DOESN’T EXIST ) y’all will jump on…. Sadly the ONLY way to save our species & planet is to have the older stupid generation/ people to die so our world can truly be great again

            Reply
    10. HOPE on February 15, 2025 1:57 am

      Never normally do this. Can I congratulate the scientists. A truly wonderful inspired work. Let’s see where it goes.
      To those who criticise and seek to be little this.
      For those who follow a religion. Pray.
      For those who critics who do it to feel important, my word your special. Your important enough to be told what is being worked on.
      For me I look forward to reading about future work.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Why Popular Diabetes Drugs Like Ozempic Don’t Work for Everyone: The “Genetic Glitch”

    Scientists Stunned After Finding Plant Thought Extinct for 60 Years

    Scientists Discover Tiny New Spider That Hunts Prey 6x Its Size

    Natural Component From Licorice Shows Promise for Treating Inflammatory Bowel Disease

    Scientists Warn: Popular Sweetener Linked to Dangerous Metabolic Effects

    Monster Storms on Jupiter Unleash Lightning Beyond Anything on Earth

    Scientists Create “Liquid Gears” That Spin Without Touching

    The Simple Habit That Could Help Prevent Cancer

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • 100,000-Year-Old Neanderthal Fossils in Poland Reveal Unexpected Genetic Connections
    • Unexpected Hormone Discovery Could Change How We Treat Arthritis
    • Scientists Supercharge “Natural Killer” Cells To Break Through Cancer’s Defenses
    • Simple “Gut Reset” May Prevent Weight Gain After Ozempic or Wegovy
    • 2.8 Days to Disaster: Scientists Warn Low Earth Orbit Could Suddenly Collapse
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.