Superconducting Nanowires: A Quantum Breakthrough in Protein Ion Detection

Counting Single Proteins With Superconducting Nanowire

Counting single proteins with a superconducting nanowire. The background and nanowire are altered in Photoshop with the Generative Fill AI. (Human Insulin PDB:3I40). Credit: Quantum Nanophysics University of Vienna

Detection efficiency is 1,000 times higher than conventional ion detectors due to high sensitivity.

An international research team led by quantum physicist Markus Arndt (University of Vienna) has achieved a breakthrough in the detection of protein ions: Due to their high energy sensitivity, superconducting nanowire detectors achieve almost 100% quantum efficiency and exceed the detection efficiency of conventional ion detectors at low energies by a factor of up to a 1,000. In contrast to conventional detectors, they can also distinguish macromolecules by their impact energy. This allows for more sensitive detection of proteins and it provides additional information in mass spectrometry. The results of this study were recently published in the journal Science Advances.

Advancements in Mass Spectrometry

The detection, identification, and analysis of macromolecules is interesting in many areas of life sciences, including protein research, diagnostics, and analytics. Mass spectrometry is often used as a detection system – a method that typically separates charged particles (ions) according to their mass-to-charge ratio and measures the intensity of the signals generated by a detector. This provides information about the relative abundance of the different types of ions and therefore the composition of the sample. However, conventional detectors have only been able to achieve high detection efficiency and spatial resolution for particles with high-impact energy – a limitation that has now been overcome by an international team of researchers using superconducting nanowire detectors.

Innovative Use of Superconductivity

In the current study, a European consortium coordinated by the University of Vienna, with partners in Delft (Single Quantum), Lausanne (EPFL), Almere (MSVision), and Basel (University), demonstrates for the first time the use of superconducting nanowires as excellent detectors for protein beams in so-called quadrupole mass spectrometry. Ions from the sample to be analyzed are fed into a quadrupole mass spectrometer where they are filtered.

“If we now use superconducting nanowires instead of conventional detectors, we can even identify particles that hit the detector with low kinetic energy,” explains project leader Markus Arndt from the Quantum Nanophysics Group at the Faculty of Physics at the University of Vienna. This is made possible by a special material property (superconductivity) of the nanowire detectors.

SuperMaMa Laboratory University of Vienna

View of the SuperMaMa laboratory at the University of Vienna. The hanging gold-plated insert is the radiation shield behind which the superconducting nanowire detectors are installed.[1] Credit: Quantum Nanophysics University of Vienna

The key to this detection method is that nanowires enter a superconducting state at very low temperatures, in which they lose their electrical resistance and allow lossless current flow. Excitation of the superconducting nanowires by incoming ions causes a return to the normal conducting state (quantum transition). The change in the electrical properties of the nanowires during this transition is interpreted as a detection signal.

“With the nanowire detectors we use,” says first author Marcel Strauß, “we exploit the quantum transition from the superconducting to the normal conducting state and can thus outperform conventional ion detectors by up to three orders of magnitude.”

Indeed, nanowire detectors have a remarkable quantum yield at exceptionally low impact energies – and redefine the possibilities of conventional detectors.

“In addition, a mass spectrometer adapted with such a quantum sensor can not only distinguish molecules according to their mass to charge state, but also classify them according to their kinetic energy. This improves the detection and offers the possibility for having better spatial resolution,” says Marcel Strauß.

Nanowire detectors can find new applications in mass spectrometry, molecular spectroscopy, molecular deflectometry, or quantum interferometry of molecules, where high efficiency and good resolution are required, especially at low-impact energy.

Collaborative Effort and Funding

Single Quantum is leading the research on superconducting nanowire detectors, the experts from EPFL-Lausanne provide the ultracold electronics, MSVISION is a specialist in mass spectrometry, and the experts from the University of Basel are responsible for chemical synthesis and protein functionalization. The University of Vienna brings together all the components with its expertise in quantum optics, molecular beams, and superconductivity.

The work was funded by the European Commission as part of the SuperMaMa project (860713), which is dedicated to research into superconducting detectors for mass spectrometry and molecular analysis. Funding from the Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation (10771) contributed to the analysis of the modified proteins.

Note

  1. More about the SuperMaMa laboratory figure: View of the SuperMaMa laboratory at the University of Vienna. In the foreground: the adapted tandem mass spectrometer. On the optical table in front: the ultra-high vacuum chamber with 3.7 Kelvin cryocooler. The hanging gold-plated insert is the radiation shield behind which the superconducting nanowire detectors are installed. When closed, the proteins are focused onto the detector via ring electrodes through the few millimeter hole in the gold-plated shielding. In the background: Pulsed high-power laser for the photocleavage of labeled proteins with visible and ultraviolet light.

Reference: “Highly sensitive single-molecule detection of macromolecule ion beams” by Marcel Strauß, Armin Shayeghi, Martin F. X. Mauser, Philipp Geyer, Tim Kostersitz, Julia Salapa, Olexandr Dobrovolskiy, Steven Daly, Jan Commandeur, Yong Hua, Valentin Köhler, Marcel Mayor, Jad Benserhir, Claudio Bruschini, Edoardo Charbon, Mario Castaneda, Monique Gevers, Ronan Gourgues, Nima Kalhor, Andreas Fognini and Markus Arndt, 1 December 2023, Science Advances.
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj2801

4 Comments on "Superconducting Nanowires: A Quantum Breakthrough in Protein Ion Detection"

  1. Physics has been studying topics related to quantum. Does modern physics truly understand the physical essence of quantum?
    The physical essence of quantum is the spin of topological vortex. Spin generates gravitation. Spin generates energy. Spin generates evolution. The spin of topological vortices dominates the evolution of Everythings.
    The so-called academic journals (such as Physical Review Letters, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature, Science, etc.) adhere to pseudoscientific ideas and are stubborn.
    If you don’t want to be fooled by their pseudoscientific ideas, you can browse the comments of https://scitechdaily.com/microscope-spacecrafts-most-precise-test-of-key-component-of-the-theory-of-general-relativity/ or https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/595280873.
    I hope more people dare to stand up and fight against rampant pseudoscience.
    Wishing you all the best.

    • Charles G. Shaver | December 13, 2023 at 5:05 am | Reply

      As described, there does appear to be a significant breakthrough in protein ion sensing, albeit labeling it “quantum” may be a misnomer for “magnitudinal” or “radical,” to attract more readers? More to your point, in my model of the universe rotation or “spin” is an effect, not a cause. Even after reading several of your other comments I’m still having difficulty grasping the essence of “topological vortex.” And, as far as spin and gravity are concerned, spin resultant of an input of external energy only intensifies the strength of an existing field of gravity around any object, from the sub-atomic to the cosmic. The exact nature of the higher force that induces gravity in all objects still eludes me but I postulate it may be due to ultra high frequency reverberations of the big bang. My lay findings do not require exquisite math, either. Decades of employment as an industrial electrician in conjunction with simple at-home experiments with rotating wheels (e.g., https://odysee.com/@charlesgshaver:d/1Gravity:8) have proved them to me.

  2. There have been many studies and discussions related to quantum. Is it really impossible to understand the physical essence of quantum in today’s physics? Why would today’s physics rather use a cat than use topological vortices in mathematics to understand quantum? Is two-dimensional matter a real existence? The two-dimensional material observed in physical experiments and the two-dimensional image in mathematics, which is the true two-dimensional?
    Mathematics is the language of science. Physics must rely on mathematics to truly understand and comprehend the world we live in.
    CP violation is a typical pseudoscientific theory, and had caused great confusion in contemporary physics.
    If you don’t want to be fooled by the pseudoscientific ideas, you can browse the comments of https://scitechdaily.com/microscope-spacecrafts-most-precise-test-of-key-component-of-the-theory-of-general-relativity/ or https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/595280873.
    I hope more people dare to stand up and fight against rampant pseudoscience.
    Wishing you all the best.

  3. There have been many studies and discussions related to quantum. Is it really impossible to understand the physical essence of quantum in today’s physics? Why would today’s physics rather use a cat than use topological vortices in mathematics to understand quantum? Is two-dimensional matter a real existence? The two-dimensional material observed in physical experiments and the two-dimensional image in mathematics, which is the true two-dimensional?
    Mathematics is the language of science. Physics must rely on mathematics to truly understand and comprehend the world we live in.
    CP violation is a typical pseudoscientific theory, and had caused great confusion in contemporary physics.
    If you don’t want to be fooled by the pseudoscientific ideas, you can browse the comments of https://scitechdaily.com/microscope-spacecrafts-most-precise-test-of-key-component-of-the-theory-of-general-relativity/ or https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/595280873.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.