The Best (and Worst) Materials for Homemade COVID Masks

COVID 19 Mask Materials

People making homemade masks might want to reach for a vacuum cleaner filter.

It’s intuitive and scientifically shown that wearing a face covering can help reduce the spread of the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19. But not all masks are created equal, according to new University of Arizona-led research.

Amanda Wilson, an environmental health sciences doctoral candidate in the Department of Community, Environment and Policy in the Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, is lead author on a recent study published in the Journal of Hospital Infection that assessed the ability of a variety of nontraditional mask materials to protect a person from infection after 30 seconds and after 20 minutes of exposure in a highly contaminated environment.

When the researchers compared wearing masks to wearing no protection during 20-minute and 30-second exposures to the virus, they found that infection risks were reduced by 24-94% or by 44-99% depending on the mask and exposure duration. Risk reduction decreased as exposure duration increased, they found.

“N99 masks, which are even more efficient at filtering airborne particles than N95 masks, are obviously one of the best options for blocking the virus, as they can reduce average risk by 94-99% for 20-minute and 30-second exposures, but they can be hard to come by, and there are ethical considerations such as leaving those available for medical professionals,” Wilson said.

Sewing COVID 19 Masks

The next best options, according to the research, are N95 and surgical masks and, perhaps surprisingly, vacuum cleaner filters, which can be inserted into filter pockets in cloth masks. The vacuum filters reduced infection risk by 83% for a 30-second exposure and 58% for a 20-minute exposure. Of the other nontraditional materials evaluated by the researchers, tea towels, cotton-blend fabrics and antimicrobial pillowcases were the next best for protection.

Scarves, which reduced infection risk by 44% after 30 seconds and 24% after 20 minutes, and similarly effective cotton t-shirts are only slightly better than wearing no mask at all, they found.

“We knew that masks work, but we wanted to know how well and compare different materials’ effects on health outcomes,” said Wilson, who specializes in quantitative microbial risk assessment.

Wilson and her team collected data from various studies of mask efficacy and created a computer model to simulate infection risk, taking various factors into consideration.

“One big component of risk is how long you’re exposed. We compared risk of infection at both 30 seconds and 20 minutes in a highly contaminated environment,” she said.

Other conditions that impact risk of infection are the number of people around you and their distance from you, she said.

The size of virus-transporting droplets from sneezes, coughs or even speech is also a very important factor. Larger, heavier droplets carrying the virus drop out of the air faster than smaller, lighter ones. That’s one reason distance helps reduce exposure.

“Aerosol size can also be affected by humidity,” Wilson said. “If the air is drier, then aerosols become smaller faster. If humidity is higher, then aerosols will stay larger for a longer period of time, dropping out faster. That might sound good at first, but then those aerosols fall on surfaces, and that object becomes another potential exposure route.”

The study also showed that the more time a person spends in an environment where the virus is present, the less effective a mask becomes.

“That doesn’t mean take your mask off after 20 minutes,” Wilson said, “but it does mean that a mask can’t reduce your risk to zero. Don’t go to a bar for four hours and think you’re risk free because you’re wearing a mask. Stay home as much as possible, wash your hands often, wear a mask when you’re out and don’t touch your face.”

Masks protect the wearer and others in a number of different ways. Wilson said there are two “intuitive ways” that masks filter larger aerosols: mechanical interception and inertial impaction.

“The denser the fibers of a material, the better it is at filtering. That’s why higher thread counts lead to higher efficacy. There’s just more to block the virus,” she said. “But some masks (such as those made from silk) also have electrostatic properties, which can attract smaller particles and keep them from passing through the mask as well.”

The model developed by Wilson and her colleagues included parameters such as inhalation rate – the volume of air inhaled over time – and virus concentration in the air.

“We took a lot of research data, put it into a mathematical model and related those data points to each other,” Wilson said. “For example, if we know people’s inhalation rates vary by this much and know this much virus is in the air and these materials offer this much efficiency in terms of filtration, what does that mean for infection risk? We provide a range, in part, because everyone is different, such as in how much air we breathe over time.”

Wilson also said it’s important for a mask to have a good seal that pinches at nose, and she noted that people shouldn’t wear a mask beneath the nose or tuck it under the chin when not in use.

“Proper use of masks is so important,” Wilson said. “Also, we were focusing on masks protecting the wearer, but they’re most important to protect others around you if you’re infected. If you put less virus out into the air, you’re creating a less contaminated environment around you. As our model shows, the amount of infectious virus you’re exposed to has a big impact on your infection risk and the potential for others’ masks to protect them as well.”

Reference: “COVID-19 and non-traditional mask use: How do various materials compare in reducing the infection risk for mask wearers?” Amanda M. Wilson, Sarah E. Abney, Marco-Felipe King, Mark H. Weir, Martín López-García, Jonathan D. Sexton, Stephanie J. Dancer, Jessica Proctor, Catherine J.Noakes and Kelly A. Reynolds, Accepted 26 May 2020, Journal of Hospital Infection.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.05.036

21 Comments on "The Best (and Worst) Materials for Homemade COVID Masks"

  1. Shop masks online from a huge collection at the best prices from Bewakoof Reusable Washable Pollution Mask All Weather Friendly Free Shipping COD

  2. Vacuum-cleaner filters are recommended in the article as a means to enhance the protection offered by a cloth mask, but can coffee filters also offer the same level of protection?

  3. dan winright | July 12, 2020 at 11:51 am | Reply

    Dumbocraps want hog rings through your nose to keep your face diaper secure.

  4. Masks4Health | July 12, 2020 at 11:56 am | Reply

    Vacuum filters are meant to trap dust particles and are denser than a coffee filter, which has many micro-holes to allow water to pass through.

  5. Please be cautious when using vacuum bags or filters in your masks as they contain fiberglass. HEPA filters use hundreds of thousands of fiberglass fibers—incredibly small and sticky for particles that try to pass through them. This tight weave of fibers then captures particles larger than 0.3 microns in size. Please do your research.

  6. Rebecca Lloyd | July 12, 2020 at 5:05 pm | Reply

    So this is a regurgitation of data from late May. I thought this was an update to earlier research.

  7. Rowena L fernan | July 12, 2020 at 6:31 pm | Reply

    I hand sew face mask from eco bags,with small pockets inside to put in cotton cloth filters for more protection. I have given out for free 100 Pcs already and counting. Small help.

  8. I developed a mask that converts energy from the sun and various other light sources into UVC 265nm emission outwards from where my patented emulsion is put. This makes my mask antiviral. I’ve also impregnated fabric with nano-metallic compounds that make it antiviral. Finally, my masks are double layered and the first front layer provides a liquid barrier. The second layer is cooling and also Antimicrobial. Please check out my website. I’d like everyone to know how they can save their life and others by wearing my masks.

  9. Loved your post! Vital information for living in the new “normal”

    With the new information provided by WHO, stating that the COVID-19 virus could be airborne in certain conditions, wearing facemasks at all times is now essential for personal safety and the safety of others.
    Cotton facemasks are the most comfortable option during these times. They are skin-friendly, reusable, and can be comfortably worn for long durations.

  10. 600masksandsewing | July 13, 2020 at 6:56 am | Reply

    Vacuum filters should NOT be used based on the risk of fiberglass being inhaled into the lungs and causing serious problems. HEPA manufacturers and distributors have expressly forbid their use for face masks as the filters are not intended for such use.

    • Actually, several vacuum bag manufacturers have been at pains to reassure people that, no, their bags do not contain fibreglass. Don’t believe everything you read on Facebook.

  11. How about a hepa vaccum bag that traps up to 0.1 micron?

  12. I hope you’re not suggesting either with or without intent, that we use Hepa filters.

  13. JENNA R WOLBERT | July 15, 2020 at 10:12 am | Reply

    3M does not use fiber glass in their HEPA filter for air purifiers. I cut one apart and got about 3 yards of material and pleated them. I don’t know about vacuum filters or other brands, and 3M doesn’t recommend using their air filters for masks. They’ve made this disclaimer already, but how many medications do we use off lable? You do YOUR research…I did mine and I decided a pocket for a HEPA air filter mask made me feel more protected along with the 100% quilting cotton it’s been recommended to use.

  14. Stephen Gerretse | July 19, 2020 at 5:47 pm | Reply

    I read this hoping for some advice, with science behind it, for materials to use when making a mask. The title seemed to promise that, but did not deliver.

  15. Jesse Vazquez | July 24, 2020 at 9:24 am | Reply

    valved face masks release unfiltered air into the environment if you are sick asymptomatic or otherwise your exhaled air will be contaminated and not filtered putting everyone in danger avoid people and masks that have valves these should even be available!

  16. Jesse Vazquez | July 24, 2020 at 9:26 am | Reply

    valved face masks release unfiltered air into the environment if you are sick asymptomatic or otherwise your exhaled air will be contaminated and not filtered putting everyone in danger avoid people and masks that have valves these should not even be available!

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.