Astrophysicists Zero In on How the Universe Responds to Gravity

May 11, 2012

Science

A galactic image taken by the Hubble Space Telescope

A galactic image taken by the Hubble Space Telescope. Galaxies like this one "screen" the effect of a hypothetical fifth force.

Astrophysicists are getting closer to understanding the unexplained force that influences the laws of gravity throughout space. Newly published findings narrow down the possibilities of what this force could be as they research a fifth force (beyond gravity, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces) that alters gravity on cosmologically large scales.

Most people take gravity for granted. But for University of Pennsylvania astrophysicist Bhuvnesh Jain, the nature of gravity is the question of a lifetime. As scientists have been able to see farther and deeper into the universe, the laws of gravity have been revealed to be under the influence of an unexplained force.

By innovatively analyzing a well-studied class of stars in nearby galaxies, Jain and his colleagues — Vinu Vikram, Anna Cabre and Joseph Clampitt at Penn and Jeremy Sakstein at the University of Cambridge — have produced new findings that narrow down the possibilities of what this force could be. Their findings, published on the Arxiv, are a vindication of Einstein’s theory of gravity. Having survived a century of tests in the solar system, it has passed this new test in galaxies beyond our own as well.

In 1998, astrophysicists made an observation that turned gravity on its ear: the universe’s rate of expansion is speeding up. If gravity acts the same everywhere, stars and galaxies propelled outward by the Big Bang should continuously slow down, like objects thrown from an explosion do here on Earth.

This observation used distant supernovae to show that the expansion of the universe was speeding up rather than slowing down. This indicated that something was missing from physicists’ understanding of how the universe responds to gravity, which is described by Einstein’s theory of general relativity. Two branches of theories have sprung up, each trying to fill its gaps in a different way.

Bhuvnesh Jain in his office

Bhuvnesh Jain in his office. The lens simulates gravitational lensing, a phenomenon predicted by general relativity.

One branch — dark energy — suggests that the vacuum of space has an energy associated with it and that energy causes the observed acceleration. The other falls under the umbrella of “scalar-tensor” gravity theories, which effectively posits a fifth force (beyond gravity, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces) that alters gravity on cosmologically large scales.

“These two possibilities are both radical in their own way,” Jain said.  “One is saying that general relativity is correct, but we have this strange new form of energy. The other is saying we don’t have a new form of energy, but gravity is not described by general relativity everywhere.”

Jain’s research is focused on the latter possibility; he is attempting to characterize the properties of this fifth force that disrupts the predictions general relativity makes outside our own galaxy, on cosmic length scales. Jain’s recent breakthrough came about when he and his colleagues realized they could use the troves of data on a special property of a common type of star as an exquisite test of gravity.

Astrophysicists have been pursuing tests of gravity in the cosmos for many years, but conventional tests require data on millions of galaxies. Future observations are expected to provide such enormous datasets in the coming data. But Jain and his colleagues were able to bypass the conventional approach.

“We’ve been able to perform a powerful test using just 25 nearby galaxies that is more than a hundred times more stringent than standard cosmological tests,” Jain said.

The nearby galaxies are important because they contain stars called cepheids that are bright enough to be seen individually. Moreover, cepheids have been used for decades as a kind of interstellar yardstick because their brightness oscillates in a precise and predictable way.

“You can measure the brightness of a light bulb at some distance and know that, if you move it twice as far, it will be four times as faint. So you can tell just by the difference in its observed brightness how much further you moved it,” Jain said. “But you need to know how intrinsically bright the bulb is first to determine its actual distance from us.”

Cepheids have a unique trait that allows astrophysicists to get this critical information: their luminosity oscillates over the course of days and weeks. The known relationship between a cepheid’s rate of oscillation and intrinsic brightness serves as that baseline for calculating its distance from Earth, which in turn serves as a baseline for calculating the distance of other celestial objects. The accelerating universe observation, for example, relied upon cepheid data for scale.

“Now that we understand a little bit more about what makes the cepheids pulsate — a balance of gravity and pressure — we can use them to learn about gravity, not just distance,” Jain said. “If the fifth force enhances gravity even a little bit, it will make them pulsate faster.”

Because of their usefulness, there was already more than a decade of data on cepheids based on the Hubble Space Telescope and other large telescopes in Chile and Hawaii. Using that data, Jain and his colleagues compared nearly a thousand  stars in 25 galaxies. This allowed them to make comparisons between galaxies that are theoretically “screened” or protected from the effects of the hypothetical fifth force and those that are not.

Larger galaxies and ones that belong to galaxy clusters are screened, while smaller, isolated galaxies are not.

“If we compare galaxies that don’t permit this extra force, like our own galaxy, with others that do, then we should see a difference in the way those galaxies’ cepheids behave,” Jain said. “Because this new force would increase the speed of their oscillations and because we can use the rate of their oscillations to their measure distance from us, the measurement we get from cepheids in unscreened galaxies should be smaller than distance measurements made with different techniques.”

Jain and his colleagues ultimately did not see variation between their control sample of screened galaxies and their test sample of unscreened ones. Their results line up exactly with the prediction of Einstein’s general relativity. This means that the potential range and strength of the fifth force is severely constrained.

“We find consistency with Einstein’s theory of gravity and we sharply narrow the space available to these other theories. Many of these theories are now ruled out by the data,” Jain said.

With better data on nearby galaxies in the coming years, Jain expects that an entire class of gravity theories could essentially be eliminated. But there remains the exciting possibility that better data may reveal small deviations from Einstein’s gravity, one of the most famous scientific theories of all time.

Source: Evan Lerner, Penn News

Images: NASA, ESA; Penn News

Email
, , , , , , ,

Subscribe / Follow

Don't miss out. Follow the latest technology & science news via email or social media.

4 Responses to “Astrophysicists Zero In on How the Universe Responds to Gravity”

  1. Jason DeBord Says:

    The fifth force is most likely a “counter gravity” that grows in the absence of gravity-producing objects. Instead of attracting like gravity, it repels. As the universe expands and more pockets of deep space are created that are completely devoid of gravity, “counter gravity” grows. The more it grows, the faster the acceleration of expansion. It’s a pretty simple concept. The Viking spacecraft might be encountering the force as they leave the heliosphere.

    Reply

  2. ToreT Says:

    Consider a Foam Univers Structure, where bubble universes are “glued” together like foam bubles. Galaxes are drawn towards the bubbles “surface” and then sliding down towards the joinings with other universes, with increasing speed. The answer is simply that there are gravitational objects outside our own universe, that we not yet have observed.

    Try it out with soap foam in a kettle.

    Reply

  3. Madanagopal.V.C Says:

    There is no need to assume gravitating objects outside our universe. The concept of dark matter is enough, since they have anti-gravitational properties that propel galaxies against the gravity of the universe, to fly far apart at a fantastic speed in the expanding universe. If Newton`s law of gravitation confines itself to only second power of distance between heavenly bodies viz., F=g*m1*m2/d^2, Einstein’s general theory of relativity assumes third and fourth powers of distance whose contribution is insignificant in the violent forces acting on distant galaxies expanding for ever. Thank YOu.

    Reply

  4. Wardell Says:

    Gravity is not described by Relativity, Gravitational Energy is a Quaternion Energy consisting of a scalar energy and a vector energy:

    W = -mGM/r + cmV = -vh/r + cP where cP is the momentum energy of mass m.

    The Momentum Energy is a vector energy and is the so-called “Dark Energy”.
    Failure to include the Momentum energy is to say that the mass m is not moving. The mass m is moving and has vector momentum and Momentum energy.

    the Momentum energy and its centrifugal force is explanation of “Dark Energy” and the Cosmological Constant and the red shift.

    The Gravitational Force is
    F = XW =[d/dr, DEL][-vh/r, cP] =[vp/r – cDEL.P, cdP/dr -DEL vh/r + cDELxP]

    F = [vp/r -cp/r cos(P), -cp/r 1P + vp/r 1R + cp/r sin(P) 1RxP]

    F = cp/r[v/c -cos(P), -1P + v/c 1R + sin(P)1RxP]

    The centripetal force is vp/r, the centrifugal force is cDEL.P = cp/r cos(P).

    At Continuity vpr=cp/r cos(P) gives v/c =cos(P), this is the red shift, the balance of the gravitational centripetal force and the centrifugal force. The centrifugal force is the Divergence of the vector energy cP.

    See below for further info:

    http://www.amazon.com/Modifying-Newtons-Laws-ebook/dp/B005GPQI3M/ref=sr_1_5?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1369107010&sr=1-5

    Reply

Leave a Reply