New Cosmic Model Favors “Big Rip” Demise of Universe

Big Bang to Big Rip

Illustration of the Big Rip scenario (Jeremy Teaford / Vanderbilt)

A fundamentally new mathematical formulation from Vanderbilt University has some significant implications for the ultimate fate of the universe.

The universe can be a very sticky place, but just how sticky is a matter of debate.

That is because for decades cosmologists have had trouble reconciling the classic notion of viscosity based on the laws of thermodynamics with Einstein’s general theory of relativity. However, a team from Vanderbilt University has come up with a fundamentally new mathematical formulation of the problem that appears to bridge this long-standing gap.

The new math has some significant implications for the ultimate fate of the universe. It tends to favor one of the more radical scenarios that cosmologists have come up with known as the “Big Rip.” It may also shed new light on the basic nature of dark energy.

The new approach was developed by Assistant Professor of Mathematics Marcelo Disconzi in collaboration with physics professors Thomas Kephart and Robert Scherrer and is described in a paper published earlier this year in the journal Physical Review D.

“Marcelo has come up with a simpler and more elegant formulation that is mathematically sound and obeys all the applicable physical laws,” said Scherrer.

The type of viscosity that has cosmological relevance is different from the familiar “ketchup” form of viscosity, which is called shear viscosity and is a measure of a fluid’s resistance to flowing through small openings like the neck of a ketchup bottle. Instead, cosmological viscosity is a form of bulk viscosity, which is the measure of a fluid’s resistance to expansion or contraction. The reason we don’t often deal with bulk viscosity in everyday life is because most liquids we encounter cannot be compressed or expanded very much.

Disconzi began by tackling the problem of relativistic fluids. Astronomical objects that produce this phenomenon include supernovae (exploding stars) and neutron stars (stars that have been crushed down to the size of planets).

Scientists have had considerable success modeling what happens when ideal fluids – those with no viscosity – are boosted to near-light speeds. But almost all fluids are viscous in nature and, despite decades of effort, no one has managed to come up with a generally accepted way to handle viscous fluids traveling at relativistic velocities. In the past, the models formulated to predict what happens when these more realistic fluids are accelerated to a fraction of the speed of light have been plagued with inconsistencies: the most glaring of which has been predicting certain conditions where these fluids could travel faster than the speed of light.

“This is disastrously wrong,” said Disconzi, “since it is well-proven experimentally that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.”

These problems inspired the mathematician to re-formulate the equations of relativistic fluid dynamics in a way that does not exhibit the flaw of allowing faster-than-light speeds. He based his approach on one that was advanced in the 1950s by French mathematician André Lichnerowicz.

Next, Disconzi teamed up with Kephart and Scherrer to apply his equations to broader cosmological theory. This produced a number of interesting results, including some potential new insights into the mysterious nature of dark energy.

In the 1990s, the physics community was shocked when astronomical measurements showed that the universe is expanding at an ever-accelerating rate. To explain this unpredicted acceleration, they were forced to hypothesize the existence of an unknown form of repulsive energy that is spread throughout the universe. Because they knew so little about it, they labeled it “dark energy.”

Most dark energy theories to date have not taken cosmic viscosity into account, despite the fact that it has a repulsive effect strikingly similar to that of dark energy. “It is possible, but not very likely, that viscosity could account for all the acceleration that has been attributed to dark energy,” said Disconzi. “It is more likely that a significant fraction of the acceleration could be due to this more prosaic cause. As a result, viscosity may act as an important constraint on the properties of dark energy.”

Another interesting result involves the ultimate fate of the universe. Since the discovery of the universe’s run-away expansion, cosmologists have come up with a number of dramatic scenarios of what it could mean for the future.

One scenario, dubbed the “Big Freeze,” predicts that after 100 trillion years or so the universe will have grown so vast that the supplies of gas will become too thin for stars to form. As a result, existing stars will gradually burn out, leaving only black holes which, in turn, slowly evaporate away as space itself gets colder and colder.

An even more radical scenario is the “Big Rip.” It is predicated on a type of “phantom” dark energy that gets stronger over time. In this case, the expansion rate of the universe becomes so great that in 22 billion years or so material objects begin to fall apart and individual atoms disassemble themselves into unbound elementary particles and radiation.

The key value involved in this scenario is the ratio between dark energy’s pressure and density, what is called its equation of state parameter. If this value drops below -1, then the universe will eventually be pulled apart. Cosmologists have called this the “phantom barrier.” In previous models with viscosity the universe could not evolve beyond this limit.

In the Desconzi-Kephart-Scherrer formulation, however, this barrier does not exist. Instead, it provides a natural way for the equation of state parameter to fall below -1.

“In previous models with viscosity the Big Rip was not possible,” said Scherrer. “In this new model, viscosity actually drives the universe toward this extreme end state.”

According to the scientists, the results of their pen-and-paper analyses of this new formulation for relativistic viscosity are quite promising but a much deeper analysis must be carried out to determine its viability. The only way to do this is to use powerful computers to analyze the complex equations numerically. In this fashion the scientists can make predictions that can be compared with experiment and observation.

The research was supported by National Science Foundation grant 1305705 and Department of Energy grant DE-SC0011981.

Publication: Marcelo M. Disconzi, et al., “New approach to cosmological bulk viscosity,” Physical Review D 91, 043532, 27 February 2015; doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.043532

Source: David Salisbury, Vanderbilt University

4 Comments on "New Cosmic Model Favors “Big Rip” Demise of Universe"

  1. 22 Billion Years until the Big Rip?

    That’s like no time at all.

    Even 100 trillion years isnt that long…

    I thought the universe is extrapolated to exist for a googol years or more until all particles and vlack holes evaporate??

    • This does not take into account that dark energy makes up ~95% of the universe.
      This dark matter will feed the expansion allowing the fabric, or string to enlarge and hold the universe together, plus adding the energy to form new stars and galaxies.
      Don’t hold your breath till the finish, we have a ways to go.

  2. The universe is infinite and will never end as long as gravity exist, and gravity is a force that exist in the multiverses, multi dimensions, and just as infinite as the universe.

    Black holes are the proof of the universe being an infinite loop. Black holes appear black because gravity had warped the space, time as we known it, which include light to have coming down to another dimension that we have no understanding. This gravity will attract, then vaporize as the singularity being merged into the larger universe where everything is a simple “god matter” everything which came with the singularity will be converted to be the part of “god matter” and again create a negative force which create gravity in which affect every other universes including ours. This “god matter” could become anything from quarts to atoms….etc just as long as it can balance and distribute all forces to keep itself in balance.

    Black holes can easily be understood as throwing a rock into a river. Instead being sunk into the bottom, the singularity just get converted once it is out of our universe, out of it laws and physics.

    Dark matter contributes toward gravity.

    Gravity will continue to form galaxy, existed space dust, or “god matter” will be converted back into whatever our universe needs.

    This “God matter” is the most basic form of matter throughout the multiverse, and we have no name, no understanding of it…..we only know that it can become anything that a universe need, just as long as the whole existence still exist.

    There is no beginning, and there is no end……just existence.

    This could easily be understood of gravity as “charges” as long as something is “positive” there will be “negative” to balance the existence. That is why energy do not disappear, but rather converted. Therefore “gravity” not suddenly “existed” but rather created by the matter, and forces that we don’t understand. Just as much as if you want a dough to be denser, you have to use your hand and compress it. This matter and forces are from the “god matter” which not only affect us, but everything in existence, including other universes….etc.

    Is it possible to travel from one universe to another ? Nothing is impossible, just we do not understand it. Perhap starting with gravity first ? Even when we are out of this universe, we will then face another universe where gravity became negative gravity….where instead of pulling, it is the infinite of pushing. When this theory applies, our universe black holes contribute to this, other universe contributes to this….etc.

    Once again, everything has the beginning and the end, but not existence….because existence is everything, and it will always exist. So is our universe, don’t be foolish to think hundred billion of years our universe will end… one can live that long, nothing in our universe will, but then it is more likely that everything has already recycling itself within our universe.

    Even our souls are a part of this “god matter” that we don’t even understand…yet. This “God matter” can easier be understood as “Stem cell” where it is a part of a human body…it just is a part of the “existence”

  3. To assume the universe began in a state of extreme heat would be in error. where did the heat come from?

    What if heat(dark energy?) was created in the cores of all spheres and it took the universe 13.7 billion years for it to get this warm? What if the equal opposite reaction to this dark energy being created was gravity? So gravity, dark energy are one and the same just different reactions to the same action. What if the shape of the sphere causes pressure? What if pressure actually did create heat(see thermodynamics). Heat is energy, do you realize that? Gravity is the movement of space towards a sphere while energy moves away from the sphere, equally opposite to gravity. They are equally opposite, so small spheres not large enough to produce the energy required to keep from being repelled follow the flow of space as it moves towards the largest sphere. But two spheres that do produce enough energy do not collide but take on orbits around each other. Then energy the two spheres produce causes the space to expand between them and their orbital radius increases. Dark energy is the production of new space.

    If all this were true then the big bang never occurred. Most likely the universe simply grew from a quantum size to the size it is today. Spheres produce gravity, energy and space. Energy cannot be destroyed. Energy however can convert back into matter(see pair production and law of conservation), tipping the scales in favor for matter to grow via accretion throughout the universe.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.