Researchers found the secret seems to lie in the merging of medium-mass stars.
Astronomers from Georgia State University have found an explanation for the strange occurrence of massive stars located far from their birthplace in the disk of our Milky Way Galaxy.
Stars more massive than the Sun have very hot cores that drive nuclear energy generation at very high rates. They are among the brightest objects in our galaxy. But because they burn through their hydrogen fuel so quickly, their lifetimes are relatively short, perhaps 10 million years compared to 10 billion years for the Sun.
Their short lifetime means that there is little time for them to stray too far from their birthplace. Most massive stars are found in the flat disk part of our galaxy, where gas clouds are dense enough to promote star birth and where astronomers find young clusters of massive stars.
So, when a massive star is found far away from the galaxy’s disk, how did it get there?
“Astronomers are finding massive stars far away from their place of origin, so far, in fact, that it takes longer than the star’s lifetime to get there,” said Georgia State astronomer Douglas Gies. “How this could happen is a topic of active debate among scientists.”
This is the problem presented by the massive star known as HD93521 that lies about 3,600 light years above the galaxy’s disk. A new study by Gies and other astronomers from Georgia State reveals a profound discrepancy: The flight time to reach this location far exceeds the predicted age of this massive star.
The astronomers used a new distance estimate from the European Space Agency’s Gaia spacecraft together with an investigation of the star’s spectrum to determine the star’s mass and age as well as its motion through space. They find that HD93521 has a mass about 17 times larger than the Sun’s, and this leads to a predicted age of about 5 million years. On the other hand, the motion of the star indicates that its journey from the disk has taken much longer, about 39 million years.
The Georgia State astronomers explain this strange difference between the star’s lifetime and travel time by suggesting that HD93521 left the disk as two lower-mass and longer-lived stars, rather than the single massive star we see today. Their findings have been published in The Astronomical Journal.
The clue to the mystery is that HD93521 is one of the fastest rotating stars in the galaxy. Stars can spin up through stellar mergers where two close orbiting stars can grow over time and collide to form one star.
“HD93521 probably began life as a close pair of medium-mass stars that were fated to engulf each other and create the single, fast-spinning star we see today,” Gies said.
Such intermediate mass stars live long enough to match the long flight time of HD93521.
HD93521 is not the only case of a massive star found so far away from its birthplace. Georgia State graduate student Peter Wysocki is investigating an example of a distant massive binary pair that is probably representative of the stage just before a merger. This star is known as IT Librae, and it has an orientation that creates mutual eclipses as the two stars pass in front of each other. An investigation of the variations in the light output and motions detected in the spectra leads to estimates of the stellar masses.
Wysocki finds a similar conundrum from the mass results — the predicted age is much less than IT Librae’s travel time from the disk. But the study also reveals that the lower-mass star in the pair has already begun to transfer much of its mass to the higher-mass star, initiating the process that may eventually lead to a merger. This means that the higher-mass star is actually older than it appears, having begun life as a lower-mass star.
These distant massive stars provide striking evidence that close pairs of stars can merge to make even larger stars, Gies said, and they are key clues about how rapidly rotating massive stars are able to create black holes with large spins.
Reference: “The Transformative Journey of HD 93521” by Douglas R. Gies, Katherine Shepard, Peter Wysocki and Robert Klement, 31 January 2022, The Astronomical Journal.
This work was supported through a grant from the National Science Foundation.
So, this paper was written by Americans. why do I believe this, because they use henry draper’s catalogue number and not Hipparcos catalogue number for this star. if its lum is 34635 watt/sec,
than its lifetime is 6,035,000.0 yrs. Simbad list this Stars as O9.5III and possible a binary , Celestia Star program list it as O9V. So, Not a good Star to use, and the problem of different info for the same object is so wide in Science that it made sick…
EPIC in EPIC249249722 stands for Ecliptic Plane Input Catalog.
HIP76161 is the reference name for the star in the Hipparcos Star Catalogue.
The Id of the star in the Henry Draper catalogue is HD138503.
The star is catalogued in the Tycho-2 star catalogue as TYC-6768-1485-1. All the above are names for IT Librae. WHAT “the predicted age is much less than IT Librae’s travel time from the disk”, how much time is that ??? Simbad list this Star as B2/3IV eclipsing binary so you it info of it orbits to find the system MASS, right !?! Do you have that ???