Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Health»Beans vs. Beef: Is Reducing Red Meat Safe for Bone Health and Protein Intake?
    Health

    Beans vs. Beef: Is Reducing Red Meat Safe for Bone Health and Protein Intake?

    By University of HelsinkiAugust 23, 20238 Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Fava Beans
    The University of Helsinki’s study revealed that replacing some red and processed meat with pea and faba bean-based foods doesn’t jeopardize dietary amino acid intake or bone health. As plant-based diets rise in popularity, ensuring proper intake of calcium and vitamin D remains vital. Leg4Life, a related project, focuses on promoting a sustainable and healthier food system using legumes.

    New research demonstrated that the partial substitution of red and processed meat with pea- and fava bean–based food products ensured sufficient intake of amino acids in the diet and did not negatively affect bone metabolism. The study was conducted at the University of Helsinki.

    “Decreasing the consumption of red and processed meat in the diet to the upper limit of the Planetary Health Diet while increasing the consumption of legumes cultivated in Finland, such as peas and fava beans, is safe from the perspective of protein nutrition. Similarly, bone health is not compromised by such a dietary change either,” says Docent Suvi Itkonen from the Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry.

    BeanMan Study Overview

    In the BeanMan study, 102 Finnish men followed a study diet for six weeks.

    • One group consumed 760 grams of red and processed meat per week, which accounted for 25% of the total protein intake. The amount corresponds to the average protein consumption of Finnish men.
    • The other group consumed food products based on legumes, mainly peas and fava beans, corresponding to 20% of the total protein intake. In addition, the amount of red and processed meat consumed per week in this group amounted to the upper limit of the Planetary Health Diet (200 g or 5% of the total protein intake).

    Otherwise, the study subjects followed their habitual diet but were not allowed to eat other red or processed meat or legumes than those provided by the study.

    Study Results and Implications

    The researchers did not find any differences between the dietary groups in markers of bone formation or resorption. Neither did the intake of calcium or vitamin D differ between the groups. Calcium intake was in line with the current dietary recommendations, and the intake of vitamin D was very close to the recommendations. Mean essential amino acid and protein intakes met the recommendations in both groups.

    “Reducing red meat consumption is extremely important in terms of environmental impact,” Itkonen notes.

    Increasingly plant-based diets are becoming more and more popular, and the recently updated Nordic Nutrition Recommendations also emphasize the restriction of meat consumption and the moderation of dairy consumption.

    “In this study, the subjects consumed dairy products as in their habitual diets, thus their calcium and vitamin D intakes were unchanged. However, in terms of bone health, it is important to bear in mind that if one reduces the amount of dairy in the diet, it is necessary to ensure the intake of calcium and vitamin D from other sources. These sources can be plant-based beverages and yogurt-like products fortified with those nutrients or, when necessary, dietary supplements,” Itkonen points out.

    Upcoming Publications and Related Projects

    Additional insights from the BeanMan study regarding lipid metabolism, gut health, and nutrient intakes are slated for future publication.

    Reference: “Effects of partial replacement of red and processed meat with non-soya legumes on bone and mineral metabolism and amino acid intakes in BeanMan randomised clinical trial” by Suvi T. Itkonen, Piia Karhu, Tiina Pellinen, Mikko Lehtovirta, Niina E. Kaartinen, Satu Männistö, Essi Päivärinta and Anne-Maria Pajari, 10 July 2023, British Journal Of Nutrition.
    DOI: 10.1017/S0007114523001514

    Leg4Life (Legumes for Sustainable Food System and Healthy Life – Palkokasveilla kohti kestävää ruokajärjestelmää ja terveyttä) is a multidisciplinary project funded by the Strategic Research Council of the Academy of Finland. Leg4Life aims to achieve a comprehensive societal change towards a healthier food system and climate neutral food production and consumption by increasing the use of legumes. There are five extensive work packages in the project that cover the whole food chain from field to dinner table, all researching legumes that thrive in Finnish boreal conditions.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Bones Food Science Nutrition Popular Protein University of Helsinki
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    30,000 Brain Scans Reveal a Hidden Danger in Ultra-Processed Foods

    Just a Small Amount of Protein Supplement Helps Control Type 2 Diabetes

    Industrial Chemicals – Linked to a Long List of Serious Health Problems – Detected in US Fast Foods

    Highly Processed Foods Harm Memory in the Aging Brain – But Omega-3 Supplements May Help

    New Nutrient Profiling System: Ranking Healthfulness of Foods From First to Worst

    Small Changes in Diet Could Help You Live Much Healthier and More Sustainably

    Anti-nutrients? They’re Part of a Normal Diet and Not As Scary as They Sound

    Study Finds Eating Mangoes Reduces Women’s Facial Wrinkles

    Researchers Warn: Common Food Additive – Banned in France but Allowed in the U.S. – Causes Adverse Health Effects in Mice

    8 Comments

    1. Mike on August 24, 2023 2:59 am

      Sure, red meat bad, vegetables are good for people who don’t have sensitivities to them that cause inflammation, unnecessary weight gain, cluster and migraine headaches for 72 hours after consuming them.

      Reply
    2. Jimi on August 24, 2023 9:15 am

      Sorry, but having to consume “plant-based beverages and yogurt-like products fortified with (calcium and vitamin D)” is right out! I’ll stick with a more traditional diet focusing on fish with a bit of red meat.

      Reply
    3. Snowball Solar System on August 24, 2023 11:25 am

      At state fairs, politicians trip over each other in their haste to be photographed at the pork pavilion, gobbling pork products. I dream of the day when they head to the bean pavilion instead.

      Reply
    4. John on August 24, 2023 5:03 pm

      I’m almost 84, been mostly vegetarian for at least 35 yrs. I walk average 4 to 5 miles each a.m. then ride my bike on streets for 45 minutes, and play Pickleball several days a week.
      Eat lots of salmon plus some chicken, an hell of a lots of beans. I feel great!
      You DO Not need that red meat S*** to stay healthy. Likely I’m in better shape than my much younger Doctors. JK in Hemet,Ca.

      Reply
    5. Clint on August 24, 2023 10:58 pm

      No it is not. There is no replacement red meat.

      Reply
    6. Shocked on August 25, 2023 12:31 am

      How is this even considered science??? No control group, and cohorts could otherwise eat whatever they wanted – as if only two food products had impact on bone health, and worse, over 6 weeks – I’m sure better scientific method was demanded of me at 18yrs old!
      What a load of BS rubbished no doubt paid for by interest groups. Sadly vegan brains are so fried by plants they don’t even notice the obvious.

      Reply
      • Confused on August 26, 2023 9:50 am

        I was thinking the same while reading this joke of a study. It was sent to me by a friend who is a MD and unfortunately, like most, aren’t really taught to critically assess dietary or pharmacological studies.

        Reply
    7. Adam on August 26, 2023 7:47 am

      Conducted a test for just 6 weeks and you think this stands as scientific evidence. Real scientists must be shaking their heads at these “so-called” scientists these days.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    The Universe Is Expanding Too Fast and Scientists Can’t Explain Why

    “Like Liquid Metal”: Scientists Create Strange Shape-Shifting Material

    Early Warning Signals of Esophageal Cancer May Be Hiding in Plain Sight

    Common Blood Pressure Drug Shows Surprising Power Against Deadly Antibiotic-Resistant Superbug

    Scientists Uncover Dangerous Connection Between Serotonin and Heart Valve Disease

    Scientists Discover a “Protector” Protein That Could Help Reverse Hair Loss

    Bone-Strengthening Discovery Could Reverse Osteoporosis

    Scientists Uncover Hidden Trigger Behind Stem Cell Aging

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Why Popular Diabetes Drugs Like Ozempic Don’t Work for Everyone: The “Genetic Glitch”
    • Scientists Create Improved Insulin Cells That Reverse Diabetes in Mice
    • Scientists Stunned After Finding Plant Thought Extinct for 60 Years
    • A Common Diabetes Drug May Hold the Key to Stopping HIV From Coming Back
    • Ancient “Syphilis-Like” Disease in Vietnam Challenges Key Scientific Assumptions
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.