How significantly do the ideas of Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk shape today’s digital economy? A study by an economic sociologist at the University of Basel has analyzed speeches, book contributions and articles from Silicon Valley from Silicon Valley, demonstrating the emergence of a new spirit of digital capitalism.
What justification is there for earning a lot of money? Nineteenth-century Calvinists interpreted economic prosperity as a sign that one was counted among God’s chosen. This manner of thinking, centered in Geneva, influenced liberal capitalism.
Today’s justifications for economic activity sound different. They focus on themes of flexibility or efficiency. In particular digital capitalists claim that they improve the world. Their credo: for every societal problem, from climate change to inequity, there is a technical solution that also offers the opportunity to make plenty of profit. This approach is known as solutionism.
Economic sociologist Oliver Nachtwey of the University of Basel, Switzerland, together with his colleague Timo Seidl from the University of Vienna, Austria, wanted to find out how influential this idea is today. For their study, they drew on a variety of texts from Silicon Valley, the global center for high technology on the US West Coast. Their results appear in the journal Theory, Culture & Society.
From the West Coast to the East Coast
With the help of a machine-learning algorithm, the researchers examined the speeches and book contributions of people like Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and Tesla CEO Elon Musk – i.e., the West Coast tech elites. They also looked at articles from Wired, the magazine popular among tech developers and programmers. The third source Nachtwey and Seidl examined was articles from the East Coast magazine Harvard Business Review, which tends to be read more by US managers rather than Silicon Valley types.
Nachtwey explains the choice of textual sources in this way: “We assumed that tech entrepreneurs like Zuckerberg would use solutionist arguments. But we wanted to know whether the ideology extends beyond the exclusive circle of Silicon Valley elites.”
For the study, multiple people first classified independently selected text excerpts with a focus on the justifications listed in the various paragraphs for economic activity: world improvement, flexibility, efficiency, etc. Next, an algorithm calculated the proportion of the various justifications in more than 1.7 million excerpts.
Solutionism is rampant
For the tech elites on the US West Coast, solutionism was indeed revealed as the most significant entrepreneurial point of reference. The idea has also become increasingly prevalent in Wired, which represents the more or less the mindsets wider tech milieu in the Silicon Valley. The Harvard Business Review, on the other hand, contained only fleeting traces of the ideology. Do-gooder fever has evidently not yet reached all corners of the US economy. With increasing digitalization, though, it will continue to spread to other areas and regions of economic activity, according to Nachtwey.
He sums up the study as follows: “We were the first to demonstrate on a broad basis of data that a new strain of thought is arising in today’s digital capitalism that provides a central justification for entrepreneurial activity. And this strain is highly influenced by solutionism.”
Not real do-gooders
Nachtwey considers this new capitalist spirit problematic because it undervalues democratic processes. The big “man of action” Musk, for example, has no appreciation for worker protections or democratic regulation. The result is that Tesla factories in Germany have far more occupational accidents than comparable Audi factories.
Nachtwey also criticizes Meta, formerly known as Facebook: it claims to bring the world together, but allows fake news to proliferate. “Solutionism doesn’t combat real problems at all; it’s just an empty ideological shell,” he concludes. Nachtwey understands his study as a critique of the American tech giants’ self-portrayals, “which we should regard with a great deal of skepticism.”
Reference: “The Solutionist Ethic and the Spirit of Digital Capitalism” by Oliver Nachtwey and Timo Seidl, 23 October 2023, Theory, Culture & Society.
DOI: 10.1177/02632764231196829
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
6 Comments
“…for every societal problem, from climate change to inequity, there is a technical solution that also offers the opportunity to make plenty of profit.”
Except hubris and greed. And those are the two these clowns are the cause of.
I find it interesting that the article assumes that climate change and inequity are societal problems. How do we know this? Arrow’s Theorem is very clear that identifying such things for a group is virtually impossible to do. We routinely use expressions like “society wants” and the “greater good” as if we really know what these are. Once we move away from the individual as the locus of decision-making we get into very murky water about determining what “society” wants. That makes me very suspicious of these types of articles because the authors have already arbitrarily decided that their view of the “problem” is correct.
Zuckerberg has done nothing to help anyone, fb and now meta are advertising vehicles…like we need more useless messages.
Musk at least launched a rocket multiple times…
conclusion: Musk is worth a lot given he has dreams…
Got to agree totally, the only problem in the greed is they have made it a priority in their life, how good can a person feel if the only motivation is money, I guess they just can’t give others a chance to flourish as harmless people of gifting and friendship or trust.
Typical woke hit-piece of a libtarded generation.
Nothing these two sociopathic con-men are advocating is in any way healthy. More technology isn’t healthy. Transhumanism isn’t healthy. How can they be anyone’s heroes after all we know about them is beyond me.