Immune Responses From 3 Different COVID-19 Vaccines Compared Over 8 Months

COVID Vaccine Comparison

Strong antibody response to mRNA vaccines declined over an eight-month follow-up period; lower initial response to single-shot Ad26 vaccine remained stable over time, research shows.

Based on the strength of clinical trial data showing the vaccines conferred robust protection against COVID-19, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration granted emergency use authorization to the mRNA-based vaccines known as BNT162b2 (BioNTech, Pfizer) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) in December 2020, and to the Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson) single-shot vaccine in February 2021. To date, nearly 200 million Americans have received a COVID-19 vaccine, and as some approach the one-year anniversary of their immunization, questions remain about the vaccines’ long-term efficacy.  

In a paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine, a team of experts at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) compared immune responses induced by the three vaccines over an eight-month follow-up period. The investigators evaluated the 61 participants’ levels of various antibodies, T cells, and other immune products at two to four weeks following complete immunization – the time of peak immunity – to eight months after vaccination. Thirty-one participants received the BNT162b2 vaccine, 22 received the mRNA-1273 vaccine and eight received the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. 

“The mRNA vaccines were characterized by high peak antibody responses that declined sharply by month six and declined further by month eight,” said corresponding author Dan H. Barouch, MD, PhD, director of the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research at BIDMC, who helped develop the Ad26 platform in collaboration with Johnson & Johnson. “The single-shot Ad26 vaccine induced lower initial antibody responses, but these responses were generally stable over time with minimal to no evidence of decline.” 

The team also found that mRNA-1273 elicited antibody responses which were generally higher and more durable than BNT162b2. All three vaccines demonstrated broad cross-reactivity to variants of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. The findings have important implications for understanding how vaccine immunity may wane over time; however, the precise immune responses necessary to confer protection against SARS-CoV-2 has not yet been determined, the researchers point out.  

“Even though neutralizing antibody levels decline, stable T cell responses and non-neutralizing antibody functions at 8 months may explain how the vaccines continue to provide robust protection against severe COVID-19,” said lead author Ai-ris Y. Collier, MD, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist at BIDMC. “Getting vaccinated (even during pregnancy) is still the best tool we have to end the COVID-19 pandemic.” 

Reference: “Differential Kinetics of Immune Responses Elicited by Covid-19 Vaccines” by Ai-ris Y. Collier, M.D.; Jingyou Yu, Ph.D.; Katherine McMahan, M.S.; Jinyan Liu, Ph.D.; Abishek Chandrashekar, M.S.; Jenny S. Maron, B.S.; Caroline Atyeo, M.S.; David R. Martinez, Ph.D.; Jessica L. Ansel, N.P.; Ricardo Aguayo, B.S.; Marjorie Rowe, B.S.; Catherine Jacob-Dolan, B.S.; Daniel Sellers, B.S.; Julia Barrett, B.S.; Kunza Ahmad, M.S.; Tochi Anioke, B.S.; Haley VanWyk, B.S.; Sarah Gardner, B.S.; Olivia Powers, B.S.; Esther A. Bondzie, B.A.; Huahua Wan, M.S.; Ralph S. Baric, Ph.D.; Galit Alter, Ph.D.; Michele R. Hacker, Sc.D. and Dan H. Barouch, M.D., Ph.D., 15 October 2021, New England Journal of Medicine.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2115596

Co-authors included Jingyou Yu, PhD, Katherine McMahan, MS, Jinyan Liu, PhD, Abishek Chandrashekar, MS, Jessica L. Ansel, NP, Marjorie Rowe, BS, Ricardo Aguayo, BS, Catherine Jacob-Dolan, BS, Daniel Sellers, BS, Julia Barrett, BS,Kunza Ahmad, MS, Tochi Anioke, BS, Haley VanWyk, BS, Sarah Gardner, BS, Olivia Powers, BS, Esther A. Bondzie, BA, Huahua Wan, MS, and Michele R. Hacker, ScD of BIDMC; Jenny S. Maron, BS, Caroline Atyeo, MS and Galit Alter, PhD, of Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard; and David R. Martinez, PhD, and Ralph S. Baric, PhD of University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  

The authors acknowledge Janssen Vaccines & Prevention, the National Institutes of Health (grant CA26047), the Massachusetts Consortium for Pathogen Readiness, the Ragon Institute and the Musk Foundation. The authors also acknowledge the Reproductive Scientist Development Program for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development and Burroughs Wellcome Fund (grant HD000849), the Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (grant TR0025410), and a Hannah H. Gray Fellowship from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Postdoctoral Enrichment Award.  

Barouch is a co-inventor on provisional vaccine patents (63/121, 482; 63/133, 969; 63/135, 182). Please see the paper for a complete list of disclosures.  

2 Comments on "Immune Responses From 3 Different COVID-19 Vaccines Compared Over 8 Months"

  1. Larry Butler W4CSC | October 20, 2021 at 3:45 am | Reply

    40 years after the lie that HIV, whos discoverer admits never existed, causes AIDS, the greedy bastards now have an imaginary vaccine for the imaginary virus. Dr Peter Duesberg, who proved cancer wasn’t caused by a virus and whos career was ruined telling the truth about AIDS,was right!

  2. Larry Butler W4CSC | October 20, 2021 at 4:11 am | Reply

    Fight COVID/SARS. Close all 6,700 military bioweapons labs and make manufacturing any more a capital offense for all involved. Destroy all stocks of Anthrax and all other bioweapons.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.