
By restructuring a common chemotherapy drug, scientists increased its potency by 20,000 times.
In a significant step forward for cancer therapy, researchers at Northwestern University have redesigned the molecular structure of a well-known chemotherapy drug, greatly increasing its solubility, effectiveness, and safety.
For this study, the scientists created the drug entirely from scratch as a spherical nucleic acid (SNA), a nanoscale structure that incorporates the drug into DNA strands surrounding tiny spheres. This innovative design transforms a compound that normally dissolves poorly and works weakly into a highly potent, precisely targeted treatment that spares healthy cells from damage.
When tested in a small animal model of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an aggressive and hard-to-treat blood cancer, the SNA-based version showed remarkable results. It entered leukemia cells 12.5 times more efficiently, destroyed them up to 20,000 times more effectively, and slowed cancer progression by a factor of 59, all without causing noticeable side effects.
According to the researchers, this achievement highlights the growing promise of structural nanomedicine, an emerging area of research where scientists carefully design both the structure and composition of nanomedicines to control how they behave inside the body. With seven SNA-based therapies already in clinical trials, this approach could pave the way for advanced vaccines and new treatments for cancer, infectious diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, and autoimmune conditions.
The findings were recently published in the journal ACS Nano.
A Breakthrough with Clinical Promise
“In animal models, we demonstrated that we can stop tumors in their tracks,” said Northwestern’s Chad A. Mirkin, who led the study. “If this translates to human patients, it’s a really exciting advance. It would mean more effective chemotherapy, better response rates and fewer side effects. That’s always the goal with any sort of cancer treatment.”
A pioneer in chemistry and nanomedicine, Mirkin is the George B. Rathmann Professor of Chemistry, Chemical and Biological Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering and Medicine at Northwestern, where he has appointments in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, McCormick School of Engineering and Feinberg School of Medicine. He also is the founding director of the International Institute for Nanotechnology and a member of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University.

For the new study, Mirkin and his team focused on the traditional chemotherapy drug 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu), which often fails to reach cancer cells efficiently. And, because it also attacks healthy tissue, 5-Fu causes myriad side effects, including nausea, fatigue and, in rare cases, even heart failure.
According to Mirkin, the drug itself is not the problem — it’s how the body processes it. 5-Fu is poorly soluble, meaning less than 1% of it dissolves in many biological fluids. Most drugs need to dissolve in the bloodstream before they can travel through the body to enter cells. If a drug is poorly soluble, it clumps or retains a solid form, and the body cannot absorb it efficiently.
“We all know that chemotherapy is often horribly toxic,” Mirkin said. “But a lot of people don’t realize it’s also often poorly soluble, so we have to find ways to transform it into water soluble forms and deliver it effectively.”
The SNA Solution
To develop a more effective delivery system, Mirkin and his team turned to SNAs. Invented and developed by Mirkin at Northwestern, SNAs are globular nanostructures with a nanoparticle core surrounded by a dense shell of DNA or RNA. In previous studies, Mirkin discovered that cells recognize SNAs and invite them inside. In the new study, his team built new SNAs with the chemotherapy chemically incorporated into the DNA strands.
“Most cells have scavenger receptors on their surfaces,” Mirkin said. “But myeloid cells overexpress these receptors, so there are even more of them. If they recognize a molecule, then they will pull it into the cell. Instead of having to force their way into cells, SNAs are naturally taken up by these receptors.”
As Mirkin and his team suspected, the structural redesign completely changed how 5-Fu interacted with the cancer cells. Unlike with free-floating, unstructured chemotherapy molecules, the myeloid cells easily recognized and absorbed the SNA form. Once inside, enzymes broke down the DNA shell to release the drug molecules, which killed the cancer cell from within.
In the mouse experiments, the therapy eliminated the leukemia cells to near completion in the blood and spleen and significantly extended survival. And, because the SNAs selectively targeted AML cells, healthy tissues remained unharmed.
“Today’s chemotherapeutics kill everything they encounter,” Mirkin said. “So, they kill the cancer cells but also a lot of healthy cells. Our structural nanomedicine preferentially seeks out the myeloid cells. Instead of overwhelming the whole body with chemotherapy, it delivers a higher, more focused dose exactly where it’s needed.”
Next, Mirkin’s team plans to test the new strategy in a larger cohort of small animal models, then move to a larger animal model and, eventually, in human clinical trials, once funding is secured.
Reference: “Chemotherapeutic Spherical Nucleic Acids” by Taokun Luo, Young Jun Kim, Zhenyu Han, Jeongmin Hwang, Sneha Kumari, Vinzenz Mayer, Alex Cushing, Roger A. Romero and Chad A. Mirkin, 29 October 2025, ACS Nano.
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5c16609
Funding: National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
15 Comments
How far these tests and trials have come throughout all the past years since I was a child . I’m now in my 60s.
Nothing has been in vain because it’s only through the thousands of people who have done long drawn out tests and all in good corse of finding cancer cures.
So here today I see thers success for certain types of cancer and it’s going to save thousands of people. My grandmother died of stomach cancer almost 60 years ago as there was no cure, but today will give new hope to so many people to live on long after cancer diagnosis.
They now know this is usually from a bacterial infection of the stomach by H. pylori, which starts as a peptic ulcer. The ulcer can be cured by antibiotics and the cancer prevented, assuming the ulcer is cured in a timely manner. Peptic ulcers were suspected to be caused by a bacterial infection a long time ago, but the idea was strongly resisted. It took 3 more decades to prove, probably because they were making so much money on treatment. The link between H. pylori and peptic ulcers was proven in 1984 by Australians Dr. Barry J. Marshall and Dr. J. Robin Warren. Stomach cancer was then proven in 1994.
In the 1950s and 1960s, Dr. John Lykoudis, a Greek physician, treated patients with antibiotics for peptic ulcers, suspecting an infectious cause, but his ideas were largely dismissed by the medical community at the time, despite having great success treating it. A doctor would not be allowed to do that today. They can’t use antibiotics on anything unless they have strong cause to suspect bacterial infection. I believe this is by design, not legitimate risk of antibiotic resistance. Pharmaceutical companies lost a lot of money when ulcers were cured, and they lost more when chronic lower back pain was discovered to usually be chronic low level bacterial infection of the disks, requiring a long antibacterial treatment to cure. Then suddenly everywhere it was being pushed that doctors should not use antibiotics when a bacterial infection is not obvious. That makes no sense because that is not how you would get resistant bacteria. You get resistant bacteria from using too low a dose in a real bacterial infection or on someone with a weakened immune system. If the bacteria survives, it generally means the patient did not survive. Similarly, when treating animals, the bacteria kills the chicken or whatever, then spreads.
There is no way around it for humans. Doctors are not going to withhold treatment just because you have a weak immune system, nor should they. They just have to do a very good job of keeping that bacteria from infecting other people when someone dies of an infection despite treatment.
Please, please, please don’t let the current regime stop this important research. My daughter has Stage IV Metastatic Breast Cancer and she is trying to stay alive until the wonderful scientists find a cure.
This article doesn’t say the name of the drug..???
It does: 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu)
This article is a lie. There will never be a cure for cancer untill you take the profit out of being sick. The day we have universal, free health care is the day we will have a cure for cancer. This is too much profit keeping Americans sick, and addicted to big pharmas drugs. This artical is just big pharma gaslighting.
Lighten up, Francis.
Pull you head out before you can no longer breath!
I hope China jumps on this and funds the research. The world needs leadership in so many humanitarian areas, this being one.
10 years ago it was a drug 5000 times more effective, 5 years ago it was 10,000 times,…this is all BS, never see the light of day. False hopes as usual.
Said the clown
Some truly uninformed and needlessly cynical comments here. There have been amazing advances in cancer treatment in recent years. Of course, we’d be best off making sure our soil and food is free of heavy metals and tested by robust, unbiased government regulators, such as the FDA and EPA. Also, reducing stress, sugar and salt, and maintaining a rigorous exercise regime. Applying these already-existing tools would make our society much, much healthier and cancer-free. Scapegoating scientists, poll-takers, bureaucrats and other educated people never ends well, although Pol Pot and many others have engaged the tactic.
“truly uninformed”, aka typical American, and, I bet, a proud member o today’s GOP.
A pioneer in chemistry and nanomedicine, Mirkin is the George B. Rathmann Professor of Chemistry, Chemical and Biological Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering and Medicine at Northwestern, where he has appointments in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, McCormick School of Engineering and Feinberg School of Medicine. He also is the founding director of the International Institute for Nanotechnology and a member of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University.
WHAT A TALENTED MAN!
Congrats, Sir.
This will surely be the miracle go to drug for leukemia. Fenbendazole is out of patent so…
{o.o}