New Evidence for Controversial Theory That the Electron Is Composed of Two Particles

Electron's Dual Nature in Quantum Spin Liquid

Researchers at Princeton University conducted experiments on materials known as quantum spin liquids, finding evidence that the electrons in the quantum regime behave as if they are made up of two particles. Credit: Catherine Zandonella, Princeton University

New Evidence for Electron’s Dual Nature Found in a Quantum Spin Liquid

Results from a Princeton-led experiment support a controversial theory that the electron is composed of two particles.

A new discovery led by Princeton University could upend our understanding of how electrons behave under extreme conditions in quantum materials. The finding provides experimental evidence that this familiar building block of matter behaves as if it is made of two particles: one particle that gives the electron its negative charge and another that supplies its magnet-like property, known as spin.

“We think this is the first hard evidence of spin-charge separation,” said Nai Phuan Ong, Princeton’s Eugene Higgins Professor of Physics and senior author on the paper published this week in the journal Nature Physics.

The experimental results fulfill a prediction made decades ago to explain one of the most mind-bending states of matter, the quantum spin liquid. In all materials, the spin of an electron can point either up or down. In the familiar magnet, all of the spins uniformly point in one direction throughout the sample when the temperature drops below a critical temperature.

However, in spin liquid materials, the spins are unable to establish a uniform pattern even when cooled very close to absolute zero. Instead, the spins are constantly changing in a tightly coordinated, entangled choreography. The result is one of the most entangled quantum states ever conceived, a state of great interest to researchers in the growing field of quantum computing.

Thermal Conductivity in Quantum Spin Liquid State

The 3D color-plot, a composite of many experiments, shows how the thermal conductivity κxx (vertical axis) varies as a function of the magnetic field B (horizontal axis) and the temperature T (axis into the page). The oscillations provide evidence for spinons. Credit: Peter Czajka, Princeton University

To describe this behavior mathematically, Nobel prize-winning Princeton physicist Philip Anderson (1923-2020), who first predicted the existence of spin liquids in 1973, proposed an explanation: in the quantum regime an electron may be regarded as composed of two particles, one bearing the electron’s negative charge and the other containing its spin. Anderson called the spin-containing particle a spinon.

In this new study, the team searched for signs of the spinon in a spin liquid composed of ruthenium and chlorine atoms. At temperatures a fraction of a Kelvin above absolute zero (or roughly -452 degrees Fahrenheit) and in the presence of a high magnetic field, ruthenium chloride crystals enter the spin liquid state.

Graduate students Peter Czajka and Tong Gao, Ph.D. 2020, connected three highly sensitive thermometers to the crystal sitting in a bath maintained at temperatures close to absolute zero degrees Kelvin. They then applied the magnetic field and a small amount of heat to one crystal edge to measure its thermal conductivity, a quantity that expresses how well it conducts a heat current. If spinons were present, they should appear as an oscillating pattern in a graph of the thermal conductivity versus magnetic field.

The oscillating signal they were searching for was tiny — just a few hundredths of a degree change — so the measurements demanded an extraordinarily precise control of the sample temperature as well as careful calibrations of the thermometers in the strong magnetic field.

The team used the purest crystals available, ones grown at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) under the leadership of David Mandrus, materials science professor at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville, and Stephen Nagler, corporate research fellow in ORNL’s Neutron Scattering Division. The ORNL team has extensively studied the quantum spin liquid properties of ruthenium chloride.

In a series of experiments conducted over nearly three years, Czajka and Gao detected temperature oscillations consistent with spinons with increasingly higher resolution, providing evidence that the electron is composed of two particles consistent with Anderson’s prediction.

“People have been searching for this signature for four decades,” Ong said, “If this finding and the spinon interpretation are validated, it would significantly advance the field of quantum spin liquids.”

Czajka and Gao spent last summer confirming the experiments while under COVID-19 restrictions that required them to wear masks and maintain social distancing.

“From the purely experimental side,” Czajka said, “it was exciting to see results that in effect break the rules that you learn in elementary physics classes.”

Reference: “Oscillations of the thermal conductivity in the spin-liquid state of α-RuCl3” by Peter Czajka, Tong Gao, Max Hirschberger, Paula Lampen-Kelley, Arnab Banerjee, Jiaqiang Yan, David G. Mandrus, Stephen E. Nagler and N. P. Ong, 13 May 2021, Nature Physics.
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-021-01243-x

The experiments were performed in collaboration with Max Hirschberger, Ph.D. 2017 now at the University of Tokyo, Arnab Banerjee at Purdue University and ORNL, David Mandrus and Paula Lempen-Kelley at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville and ORNL, and Jiaqiang Yan and Stephen E. Nagler at ORNL. Funding at Princeton was provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation. The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation also supported the crystal growth program at the University of Tennessee.

6 Comments on "New Evidence for Controversial Theory That the Electron Is Composed of Two Particles"

  1. And what of positrons?, there would have to be 3 particles, spin plus unity -ve and +ve charges.

    What about the up-down quarks that give us protons with +ve or -ve charge and neutrons. This means the up & down quarks have 2/3 and -1/3 charges to sum up to 1 and 0 charge. And the antimatter version being upside down. How does nature have unit charge for electrons and positrons, but n1/3 charges for the nuclei parts?

    Interesting but confusing.

  2. … where is the second, there should be the third one, that would be very Tesla like, he probably has discovered that in some of his experiments, but was not ready for it…
    … yeah, lest wait for the third component…

  3. BibhutibhusanPatel | May 16, 2021 at 12:41 pm | Reply

    Spinon is unit spin magnètòn dèscrìbed as èlectròn’s maģnetism duè to spin.This can inteŕact with a hèàt partìcĺe and òscìllate
    in a màģñètic fièĺd as in the experiment usès ruthenium çhĺoŕidè cŕystal.Now, spin and chàŕgè have both sòlè ùniquè proporty of exìstançe, mass can nòt bè sepaŕàtèd.

  4. BibhutibhusanPatel | May 16, 2021 at 12:50 pm | Reply

    Spinon and chaŕgè of electron have sòle exìstance dùe to thèìr unique mass.


    Have you ever heard of the Janus electron???? Beginning at page 20 in the reference below, a whole new look on things emerges ….



Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.