In laboratory experiments, sweeteners impaired protein that rids the body of toxins and processes drugs.
Results from a new study suggest that two sugar substitutes disrupt the function of a protein that plays a vital role in liver detoxification and the metabolism of certain drugs. These sugar substitutes, also known as non-nutritive sweeteners, provide a sweet taste with few or no calories.
“With an estimated 40% of Americans regularly consuming non-nutritive sweeteners, it’s important to understand how they affect the body,” said Laura Danner, a doctoral student at the Medical College of Wisconsin. “In fact, many people don’t realize that these sweeteners are found in light or zero-sugar versions of yogurts and snack foods and even in non-food products like liquid medicines and certain cosmetics.”
Danner presented the new research at the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology annual meeting during the Experimental Biology (EB) 2022 meeting, which was held April 2-5, 2022, in Philadelphia.
In their new work, the researchers studied the non-nutritive sweeteners acesulfame potassium and sucralose using liver cells and cell-free assays, which allow the study of cellular processes such as transport.
They found that acesulfame potassium and sucralose inhibited the activity of P-glycoprotein (PGP), which is also known as multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1). PGP is part of a family of transporters that work together to cleanse the body of toxins, drugs, and drug metabolites.
“We observed that sweeteners impacted PGP activity in liver cells at concentrations expected through consumption of common foods and beverages, far below the recommended FDA maximum limits,” said Stephanie Olivier Van Stichelen, PhD, who leads the research team. “To our knowledge, we are the first group to decipher the molecular mechanism by which non-nutritive sweeteners impact detoxification in the liver.”
The experiments also showed that the sweeteners stimulate transport activity and likely bind to PGP, and thus compete with and inhibit the transport of other substrates such as xenobiotics, drugs and their metabolites, short-chain lipids, and bile acids.
Although the researchers caution that the study is preliminary and needs to be confirmed in preclinical and clinical studies, the findings suggest that non-nutritive sweeteners might be problematic for people who take medications that use PGP as a primary detoxification transporter. These include certain antidepressants, antibiotics and blood pressure medications.
“If future studies confirm that non-nutritive sweeteners impair the body’s detoxification process, it would be essential to study the potential interactions and determine safe levels of consumption for at-risk groups,” said Danner. “It might also be important to include specific amounts non-nutritive sweeteners included on food labels so that people can better track their intake.”
Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommends that non-nutritive sweeteners stay below an acceptable daily intake amount — the amount included in about 35 diet sodas for acesulfame potassium or eight diet sodas for sucralose per day — food manufacturers are only required to list them in the ingredients. They don’t have to indicate the amount of non-nutritive sweetener used in the product.
Next, the researchers plan to use more complex models of drug transport to determine the extent to which acesulfame potassium and sucralose might interfere with detoxification and drug metabolism. They are also studying mixes of these sweeteners, which would be more representative of how they are found in food products.
The researchers point out that because PGP is expressed at exchange surfaces throughout the body and plays an important part in maintaining systems like the blood–brain barrier, it will also be important to investigate how PGP inhibition could interfere with normal functioning of cells in other organs.
Laura Danner will present this research from 12:30–1:45 p.m. Tuesday, April 5, in Exhibit/Poster Hall A–B, Pennsylvania Convention Center (Poster Board Number A186) (abstract). Contact the media team for more information or to obtain a free press pass to attend the meeting.
Meeting: Experimental Biology 2022
I love this it really works!!
So, these researchers conclude that since two sweeteners they tested may affect the liver, all sweeteners must do the same. It sounds like flawed study logic to me.
I also would like to know the effect size. If my body can clear the NNS in an hour and the half-life of the toxin is two days, the NNS does not matter. If the toxin has a half-life of an hour and the NNS takes two days to clear, obviously that would be more concerning.
What do you recommend for diabetes to use in place of Splenda in their diets. Need to make changes asap.