Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Health»Artificial Sweeteners May Not Be Safe Sugar Alternatives – New Study Indicates Increased Cancer Risk
    Health

    Artificial Sweeteners May Not Be Safe Sugar Alternatives – New Study Indicates Increased Cancer Risk

    By PLOSApril 4, 2022No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Sugar Sweeteners Illustration
    Artificial sweeteners may not be safe sugar alternatives. Credit: Mathilde Touvier (CC-BY 4.0)

    Study suggests association between consuming artificial sweeteners and increased cancer risk.

    Artificial sweeteners reduce added sugar content and corresponding calories while maintaining sweetness. A study published on March 24th, 2022, in PLOS Medicine by Charlotte Debras and Mathilde Touvier at the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research (Inserm) and Sorbonne Paris Nord University, France and colleagues suggests that some artificial sweeteners are associated with increased cancer risk.

    Many food products and beverages containing artificial sweeteners are consumed by millions of people daily. However, the safety of these additives has been a subject of debate. To evaluate the potential carcinogenicity of artificial sweeteners, researchers analyzed data from 102,865 French adults participating in the NutriNet-Santé study. The NutriNet-Santé study is an ongoing web-based cohort initiated in 2009 by the Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN). Participants enroll voluntarily and self-report medical history, sociodemographic, diet, lifestyle, and health data. Researchers gathered data concerning artificial sweetener intake from 24-hour dietary records. After collecting cancer diagnosis information during follow-up, the researchers conducted statistical analyses to investigate the associations between artificial sweetener intakes and cancer risk. They also adjusted for a range of variables including age, sex, education, physical activity, smoking, body mass index, height, weight-gain during follow-up, diabetes, family history of cancer, as well as baseline intakes of energy, alcohol, sodium, saturated fatty acids, fiber, sugar, whole-grain foods, and dairy products.

    Increased Cancer Risk Linked to Aspartame and Acesulfame-K

    The researchers found that enrollees consuming larger quantities of artificial sweeteners, particularly aspartame and acesulfame-K, had higher risk of overall cancer compared to non-consumers (hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.25). Higher risks were observed for breast cancer and obesity-related cancers.

    The study had several important limitations; dietary intakes are self-reported. Selection bias may also have been a factor, as participants were more likely to be women, to have higher educational levels, and to exhibit health-conscious behaviors. The observational nature of the study also means that residual confounding is possible and reverse causality cannot be ruled out. Additional research will be required to confirm the findings and clarify the underlying mechanisms.

    According to the authors, “Our findings do not support the use of artificial sweeteners as safe alternatives for sugar in foods or beverages and provide important and novel information to address the controversies about their potential adverse health effects. While these results need to be replicated in other large-scale cohorts and underlying mechanisms clarified by experimental studies, they provide important and novel insights for the ongoing re-evaluation of food additive sweeteners by the European Food Safety Authority and other health agencies globally”.

    Debras adds, “Results from the NutriNet-Santé cohort (n=102,865) suggest that artificial sweeteners found in many food and beverage brands worldwide may be associated with increased cancer risk, in line with several experimental in vivo / in vitro studies. These findings provide novel information for the re-evaluation of these food additives by health agencies.”

    Reference: “Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study” by Charlotte Debras, Eloi Chazelas, Bernard Srour, Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo, Younes Esseddik, Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi, Cédric Agaësse, Alexandre De Sa, Rebecca Lutchia, Stéphane Gigandet, Inge Huybrechts, Chantal Julia, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Benjamin Allès, Valentina A. Andreeva, Pilar Galan, Serge Hercberg, Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy and Mathilde Touvier, 24 March 2022, PLOS Medicine.
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003950

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Artificial Sweeteners Cancer Food Science Nutrition PLOS Popular
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Common Food Preservatives Linked to Increased Risk of Cancer

    Study Confirms Sweeteners Do Not Spike Hunger Levels and Identifies Additional Health Benefits

    Beefing Up Immunity: Nutrient Found in Meat and Dairy Improves Cancer Defense

    New Study Alarms: Ultra-Processed Foods Linked to Increased Risk of Cancer & Death

    New, Low-Calorie Sweetener May Also Provide Health Benefits

    Ultra-Processed Foods Linked With Heart Disease, Bowel Cancer and Death

    People Who Eat Chili Pepper May Live Longer – Reduced Risk of Dying From Cardiovascular Disease or Cancer

    Researchers Warn: Common Food Additive – Banned in France but Allowed in the U.S. – Causes Adverse Health Effects in Mice

    Study Finds Cutting Back on Red Meat Has Little Impact on Health

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Largest-Ever Study Finds Medicinal Cannabis Ineffective for Anxiety, Depression, PTSD

    250-Million-Year-Old Egg Solves One of Evolution’s Biggest Mysteries

    Living With Roommates Might Be Changing Your Gut Microbiome Without You Knowing

    Century-Old Cleaning Chemical Linked to 500% Increased Risk of Parkinson’s Disease

    What if Your Memories Never Happened? Physicists Take a New Look at the Boltzmann Brain Paradox

    One of the Universe’s Largest Stars May Be Getting Ready To Explode

    Scientists Discover Enzyme That Could Supercharge Ozempic-Like Weight Loss Drugs

    Popular Sweetener Linked to DNA Damage – “It’s Something You Should Not Be Eating”

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • The Most Elusive Number in Physics Just Got Even More Mysterious
    • Scientists Uncover Hidden Trigger Behind Stem Cell Aging
    • Scientists Discover Coral Reefs Are Teeming With Previously Unknown Life
    • Scientists Find Way to Reverse Fatty Liver Disease Without Changing Diet
    • Could Humans Regrow Limbs? New Study Reveals Promising Genetic Pathway
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.