Metallic hydrogen is one of the rarest materials on Earth, yet more than 80 percent of planets—including Jupiter, Saturn, and hundreds of extrasolar planets—are composed of this exotic form of matter.
Its abundance in our solar system—despite its rarity on Earth—makes metallic hydrogen an intriguing focus for researchers at the University of Rochester’s Laboratory of Laser Energetics (LLE) who study planet formation and evolution, including how planets both inside and outside our solar system form magnetic shields.
“Metallic hydrogen is the most abundant form of matter in our planetary system,” says Mohamed Zaghoo, a research associate at the LLE. “It’s a shame we don’t have it naturally here on earth, but on Jupiter, there are oceans of metallic hydrogen. We want to find out how these oceans give rise to Jupiter’s enormous magnetic field.” Zaghoo and Gilbert ‘Rip’ Collins, a professor of mechanical engineering and of physics and director of Rochester’s high-energy-density physics program, studied the conductivity of metallic hydrogen to further unravel the mysteries of the dynamo effect—the mechanism that generates magnetic fields on planets including Earth. They published their findings in the Astrophysical Journal.
Creating metallic hydrogen at the LLE
Every element acts differently under intense pressure and temperature. Heating water, for example, generates a gas in the form of water vapor; freezing it creates solid ice. Hydrogen is normally a gas, but at high temperatures and pressures—the conditions that exist within planets like Jupiter—hydrogen takes on the properties of a liquid metal and behaves like an electrical conductor.
Although scientists theorized for decades about the existence of metallic hydrogen, it was nearly impossible to create on Earth. “The conditions to create metallic hydrogen are so extreme that, although metallic hydrogen is abundant in our solar system, it has only been created in a few places on earth,” Zaghoo says. “The LLE is one of those places.”
At the LLE, researchers use the powerful OMEGA laser to fire pulses at a hydrogen capsule. The laser impinges on the sample, developing a high-pressure, high-temperature condition that allows the tightly bound hydrogen atoms to break. When this happens, hydrogen is transformed from its gaseous state to a shiny liquid state, much like the element mercury.
Understanding the dynamo effect
By studying the conductivity of metallic hydrogen, Zaghoo and Collins are able to build a more accurate model of the dynamo effect—a process where the kinetic energy of conducting moving fluids converts to magnetic energy. Gas giants like Jupiter have a very powerful dynamo, but the mechanism is also present deep within Earth, in the outer core. This dynamo creates our own magnetic field, making our planet habitable by shielding us from harmful solar particles. Researchers can map the earth’s magnetic field, but, because the earth has a magnetic crust, satellites cannot see far enough into our planet to observe the dynamo in action. Jupiter, on the other hand, does not have a crust barrier. This makes it relatively easier for satellites—like NASA’s Juno space probe, currently in orbit around Jupiter—to observe the planet’s deep structures, Collins says. “It is very humbling to be able to characterize one of the most interesting states of matter, liquid metallic hydrogen, here in the laboratory, use this knowledge to interpret satellite data from a space probe, and then apply this all to extrasolar planets.”
Zaghoo and Collins focused their research on the relationship between metallic hydrogen and the onset of the dynamo action, including the depth where the dynamo of Jupiter forms. They found that the dynamo of gas giants like Jupiter is likely to originate closer to the surface—where the metallic hydrogen is most conductive—than the dynamo of Earth. This data, combined with revelations from Juno, can be incorporated into simulated models that will allow for a more complete picture of the dynamo effect.
“Part of the mandate for the Juno mission was to try to understand Jupiter’s magnetic field,” Zaghoo says. “A key complementary piece to the Juno data is just how conductive hydrogen is at varying depths inside the planet. We need to build this into our models in order to make better predictions about current planet composition and evolution.”
Better understanding the planets in our own solar system also provides more insight into the magnetic shielding of exoplanets outside of our solar system—and may help determine the possibility of life on other planets. Researches have long thought that planets with magnetic fields are better able to sustain gaseous atmospheres and therefore are more likely to harbor life, Zaghoo says. “Dynamo theory and magnetic fields are key conditions of habitability. There are hundreds of exoplanets discovered outside our solar system every year and we think many of these planets are like Jupiter and Saturn. We cannot go to these planets yet, but we can apply our knowledge about the super giants in our own solar system to make models of what these planets might be like.”
Reference: “Size and Strength of Self-excited Dynamos in Jupiter-like Extrasolar Planets” by Mohamed Zaghoo and G. W. Collins, 18 July 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.
Life? Please, do expound. What is life? How does it spring forth from inanimate matter? Doesn’t life come from previous life? Is it only necessary for a ‘soup’ of organic molecules to be arranged just so-so, then… vuala, LIFE!
This question seems to be always sidestepped here at scitechdaily.com
Here it crops up again in this article. A pre-supposition that this THEORY is true, that the cosmos is teeming with life. Just another silly pre-conceived matter-of-fact assumption thrown out, as if ‘life’ exists elsewhere in the Universe.
To this date, with all of our astronomical detecting instruments, not one hint of a SPECK of life has been found elsewhere.
From the article:
“Researches have long thought that planets with magnetic fields are better able to sustain gaseous atmospheres, and therefore are more likely to harbor life, Zaghoo says.”
Okay, Mr. Zaghoo, please tell me, how can another body in the Universe be able to harbor life? Or, are you only GUESSING, and JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS with that statement? Thank you.
Mr. Shelby,the statement about magnetic fields is simple. If a planet is found it is studied.Science does not have a complete idea of how life forms, finding another planet that is proven to harbor life would give more information as to how life arises on planets. If no other life is found, then life is unique to earth, and no big deal. Each article on this page has source material so it can be looked at by a different set of eyes and interpreted. Science is built on observation, theories are tested observations. Should a person come up with information that better expalins a given idea, it is repeatedly tested and adopted.Yes, life has not been found elsewhere. I see a lot of hostility in your response, so I dont see the author responding.
Are you religious?
Are you religious Darin?
if assumptions about life elsewhere in the universe are hard to believe for certain people because it cant be proven thereby making the assumption or holding the belief that our planet is the only habitat for life would seem to be even more absurd. what would be the odds of that given the vastness and variability of the cosmos. all of this begs the question what scientific proof is there for the assumption that our planet is the only habitat and therefore source for life in the universe? if you have a conviction for one point of view you must have proof that the opposite is false or true. In other words if you believe we are alone, what proof can you present to support your belief, what do you base it on FAITH? how can you prove that others don’t exist? For that matter then how can you prove that a superior cosmic intelligence doesn’t exist either, what proof do you have? opposition a swell as agreement has to be based on something other than faith