Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Physics»Scientists Discover a New “Magic Number” That Could Rewrite the Rules of Nuclear Physics
    Physics

    Scientists Discover a New “Magic Number” That Could Rewrite the Rules of Nuclear Physics

    By Institute of Modern PhysicsJuly 16, 20255 Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Atomic Energy Concept
    Researchers at the Institute of Modern Physics have, for the first time, precisely measured the mass of the elusive, neutron-deficient isotope silicon-22, uncovering evidence that its proton number 14 behaves as a new “magic” shell closure. Credit: Stock

    Physicists have discovered that silicon-22 reveals a new proton magic number offering critical insights into nuclear structure and the forces shaping the universe’s rarest atoms.

    In nuclear physics, “magic numbers” refer to certain quantities of protons or neutrons that make an atomic nucleus significantly more stable. Identifying these special numbers plays a key role in helping scientists uncover how atomic nuclei are structured.

    While the magic numbers linked to stable, long-lasting isotopes have been understood for decades, the situation is less clear for highly unstable, short-lived isotopes. Studying these rare and fleeting forms of matter gives scientists valuable clues about how nuclear structures behave under extreme conditions. These discoveries not only offer insight into how the elements in the Universe were formed but also enhance our knowledge of the forces that hold atomic nuclei together.

    In a recent advancement, scientists at the Institute of Modern Physics (IMP) under the Chinese Academy of Sciences have achieved a first-of-its-kind measurement of the mass of silicon-22. This isotope is both extremely unstable and lacking in neutrons. Their work has revealed that in silicon-22, the proton count of 14 behaves as a newly confirmed magic number.

    Their findings were recently published in the journal Physical Review Letters.

    The Shell Model and Known Magic Numbers

    Atomic nuclei are composed of protons and neutrons. When the number of protons or neutrons reaches a “magic number”, such as 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, or 126, the nucleus becomes more stable. Maria Goeppert Mayer and J. Hans D. Jensen explained this phenomenon in the 1940s–1950s through the nuclear shell model, for which they were awarded the 1963 Nobel Prize in Physics.

    Structural Schematic Diagram of Silicon 22 and Its Mirror Nucleus Oxygen 22
    Through mass measurements of silicon-22 combined with theoretical calculations, researchers have revealed that silicon-22 possesses a double-magic structure similar to that of oxygen-22, while also exhibiting slight symmetry breaking with a more extended proton spatial distribution. Credit: IMP

    In recent years, studies of exotic nuclei far from the valley of stability—the region on a nuclide chart where stable isotopes are found—have identified new neutron magic numbers, such as 14, 16, 32, and 34. However, new proton magic numbers remain rare in experimental observations.

    Previously, scientists discovered that in oxygen-22 (14 neutrons and 8 protons), the neutron number 14 exhibits magic characteristics. Based on nuclear mirror symmetry, theorists predicted that proton number 14 should also be a magic number in its mirror nucleus, silicon-22 (8 neutrons and 14 protons). However, generating and measuring silicon-22 is extremely challenging due to its low yields and short half-life, leaving this theoretical prediction unverified until now.

    Advanced Mass Spectroscopy at IMP

    Using improved Bρ-defined isochronous mass spectroscopy, researchers at IMP successfully measured the ground-state mass of silicon-22 at the Cooling Storage Ring of the Heavy Ion Research Facility in Lanzhou. They also improved the mass precision of their previously measured silicon-23 by nearly sevenfold.

    Their results show that silicon-22 has a positive two-proton separation energy—in other words, it doesn’t spontaneously lose two protons. This confirms its status as a proton drip-line nucleus without two-proton radioactivity, thereby resolving a long-standing debate in nuclear physics.

    Using the new mass value, the team calculated the proton pairing energy of silicon-22 and compared it with the neutron pairing energy of its mirror nucleus oxygen-22, revealing the new proton magic number 14. This finding is supported by the Gamow shell model.

    Although silicon-22 exhibits double-magic properties similar to oxygen-22, the study found that its proton spatial distribution is more spread compared with the neutron distribution of oxygen-22, exhibiting a slight symmetry breaking.

    This study deepens our understanding of exotic nuclear structures and provides new insights into nucleon interactions and the existence of extremely exotic nuclei.

    Reference: “Z=14 Magicity Revealed by the Mass of the Proton Dripline Nucleus Si22” by Y. M. Xing, Y. F. Luo, Y. H. Zhang, M. Wang, X. H. Zhou, J. G. Li, K. H. Li, Q. Yuan, Y. F. Niu, J. Y. Guo, J. C. Pei, F. R. Xu, G. de Angelis, Yu. A. Litvinov, K. Blaum, I. Tanihata, T. Yamaguchi, Y. Yu, X. Zhou, H. S. Xu, Z. Y. Chen, R. J. Chen, H. Y. Deng, C. Y. Fu, W. W. Ge, W. J. Huang, H. Y. Jiao, H. F. Li, T. Liao, J. Y. Shi, M. Si, M. Z. Sun, P. Shuai, X. L. Tu, Q. Wang, X. Xu, X. L. Yan, Y. J. Yuan and M. Zhang, 2 July 2025, Physical Review Letters.
    DOI: 10.1103/ffwt-n7yc

    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China, the Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS, and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS, among others.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Chinese Academy of Sciences Isotopes Nuclear Physics Particle Physics Popular
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    After 50 Years, a Neutrino Detector Finally Catches Elusive Ghost Particles

    Aluminum-20: The Self-Destructing Atom Scientists Never Saw Coming

    Physicists Unlock New Path to Weighing the Universe’s “Ghost Particle”

    Physicists Unravel Mystery of Mercury’s Bizarre Nuclear Fission

    Inside the Proton Halo: Precision Measurements Unravel Nuclear Puzzles

    Discovery of a New Subatomic Particle: The X(1880) Resonance

    Redefining Nuclear Magic: Physicists Have Discovered Two New Isotopes

    Directly Challenging Our Understanding of Nuclear Force: Scientists Discover Strongest Isospin Mixing Ever Observed

    Scientists Propose New Source for Rare Subatomic “Bullets”

    5 Comments

    1. Bao-hua ZHANG on July 16, 2025 4:29 pm

      Scientists Discover a New “Magic Number” That Could Rewrite the Rules of Nuclear Physics.
      very good.

      Scientists, please think deeply:
      If rules can be rewritten, is your rule pseudoscience or is your observation and understanding incorrect?

      Many people do not believe that so-called peer-reviewed publications (such as Physical Review series) have been systematically disseminating pseudoscience. If the researcher believes the evidence, please browse https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/1925124100134790589 and https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/1928738508329169149 (If the link is not blocked).

      Reply
    2. Daniel Martin on July 17, 2025 4:13 am

      Man I jumped on this article absolutely certain it was going to be 42. 😁

      Reply
    3. Ted Casler on July 18, 2025 12:25 pm

      I am not a professional scientist but just a general, layman reader of science. I do have a question on this article in that it states “This isotope is both extremely unstable and lacking in neutrons” in reference to Silicon 22. With Silicon having 14 protons, wouldn’t Silicon 22 have 8 neutrons?

      Reply
      • jack smith on July 18, 2025 3:44 pm

        relative lack, not lacking completely. more protons than neutrons is generally unstable. see https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/ChemPRIME_(Moore_et_al.)/19%3A_Nuclear_Chemistry/19.08%3A_Nuclear_Stability

        Reply
    4. Ted Casler on July 19, 2025 1:12 pm

      Thank you for your reply. The article you link to explains it well.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    New Study Reveals Why Ozempic Works Better for Some People Than Others

    Climate Change Is Altering a Key Greenhouse Gas in a Way Scientists Didn’t Expect

    New Study Suggests Gravitational Waves May Have Created Dark Matter

    Scientists Discover Why the Brain Gets Stuck in Schizophrenia

    Scientists Engineer “Tumor-Eating” Bacteria That Devour Cancer From Within

    Even “Failed” Diets May Deliver Long-Term Health Gains, Study Finds

    NIH Scientists Discover Powerful New Opioid That Relieves Pain Without Dangerous Side Effects

    Collapsing Plasma May Hold the Key to Cosmic Magnetism

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • The Protein “Sabotaging” Aging Muscle Recovery Could Be Key to Surviving Aging
    • This Diet–Gut Interaction Could Transform Fat Into a Calorie-Burning Machine
    • Why Some People Reach 100: New Study Reveals Key Biological Differences
    • This Is How Ovarian Cancer Spreads Before Doctors Can Detect
    • Scientists Discover Hidden Virus Linked to Colorectal Cancer
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.