Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Physics»Physicists Unravel Mystery of Mercury’s Bizarre Nuclear Fission
    Physics

    Physicists Unravel Mystery of Mercury’s Bizarre Nuclear Fission

    By Institute of Science TokyoJune 27, 20251 Comment4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Particle Collision Nuclear Fusion Energy
    Using a new five-dimensional Langevin framework, an international team has dynamically replicated the puzzling double-humped fragment masses and kinetic energies observed in medium-mass mercury isotopes, revealing that nuclear shell effects endure even at unexpectedly high excitation energies. (Artist’s concept). Credit: Shutterstock

    A five-dimensional model has successfully predicted the asymmetric fission of mercury isotopes, offering new insights into nuclear fission processes beyond the well-studied elements uranium and plutonium.

    A five-dimensional (5D) Langevin model developed by an international team of researchers, including scientists from Science Tokyo, has accurately reproduced complex fission fragment distributions and kinetic energies in medium-mass mercury isotopes (180Hg and 190Hg). The model successfully captures the unusual “double-humped” mass distribution seen in mercury-180 and reveals how nuclear shell effects influence fission dynamics, even at higher excitation energies than previously assumed. This work deepens our understanding of nuclear fission in the sub-lead region.

    Nuclear fission, the process in which an atomic nucleus splits into smaller parts, is a key phenomenon in nuclear physics. While the fission of heavy elements like uranium and plutonium has been extensively studied, lighter nuclei such as mercury (Hg) behave in ways that are not well explained by existing models.

    Experiments have shown that 180Hg undergoes an unusual type of asymmetric fission, producing fragments of very different sizes. These results challenge current theories and point to the importance of understanding how nuclear structure affects fission in elements with atomic numbers below 82.

    A collaborative five-dimensional solution

    To better understand the unusual fission behavior of mercury isotopes, an international research team led by Associate Professor Chikako Ishizuka from the Institute of Zero-Carbon Energy at the Institute of Science Tokyo (Science Tokyo), Japan, developed a five-dimensional (5D) Langevin model. Their study, published online in Physical Review C on May 20, 2025, provides accurate predictions of fragment distributions and total kinetic energy (TKE), and was selected as an Editor’s Suggestion by the journal.

    The study was a collaborative effort and included Dr. F. A. Ivanyuk from the Institute for Nuclear Research Ukraine; Professor C. Schmitt from the University of Strasbourg, France; and Researcher Satoshi Chiba from NAT Co., Ltd., Japan, as co-authors.

    Unlike static models, the Langevin model follows the changing shape of the nucleus in real time, from its initial equilibrium state to the point of scission, where it splits into smaller fission fragments. “Describing the fission of actinides like uranium is not enough to understand the full picture,” says Ishizuka. “We need consistent models that work for other nuclei too, especially lighter ones like Hg that behave differently.”

    Realistic simulation of fission fragment distributions

    The team successfully modeled the fission of two Hg isotopes: 180Hg produced from the collision of 36Ar and 144Sm, and 190Hg from 36Ar and 154Sm. For both, they calculated the distribution of fission fragment masses and their TKEs. The model was designed to simulate nuclear fission more realistically by considering both the macroscopic, large-scale, liquid-drop-like motion and microscopic shell structure effects.

    Modeling Asymmetric Fission of Mercury Isotopes
    The proposed five-dimensional Langevin approach predicts released energy in asymmetric fission with remarkable precision and accuracy, which is based on the role of shell effects and multichance fission. Credit: Institute of Science Tokyo

    A key improvement was the use of a “soft wall” at the boundaries of the deformation space, which accurately simulates how the shape of the nucleus evolves during fission. The model also accounted for how shell effects change with increasing excitation energy, an aspect that previous models often oversimplified.

    Validating predictions with experimental data

    The simulation results showed strong agreement with experimental data for both the mass number distributions and the TKE of fission fragments. In the case of 180Hg, the model reproduced the unusual double-humped mass pattern seen in experiments. A key finding of the study is that shell effects persist even at higher excitation energies of 40–50 MeV, where they were previously thought to vanish.

    The model also accounted for multichance fission, a process where the nucleus emits neutrons before it undergoes fission. They found that while this process has only a minor effect on fragment mass distributions at low excitation energies, it significantly impacts the TKE, making it a valuable indicator for studying multichance fission.

    Overall, these findings provide new insights into the fission process with important implications for fundamental research. “The calculations presented in this work confirm that our 5D Langevin approach is a reliable tool for the theoretical predictions of the fission process observables,” concludes Ishizuka.

    Reference: “Shell effects and multichance fission in the sub-lead region” by F. A. Ivanyuk, C. Schmitt, C. Ishizuka and S. Chiba, 20 May 2025, Physical Review C.
    DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.111.054620

    Funding: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Isotopes Mercury Nuclear Energy Nuclear Physics Particle Physics
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Aluminum-20: The Self-Destructing Atom Scientists Never Saw Coming

    Scientists Discover a New “Magic Number” That Could Rewrite the Rules of Nuclear Physics

    Physicists Unlock New Path to Weighing the Universe’s “Ghost Particle”

    Scientists Create Ultra-Rare Hydrogen-6 Isotope, Defying Nuclear Physics

    Ghost Particles on Patrol: Antimatter Detector Revolutionizes Nuclear Reactor Monitoring

    Unleashing Atomic Power: Record-Breaking 10.4kW Uranium Beam Reveals New Isotopes

    Science Made Simple: What Is Nuclear Fission?

    High-Energy Collisions Unveil New Clues to the Universe’s Origins

    Inside the Proton Halo: Precision Measurements Unravel Nuclear Puzzles

    1 Comment

    1. Bao-hua ZHANG on June 29, 2025 4:18 pm

      A five-dimensional model has successfully predicted the asymmetric fission of mercury isotopes, offering new insights into nuclear fission processes beyond the well-studied elements uranium and plutonium. Their study, published online in Physical Review C on May 20, 2025, provides accurate predictions of fragment distributions and total kinetic energy (TKE), and was selected as an Editor’s Suggestion by the journal.

      Please ask researchers to think deeply:
      1. Why is the result you observed asymmetric?
      2. Will your observation behavior and the environment in which the object you are observing affect your observation results?

      My SciTechDaily comments are often blocked.

      My theory is suppressed by so-called official publications of physics and science. Few one interaction with me – this fool. Whether it is foolish or honest, researchers only need to answer one question to the public and the so-called peer-reviewed publications:

      Two sets of cobalt-60 rotating in opposite directions, if they exhibit asymmetry, are they two objects that are mirror images of each other?

      YES or NO.

      Ask the researchers:
      1. What can scientific researches and observations change?
      3. How should we understand the results observed in scientific research and describe and utilize them?

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    First-of-Its-Kind Discovery: Homer’s Iliad Found Embedded in a 1,600-Year-Old Egyptian Mummy

    Beyond Inflammation: Scientists Uncover New Cause of Persistent Rheumatoid Arthritis

    A Simple Molecule Could Unlock Safer, Easier Weight Loss

    Scientists Just Built a Quantum Battery That Charges Almost Instantly

    Researchers Unveil Groundbreaking Sustainable Solution to Vitamin B12 Deficiency

    Millions of People Have Osteopenia Without Realizing It – Here’s What You Need To Know

    Researchers Discover Boosting a Single Protein Helps the Brain Fight Alzheimer’s

    World-First Study Reveals Human Hearts Can Regenerate After a Heart Attack

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Physicists Propose Strange Experiment Where Time Goes Quantum
    • Scientists Flip Immune System “Switch,” Uncover Surprising Path To Stop Gut Inflammation
    • Magnesium Magic: New Drug Melts Fat Even on a High-Fat, High-Sugar Diet
    • Weight-Loss Drugs Like Ozempic May Come With an Unexpected Cost
    • After Decades, MIT Researchers Capture the First 3D Atomic View of a Mysterious Material
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.