The Invisible Assault: How COVID-19 Clandestinely Ravages the Heart

COVID Virus Heart Damage Art Concept

A study finds that SARS-CoV-2 can cause heart damage indirectly through systemic inflammation, revealing a new understanding of cardiovascular complications from COVID-19 and suggesting potential anti-inflammatory treatments. Credit: SciTechDaily.com

NIH-supported research shows that the virus that causes COVID-19 can damage the heart without directly infecting heart tissue.

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, can damage the heart even without directly infecting the heart tissue, a National Institutes of Health-supported study has found. The research, published in the journal Circulation, specifically looked at damage to the hearts of people with SARS-CoV2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a serious lung condition that can be fatal. However, researchers said the findings could have relevance to organs beyond the heart and also to viruses other than SARS-CoV-2.

Investigating the Cause of Heart Damage

Scientists have long known that COVID-19 increases the risk of heart attack, stroke, and Long COVID, and prior imaging research has shown that over 50% of people who get COVID-19 experience some inflammation or damage to the heart. What scientists did not know is whether the damage occurs because the virus infects the heart tissue itself, or because of systemic inflammation triggered by the body’s well-known immune response to the virus.

“This was a critical question and finding the answer opens up a whole new understanding of the link between this serious lung injury and the kind of inflammation that can lead to cardiovascular complications,” said Michelle Olive, Ph.D., associate director of the Basic and Early Translational Research Program at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), part of NIH. “The research also suggests that suppressing the inflammation through treatments might help minimize these complications.”

Research Findings and Potential Treatments

To reach their findings, the researchers focused on immune cells known as cardiac macrophages, which normally perform a critical role in keeping the tissue healthy but can turn inflammatory in response to injury such as heart attack or heart failure. The researchers analyzed heart tissue specimens from 21 patients who died from SARS-CoV-2-associated ARDS and compared them with specimens from 33 patients who died from non-COVID-19 causes. They also infected mice with SARS-CoV-2 to follow what happened to the macrophages after infection.

In both humans and mice, they found the SARS-CoV-2 infection increased the total number of cardiac macrophages and also caused them to shift from their normal routine and become inflammatory.

When macrophages are no longer doing their normal jobs, which includes sustaining the metabolism of the heart and clearing out harmful bacteria or other foreign agents, they weaken the heart and the rest of the body, said Matthias Nahrendorf, M.D., Ph.D., professor of Radiology at Harvard Medical School and senior author on the study.

The researchers then designed a study in mice to test whether the response they observed happened because SARS-CoV-2 was infecting the heart directly, or because the SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lungs was severe enough to render the heart macrophages more inflammatory. This study mimicked the lung inflammation signals, but without the presence of the actual virus. The result: even in the absence of a virus, the mice showed immune responses strong enough to produce the same heart macrophage shift the researchers observed both in the patients who died of COVID-19 and the mice infected with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

“What this study shows is that after a COVID infection, the immune system can inflict remote damage on other organs by triggering serious inflammation throughout the body – and this is in addition to damage the virus itself has directly inflicted on the lung tissue,” said Nahrendorf. “These findings can also be applied more generally, as our results suggest that any severe infection can send shockwaves through the whole body.”

The research team also found that blocking the immune response with a neutralizing antibody in the mice stopped the flow of inflammatory cardiac macrophages and preserved cardiac function. While they have yet to test this in humans, Nahrendorf said a treatment like this could be used as a preventive measure to help COVID-19 patients with pre-existing conditions, or people who are likely to have more severe outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 associated ARDS.

Reference: “Virus-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Causes Cardiomyopathy Through Eliciting Inflammatory Responses in the Heart” by Jana Grune, Geetika Bajpai, Pervin Tülin Ocak, Eva Kaufmann, Kyle Mentkowksi, Steffen Pabel, Nina Kumowski, Fadi E. Pulous, Kim A. Tran, David Rohde, Shuang Zhang, Yoshiko Iwamoto, Gregory R. Wojtkiewicz, Claudio Vinegoni, Ursula Green, Filip K. Swirski, James R. Stone, Jochen K. Lennerz, Maziar Divangahi, Maarten Hulsmans and Matthias Nahrendorf, 20 March 2024, Circulation.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066433

Funding: This study was supported by NHLBI grants: HL139598, HL142494, HL155097, and HL149647.

7 Comments on "The Invisible Assault: How COVID-19 Clandestinely Ravages the Heart"

  1. FrequentFlyer | April 2, 2024 at 7:10 am | Reply

    So I’ve also reviewed research showing similar issues but the research and studies I have read have one key difference versus these.

    The research I read showed the heart damage in patients that had been vaccinated and the damage and risk was greater for patients who had additional boosters.

    So I see no mention in this article of the subjects/patients vaccination status.
    By design, just coincidence, or a simple omission?

    • IME, every piece of “research” regarding covid has been placed for us to see and in no way reflects any truth…. hopefully three or four generations from now, the truth will come out in the wash.

    • Someone Who Readsthearticle | April 3, 2024 at 6:37 am | Reply

      The mice were not vaccinated. The study conclusions also note this: “Our clinical data do not include potential effects of COVID-19 vaccines because all human speci-mens were collected before vaccinations became avail-able.”

      So, there was no omission. Maybe you should read the research before putting your prejudices out there for the world to see.

      • FrequentFlyer | April 4, 2024 at 7:52 am | Reply

        Did you read the whole study?

        The study was done September – December 2019.
        The WHO didnt even classify COVID until Jan 10 2020.

        So how did they perform a “study” on the virus and its effects before it was even known and classified?

        Also this study was done on 33 people such a small sample that it cannot statistically prove anything.

        Maybe you should do your “research” before coming on here and berating other, it just makes you look like a fool.

      • FrequentFlyer | April 4, 2024 at 7:52 am | Reply

        Did you read the whole study?

        The study was done September – December 2019.
        The WHO didnt even classify COVID until Jan 10 2020.

        So how did they perform a “study” on the virus and its effects before it was even known and classified?

        Also this study was done on 33 people such a small sample that it cannot statistically prove anything.

        Maybe you should do your “research” before coming on here and berating other.

  2. Pshhht, it’s the vax, but don’t tell anyone.

    • Someone Who Readsthearticle | April 3, 2024 at 6:39 am | Reply

      Neither the humans nor the mice were vaccinated. Take your conspiracy theory elsewhere.

Leave a comment

Email address is optional. If provided, your email will not be published or shared.