Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Health»5 Things Experts Say You’re Getting Wrong About Protein
    Health

    5 Things Experts Say You’re Getting Wrong About Protein

    By Rachel Tompa, Stanford UniversityApril 11, 20264 Comments9 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Man Biting Raw Beef Steak Meat
    Protein has become a heavily marketed nutrient, with social media and updated guidelines encouraging higher intake, but experts say the science hasn’t shifted as dramatically as the hype suggests. Credit: Shutterstock

    Protein is essential but widely overemphasized; most people already get enough, and balance matters more than excess.

    Walk through a grocery store today, and you will likely see protein added to everything from potato chips and pastries to bottled water. Products that once had little connection to nutrition trends are now marketed as protein-rich options.

    This surge reflects the rise of “protein-maxxing,” a social media-driven push to increase protein intake at every opportunity. The trend has gained further traction as federal dietary guidelines now highlight meat and dairy consumption and recommend increasing protein intake by 50% to 100% compared to earlier guidelines.

    But is all this extra protein necessary? Should carbohydrates be replaced with steak?

    “Protein has gotten the kind of treatment that low-fat food did in the ’90s—the SnackWell’s phenomenon. We all have given protein a health halo,” said Marily Oppezzo, PhD, a dietician and instructor of medicine at the Stanford Prevention Research Center. “Protein intake is important. Just not as magical-fixer-fountain-of-instant-awesome as Instagram would tell you.”

    To separate fact from hype, Stanford Medicine experts reviewed the science behind protein and current dietary advice.

    1. Protein intake fuels the creation of important bodily proteins.

    Despite conflicting messages, one point is clear: protein is essential. Along with carbohydrates and fat, it is one of the three macronutrients that supply calories. Every calorie you consume comes from one of these three sources.

    Marily Oppezzo, Jonathan Long and Christopher Gardner
    Marily Oppezzo, Jonathan Long, and Christopher Gardner. Credit: Stanford University

    Protein plays a critical role throughout the body. At a basic level, it provides the raw materials needed to build the body’s own proteins, which support nearly every biological process.

    “Protein can take the form of your muscles, your hair, your skin—everything has protein in it,” said Jonathan Long, PhD, an associate professor of pathology. “And you can’t get those constituents from fat or carbohydrates alone.”

    Our bodies’ proteins — just the same as dietary proteins — are made up of strings of molecules called amino acids. There are 20 different amino acids, some of which we can synthesize from other compounds. But we must get nine of these, also called essential amino acids, from our diet. We simply can’t build them out of other components.

    When you eat dietary proteins, your body breaks down those long strings of amino acids into their component parts, which it then uses to build new proteins your body needs. Imagine pulling all the beads off of a necklace and then using those beads to make new kinds of jewelry.

    2. For some people, protein amounts are important for muscle retention.

    Until just a few months ago, the federal RDA of dietary protein for adults was 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight. For a 150-pound adult, that’s around 55 grams of protein a day, or the equivalent of an 8-ounce steak. The newly revised dietary guidelines instead recommend 1.2 to 1.6 grams per kilogram, raising that 150-pound person’s recommendation to 80 to 110 grams a day.

    That’s quite a jump — so what actually changed with the science? Nothing, said Christopher Gardner, PhD, the director of nutrition studies at the Stanford Prevention Research Center.

    “Were we really off by that much? What new evidence became available to show that we were off by that much? There really isn’t any,” Gardner said. “Protein has become one of the single most heavily marketed products I’ve ever seen. Everything is marketed with protein in it.”

    Oppezzo’s view is slightly more nuanced. She’s concerned about the protein intake of adults over 40 and the growing segment of the population taking medications to lose weight. For these two groups, there is evidence that eating more dietary protein than 0.8 grams per kilogram can help stave off some of the muscle loss that commonly accompanies aging and weight loss.

    For individuals with a body mass index above 30, protein needs are calculated differently. Instead of using total body weight, an “adjusted body weight” is used because lean tissue requires energy to maintain. For those actively losing weight, Oppezzo recommends about 1.6 grams per kilogram of adjusted body weight to help preserve muscle.

    However, Oppezzo points out that resistance training is far more important than what you eat to maintain your muscles. One of her mentors, McMaster University nutrition researcher Stuart Phillips, PhD, likes to say that protein isn’t the cake, exercise is — protein is only a thin layer of frosting on the cake of resistance training.

    “The biggest thing that stops muscle loss is strength training,” Oppezzo said. “What higher protein adds to that is pretty small potatoes.”

    3. Maybe there wasn’t a protein intake problem to begin with.

    The difference between the old and new dietary guidelines could be moot, because Americans are eating plenty of protein already. According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, adult men in the U.S. are eating around 90 to 100 grams of protein a day, and women are getting 65 to 75 grams. That’s already in line with the new recommendations.

    Some people think that the old RDA was a suggested minimum and that more protein is always better. But that’s a misconception, Gardner said. In the 1980s, scientists calculated adults’ protein needs through controlled diet studies in which they measured everything that went in and everything that came out.

    The outcome of those studies is known as the estimated average requirement for protein, and it’s only 0.66 grams per kilogram. To make sure they were meeting the needs of the entire U.S. population, they set the RDA 20% higher. That 0.8 grams per kilogram was designed to meet the needs of 98% of American adults, Gardner said, so it shouldn’t be viewed as a minimum to “beat.”

    4. With all the protein talk, we might be neglecting fiber.

    While overconsuming protein likely isn’t harmful on its own, it’s important to look at where that extra protein is coming from, Gardner said. If it’s from red meat, as the new dietary guidelines emphasize, folks might be consuming unhealthy levels of saturated fat.

    And if we fill up on steaks and protein shakes, we’re not eating enough fiber and other nutrients found primarily in plant-based foods. National surveys show that, unlike for protein, only 5% of Americans are meeting the RDA for fiber, which is critical for gut health and reducing the risk of cardiovascular and other chronic diseases.

    “There are all kinds of antioxidants that can lower inflammation and prevent cancer, and those don’t come in meat and cheese and protein bars,” Gardner said.

    Foods like beans, legumes, and whole grains provide both protein and fiber, yet they are often overlooked when people try to increase protein intake.

    “Americans hardly eat any legumes,” he said. The average American eats less than 10 grams of legumes per day. “There’s plenty of room to increase that and get your fiber, your antioxidants and your plant protein, and have enough.”

    5. There’s no such thing as incomplete protein.

    If there’s one protein myth that Gardner wishes would die already, it’s the fable of the incomplete protein. For years, common nutrition advice has posited that plants contain so-called incomplete proteins, while animal proteins are complete. If you’re getting most of your protein from beans and legumes, the advice goes, you need to pair them with certain grains at the same meal to make up the difference.

    That’s bupkis, Gardner says. Plant proteins are not missing any of the 20 amino acids, although legumes have slightly less of one of those 20 than do animal proteins. If a person was eating only legumes and no excess protein, that lower amount of the single amino acid might be a problem. But that’s not the reality of the American diet.

    “If you need 50 grams of protein a day and you got only 50, then you’d have to be careful that it’s the right kind. But most Americans eat 80, 90, 100 grams of protein a day,” Gardner said. “At that point the distribution doesn’t have to be perfect, because you have so much extra.”

    Gardner and his colleagues published a paper in 2019 debunking the incomplete protein myth: They compared amino acid distributions in several different animal and plant foods and found that they’re nearly identical. A recent study even found that a vegan diet works just as well for muscle building as does an omnivore diet.

    Oppezzo notes a few other protein myths, namely that you can’t absorb more than a certain amount of protein at once, so it needs to be evenly distributed throughout your daily meals. While you might find it easier to eat 25 grams of protein in three meals than 75 grams all at once, studies have shown that there’s no real difference in how your body metabolizes protein by doing so. For older adults, however, splitting the protein among multiple meals can help ensure they get enough protein because, as we get older, we may need more protein within a given meal to trigger muscle protein synthesis.

    It is also not necessary to consume protein immediately after a workout. While there is an “anabolic window” when muscles repair and use nutrients more efficiently, it lasts about 24 hours. Eating regular meals throughout the day is sufficient.

    And finally, eating more than the RDA can have its drawbacks — even if it’s not coming from protein-packed potato chips or pastries.

    “I don’t think a high-protein diet is necessarily bad, but what are you not eating?” Oppezzo said. “Are you missing out on the fiber, vitamins, phytochemicals and antioxidants that vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and nuts provide?”

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Diet Fiber Nutrition Protein Stanford University
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Stanford Study Reveals That a Vegan Diet Can Improve Heart Health in Just 8 Weeks

    Scientists Discover Even More Reasons To Eat Fiber

    Scientists Shed New Light on the Protein Diet Paradox

    Animal vs. Plant Protein: New Research Suggests That These Protein Sources Are Not Nutritionally Equivalent

    A New Way To Lose Weight Could Change Your Metabolism

    Scientists: Eat More of This Carb – Even Supplements Make a Big Difference

    Researchers Find That Eating Just a Little More Protein Can Enhance Your Health

    Humans Absorb Less Protein From Plant-Based Meat Than Normal Meat

    Higher Protein Intake Does Not Increase Lean Body Mass in Older Men

    4 Comments

    1. Dallas Latham on April 11, 2026 3:52 pm

      What most people don’t realise is that a great deal of protein is used in intracellular energy production, especially in electron transport system

      Reply
    2. Charles G. Shaver on April 12, 2026 8:48 am

      While as a now only relatively healthy 82 year old lay American male with family histories of very mild food allergies, dementia and premature disability and mortality I do not find fault with most of the food facts, however, I do find fault with the completeness of their investigations; missing three highly relevant factors. First, they failed to include my kind of mostly proteinaceous-food allergy reactions (Dr. Arthur F. Coca; “The Pulse Test,” 1956). Next, they failed to include to include officially (FDA in the US) approved food poisoning, as such (soy, TBHQ and added MSG, minimally). Lastly, they failed to include excessive related/resultant medical errors, including bad dietary advice from most healthcare providers. For me, that renders the gist of the article inaccurate, incomplete and moot.

      Reply
    3. Matthew Dougherty on April 12, 2026 10:21 am

      The hype regarding protein misses the mark on the real issue, amino acids, particularly the Non-Essential-Amino-Acids the human cells can produce. A major misconception is that NEAA production is constant, case closed, dating back to Rose (1948). We now know that as a person ages, the endogenous production of some AA declines. In the case of glycine, 90% by 90. Consider that glycine is the most used amino acid, perhaps the second most ubiquitous molecule behind water. Representing 19% of all proteinic amino acids, it is only 3% of meat; that is, it is used in a lot non-protein biochemistry. If you want to boost glycine intake, eat skin, tendons and collagen, not part of most diets. Similar anomalies occur with other amino acids such as aspartic acid and methionine, which at high doses reduce lifespan. Another misconception is all proteins are the dietarily the same; muscle AA profile varies compared to non-meat protein due to molecular function. Dietary science needs more research and funding into AA profiles, and related clinical testing to better adjust needed amino acids intake at different ages. One theory on some causes of osteoarthritis is that it caused by glycine deficiency. Thirty years of research indicate that glycine deficiency being a driving factor causing diabetes and hypercholesterolemia.

      Reply
    4. G on April 13, 2026 5:43 am

      It’s so weird seeing people lean on protein supplementation (powders, bars, etc). And processed junk (low fat cookies, cakes, etc)

      This article tries to make the claim that eating high-protein and/or low-fat diets are a problem. Yet the examples they cite are people of today eating Quest bars and protein chips, or in the 90s on low fat diets eating Snackwell’s products.

      You want sufficient protein, sufficient fiber, vitamins, minerals and no junk food?
      Eat plenty of lean meat, (or whitefish and shellfish, or fat-free plain Greek yogurt), veggies, berries and other low sugar fruits. Eat small amounts of sweeter fruits. Drink water. Enter your intake into Cronometer every day. You will almost always find protein and fiber, as well as every vitamin and mineral near, at or over the RDA

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    New “Nanozyme Hypothesis” Could Rewrite the Story of Life’s Origins

    Anatomy Isn’t Finished: The Human Body Still Holds Secrets

    “Pretty Close to Home”: The Hidden Earthquake Threat Beneath Seattle

    The Surprising Reason You Might Want To Sleep Without a Pillow

    Scientists Say This Natural Hormone Reverses Obesity by Targeting the Brain

    35-Million-Year-Old Mystery: Strange Arachnid Discovered Preserved in Amber

    Is AI Really Just a Tool? It Could Be Altering How You See Reality

    JWST Reveals a “Forbidden” Planet With a Baffling Composition

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • These New Molecules Could Change How We Treat Lupus and Arthritis
    • Saunas May Do More Than Raise Body Temperature – They Activate Your Immune System
    • Exercise in a Pill? Metformin Shows Surprising Effects in Cancer Patients
    • Saturn’s Magnetic Shield Isn’t What Scientists Expected
    • Hidden Oceans of Magma Could Be Protecting Alien Life
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.