Helping Avoid a “Tipping Point” – New Way To Measure Tropical Forest Vulnerability

This image shows the rainforest and Ndoki River near Mbeli and Mokeli. Researchers reporting in the journal One Earth on July 23 have developed a new method called the tropical forest vulnerability index (TFVI) to keep tabs on the vulnerability of these forests on a global scale using satellite data. Credit: Photo by Michael Nichols, National Geographic

Humid tropical forests, vital in global efforts to limit rising temperatures, are under threat as a result of changes in land use and climate. Now, researchers reporting in the journal One Earth on July 23, 2021, have developed a new way to keep tabs on the vulnerability of these forests on a global scale using satellite data. Called the tropical forest vulnerability index (TFVI), the hope is that this method will serve as an early warning for areas that are under the greatest threat to enable actions aimed at protecting these forests before it’s too late.

“Frequent droughts, higher temperature, and longer dry seasons, along with increasing pressures from deforestation and degradation in the last two decades, have pushed the tropical rainforests to the verge of a tipping point,” said Sassan Saatchi of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. “What we predicted using climate models a decade ago, we are observing on the ground. Now is the time to do something and not later. This work takes advantage of a suite of satellite observations made for the past few decades to show how and where the tipping points may be reached and to help policymakers plan for conservation and restoration of these forests.”

There have been other ways to measure the vulnerability of rainforests. However, most of them relied on local studies and couldn’t easily be extended to larger regions or the globe. This lack of consistency and ability to make comparisons from one region to another has led to confusion and inaction. To get around these stumbling blocks, Saatchi and colleagues set out to develop a unique tropical rainforest vulnerability index that could work across all rainforests based on observations of climate and vegetation from satellites.

The new index combines numerous measurements and indicators of forest ecological functions and services, including carbon and water fluxes and biodiversity. It also provides spatial information with monthly updates and allows researchers to identify and monitor areas with increasing vulnerability or potential threats before it’s too late.

Their studies have shown that different regions of the tropics are responding differently to climate threats, with some regions showing more apparent resilience than others. For instance, forests in the Americas appear to be more vulnerable to stresses than those in Africa, where they are showing relative resilience to changing climate. In Asia, tropical forests appear more vulnerable to land use and fragmentation.

Individual rain forests also show important differences in their response to climate and land use pressures. For instance, the Amazon Basin shows large-scale vulnerability to drying condition in the atmosphere, with frequent droughts and large-scale land use changes. The Congo Basin, on the other hand, appears more resilient because of the historical impacts of droughts, the overall dryer condition, and smaller-scale land use change and fragmentation.

The researchers also uncovered strong interactions between climate, land use, and biodiversity that define the vulnerability and resilience of forests. The new index allowed them to identify the nature of these interactions over all global rainforests.

“The findings show that the vulnerability of rainforests is much larger than predicted in the past, and areas that are disturbed or fragmented have almost no resilience to climate warming and droughts,” Saatchi said. “In addition, the results of our study suggest that rainforests are losing their capacity to cycle carbon and water as before. This is occurring gradually at the continental scale and more rapidly at the regional scale, with significant implications for the global carbon sink and climate.”

The TFVI was developed by many scientists and conservationists assembled by the National Geographic Society and Rolex and therefore represents a consensus approach from the broader community, Saatchi notes. The hope is that the larger global community of scientists and policymakers, particularly in tropical countries, will now make use of the index to systematically assess the vulnerability of rainforest resources and to develop nature-based solutions to meet their commitments to the Paris Agreement. To keep tabs on future changes and threats to the world’s tropical forests, the researchers say that the new index will continue to be renewed automatically as time goes on.

Reference: “Detecting vulnerability of humid tropical forests to multiple stressors” by Sassan Saatchi, Marcos Longo, Liang Xu, Yan Yang, Hitofumi Abe, Michel André, Juliann E. Aukema, Nuno Carvalhais, Hinsby Cadillo-Quiroz, Gillian Ann Cerbu, Janet M. Chernela, Kristofer Covey, Lina María Sánchez-Clavijo, Isai V. Cubillos, Stuart J. Davies, Veronique De Sy, Francois De Vleeschouwer, Alvaro Duque, Alice Marie Sybille Durieux, Kátia De Avila Fernandes, Luis E. Fernandez, Victoria Gammino, Dennis P. Garrity, David A. Gibbs, Lucy Gibbon, Gae Yansom Gowae, Matthew Hansen, Nancy Lee Harris, Sean P. Healey, Robert G. Hilton, Christine May Johnson, Richard Sufo Kankeu, Nadine Therese Laporte-Goetz, Hyongki Lee, Thomas Lovejoy, Margaret Lowman, Raymond Lumbuenamo, Yadvinder Malhi, Jean-Michel M. Albert Martinez, Carlos Nobre, Adam Pellegrini, Jeremy Radachowsky, Francisco Román, Diane Russell, Douglas Sheil, Thomas B. Smith, Robert G.M. Spencer, Fred Stolle, Hesti Lestari Tata, Dennis del Castillo Torres, Raphael Muamba Tshimanga, Rodrigo Vargas, Michelle Venter, Joshua West, Atiek Widayati, Sylvia N. Wilson, Steven Brumby and Aurora C. Elmore, 23 July 2021, One Earth.
DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.002

This work was supported by the National Geographic Society and Rolex’s Perpetual Planet Initiative and by NASA’s Postdoctoral, Terrestrial Ecology and Carbon Cycle, and Interdisciplinary Science programs.

Cell PressClimate ChangeEcologyForests
Comments ( 2 )
Add Comment
  • The 10th Man

    All I see is a lot of eco-scientist trying to get their piece of the grant pie. No Politician is going to follow anyone’s advise on this, because it makes them money too. Humans are gonna ruin this place for themselves and everything else. Nothing you say matters. Get a job building homes for the poor and stop wasting your lives.

    • Neil B

      My experience is that people that spout doom are standing at the ready with bats ready to kneecap anyone who makes a hopeful attempt, and need to get out of the way and keep their mouths shut.